Topic: Who has really been scammed by SC (->MC)? A self-report would be helpful... - page 2. (Read 3500 times)
May 22, 2012, 09:41:55 PM
Except they won't even make it to the crosswalk... they will die standing on the sidewalk screaming that they inventing the automobile, and have copyrighted the transmission concept, with everyone in a car laughing at them.
May 22, 2012, 09:01:24 PM
I don't have my panties in a twist. I couldn't care less about solidcoin. But you guys are giving a shit ton of free advertising for it. The webpage for Solidcoin was incredibly deceptive and lacking information on all kinds of important subjects. Since none of you want to provide any evidence, people will type in "www.microcash.org" and see that everything looks legit there--there might even be some favorable propaganda to let them know that the BTCTalk members are just full of shit and afraid. "They're scared of our new and improved awesome protocol blah blah blah" sound familiar?
As if warning people about Nigerian scams or 976 charge back phone numbers is some how helping the scammers. Those who hear the warning and proceed anyway are beyond help. SoiledCoin is welcome to all those who are too dumb to live. When they are killed crossing the street, Bitcoin cannot be associated with it.
May 22, 2012, 07:22:35 PM
I don't have my panties in a twist. I couldn't care less about solidcoin. But you guys are giving a shit ton of free advertising for it. The webpage for Solidcoin was incredibly deceptive and lacking information on all kinds of important subjects. Since none of you want to provide any evidence, people will type in "www.microcash.org" and see that everything looks legit there--there might even be some favorable propaganda to let them know that the BTCTalk members are just full of shit and afraid. "They're scared of our new and improved awesome protocol blah blah blah" sound familiar?
So are you...so now who is the hypocrit?
May 22, 2012, 07:18:27 PM
I don't have my panties in a twist. I couldn't care less about solidcoin. But you guys are giving a shit ton of free advertising for it. The webpage for Solidcoin was incredibly deceptive and lacking information on all kinds of important subjects. Since none of you want to provide any evidence, people will type in "www.microcash.org" and see that everything looks legit there--there might even be some favorable propaganda to let them know that the BTCTalk members are just full of shit and afraid. "They're scared of our new and improved awesome protocol blah blah blah" sound familiar?
May 22, 2012, 07:06:59 PM
You have to understand that people like you pop up about once a week. You haven't been following the conversation since the beginning of Solidcoin and for some reason can't click on a persons post history (Coinhunters) and read what has already been said on the subject.
I've read most of the solidcoin threads. The whole purpose of "people who pop up once a week", which I have not, is to give them an easy way to learn this information without the poo-covered cherry on top. If you don't provide any evidence, all you do is give credit to any SC supporter who says "they're just afraid it will take down bitcoin."
Quote
You then claim that the information you have seen so far is incomplete, and you cannot draw any conclusions from it. That statement is true, and you should not draw any conclusions from the small bit of the play you have seen. Unfortunately, some of the best actors deleted their own performances when their true identities were discovered (Viper and Psi).
So? You have evidence available, for now, here: http://forums.microcash.org/index.php/topic/600-as-we-migrate/ that is probably going to be deleted soon, so get some screen shots and archive them somewhere.
You have evidence available in the block chain which may disappear as soon as microcash starts with what I assume will be with something new and just carrying over old accounts. That history of award changes will be gone forever if someone does not actively get it and archive it somewhere.
The onus of proof is on the accuser. So how's about some of you grow the f* up and do something constructive for a change.
Someone's got their panties in a twist. lol
May 22, 2012, 06:57:04 PM
You have to understand that people like you pop up about once a week. You haven't been following the conversation since the beginning of Solidcoin and for some reason can't click on a persons post history (Coinhunters) and read what has already been said on the subject.
I've read most of the solidcoin threads. The whole purpose of "people who pop up once a week", which I have not, is to give them an easy way to learn this information without the poo-covered cherry on top. If you don't provide any evidence, all you do is give credit to any SC supporter who says "they're just afraid it will take down bitcoin."
Quote
You then claim that the information you have seen so far is incomplete, and you cannot draw any conclusions from it. That statement is true, and you should not draw any conclusions from the small bit of the play you have seen. Unfortunately, some of the best actors deleted their own performances when their true identities were discovered (Viper and Psi).
So? You have evidence available, for now, here: http://forums.microcash.org/index.php/topic/600-as-we-migrate/ that is probably going to be deleted soon, so get some screen shots and archive them somewhere.
You have evidence available in the block chain which may disappear as soon as microcash starts with what I assume will be with something new and just carrying over old accounts. That history of award changes will be gone forever if someone does not actively get it and archive it somewhere.
The onus of proof is on the accuser. So how's about some of you grow the f* up and do something constructive for a change.
May 22, 2012, 03:06:08 PM
That bonus applies to bitcoiners as well, there you are right.. but not the way it does/did for SC users. In bitcoin coin generazion drops from 50 to 25 - not from 32 to 0.X... and not all of a sudden but with a plan in mind..
To be fair, at least the system is inflationary and not restricted so there is no insane amount of control that the early adopters could have over the currency via the supply itself... BUT THEN the CPF exists and throws that out the window.
Quote
And WHY is there a fee? Does it have any legitimation? And reason to be there? Especially: Who is the benefitor? Maybe those chosen few who have 9/10 of all coins?
The legitimacy of the fee is in serious doubt by anyone who isn't eating from the hand of RS. Even by some of those that do.
Quote
No.. i meant its predecessor. Solidcoin2 was meant to be a CPU only chain until all of a sudden a GPU miner was released with RealSolid being the first one to cheer about it..
Respond to my statements about this. From what it looks like to me is that something is being blown out of proportion here. I think you're looking for a conspiracy where there isn't one. But I can't say for sure because your facts are seemingly hearsay.
"if you look at the early blockchain you will notice the dickminer and if you look up for when there was a major drop in hashing speed of the big BTCPools you will notice the dickminer disappeared. Not exactly evidence, but a damn good correlation."
provide links and explain this correlation for someone who was not here when this happened. None of this groks for someone not knowing the whole story.
I really suggest a sticky thread or something that unbiasedly puts this information together. I'd do it but I wasn't here so I am not intimately familiar with what happened and I won't go off hearsay.
You have to understand that people like you pop up about once a week. You haven't been following the conversation since the beginning of Solidcoin and for some reason can't click on a persons post history (Coinhunters) and read what has already been said on the subject.
You then claim that the information you have seen so far is incomplete, and you cannot draw any conclusions from it. That statement is true, and you should not draw any conclusions from the small bit of the play you have seen. Unfortunately, some of the best actors deleted their own performances when their true identities were discovered (Viper and Psi).
Well said.
May 22, 2012, 01:31:07 PM
That bonus applies to bitcoiners as well, there you are right.. but not the way it does/did for SC users. In bitcoin coin generazion drops from 50 to 25 - not from 32 to 0.X... and not all of a sudden but with a plan in mind..
To be fair, at least the system is inflationary and not restricted so there is no insane amount of control that the early adopters could have over the currency via the supply itself... BUT THEN the CPF exists and throws that out the window.
Quote
And WHY is there a fee? Does it have any legitimation? And reason to be there? Especially: Who is the benefitor? Maybe those chosen few who have 9/10 of all coins?
The legitimacy of the fee is in serious doubt by anyone who isn't eating from the hand of RS. Even by some of those that do.
Quote
No.. i meant its predecessor. Solidcoin2 was meant to be a CPU only chain until all of a sudden a GPU miner was released with RealSolid being the first one to cheer about it..
Respond to my statements about this. From what it looks like to me is that something is being blown out of proportion here. I think you're looking for a conspiracy where there isn't one. But I can't say for sure because your facts are seemingly hearsay.
"if you look at the early blockchain you will notice the dickminer and if you look up for when there was a major drop in hashing speed of the big BTCPools you will notice the dickminer disappeared. Not exactly evidence, but a damn good correlation."
provide links and explain this correlation for someone who was not here when this happened. None of this groks for someone not knowing the whole story.
I really suggest a sticky thread or something that unbiasedly puts this information together. I'd do it but I wasn't here so I am not intimately familiar with what happened and I won't go off hearsay.
You have to understand that people like you pop up about once a week. You haven't been following the conversation since the beginning of Solidcoin and for some reason can't click on a persons post history (Coinhunters) and read what has already been said on the subject.
You then claim that the information you have seen so far is incomplete, and you cannot draw any conclusions from it. That statement is true, and you should not draw any conclusions from the small bit of the play you have seen. Unfortunately, some of the best actors deleted their own performances when their true identities were discovered (Viper and Psi).
+1
May 22, 2012, 11:40:59 AM
That bonus applies to bitcoiners as well, there you are right.. but not the way it does/did for SC users. In bitcoin coin generazion drops from 50 to 25 - not from 32 to 0.X... and not all of a sudden but with a plan in mind..
To be fair, at least the system is inflationary and not restricted so there is no insane amount of control that the early adopters could have over the currency via the supply itself... BUT THEN the CPF exists and throws that out the window.
Quote
And WHY is there a fee? Does it have any legitimation? And reason to be there? Especially: Who is the benefitor? Maybe those chosen few who have 9/10 of all coins?
The legitimacy of the fee is in serious doubt by anyone who isn't eating from the hand of RS. Even by some of those that do.
Quote
No.. i meant its predecessor. Solidcoin2 was meant to be a CPU only chain until all of a sudden a GPU miner was released with RealSolid being the first one to cheer about it..
Respond to my statements about this. From what it looks like to me is that something is being blown out of proportion here. I think you're looking for a conspiracy where there isn't one. But I can't say for sure because your facts are seemingly hearsay.
"if you look at the early blockchain you will notice the dickminer and if you look up for when there was a major drop in hashing speed of the big BTCPools you will notice the dickminer disappeared. Not exactly evidence, but a damn good correlation."
provide links and explain this correlation for someone who was not here when this happened. None of this groks for someone not knowing the whole story.
I really suggest a sticky thread or something that unbiasedly puts this information together. I'd do it but I wasn't here so I am not intimately familiar with what happened and I won't go off hearsay.
You have to understand that people like you pop up about once a week. You haven't been following the conversation since the beginning of Solidcoin and for some reason can't click on a persons post history (Coinhunters) and read what has already been said on the subject.
You then claim that the information you have seen so far is incomplete, and you cannot draw any conclusions from it. That statement is true, and you should not draw any conclusions from the small bit of the play you have seen. Unfortunately, some of the best actors deleted their own performances when their true identities were discovered (Viper and Psi).
May 22, 2012, 07:25:22 AM
Why bother to actually put some thought and evidence into a thread to dissuade newbies rather than them wading through the myriad of unsubstantiated FUD that all of you who love to rage against solidcoin do?
Nah let's just continue the 10-year-old style back and forth between two sets of mouth foamers.
Nah let's just continue the 10-year-old style back and forth between two sets of mouth foamers.
May 22, 2012, 07:06:10 AM
Why bother? If somebody needs information about ShortBusCoin, or any of the derivatives there is a whole forum devoted to just that subject. While the inspiration, code, and concept were taken from here, this is not that forum, and it has no need of providing stickied resources for the two or three potential users who would need any information about these shallow, worthless copycat coins.
May 22, 2012, 04:06:17 AM
That bonus applies to bitcoiners as well, there you are right.. but not the way it does/did for SC users. In bitcoin coin generazion drops from 50 to 25 - not from 32 to 0.X... and not all of a sudden but with a plan in mind..
To be fair, at least the system is inflationary and not restricted so there is no insane amount of control that the early adopters could have over the currency via the supply itself... BUT THEN the CPF exists and throws that out the window.
Quote
And WHY is there a fee? Does it have any legitimation? And reason to be there? Especially: Who is the benefitor? Maybe those chosen few who have 9/10 of all coins?
The legitimacy of the fee is in serious doubt by anyone who isn't eating from the hand of RS. Even by some of those that do.
Quote
No.. i meant its predecessor. Solidcoin2 was meant to be a CPU only chain until all of a sudden a GPU miner was released with RealSolid being the first one to cheer about it..
Respond to my statements about this. From what it looks like to me is that something is being blown out of proportion here. I think you're looking for a conspiracy where there isn't one. But I can't say for sure because your facts are seemingly hearsay.
"if you look at the early blockchain you will notice the dickminer and if you look up for when there was a major drop in hashing speed of the big BTCPools you will notice the dickminer disappeared. Not exactly evidence, but a damn good correlation."
provide links and explain this correlation for someone who was not here when this happened. None of this groks for someone not knowing the whole story.
I really suggest a sticky thread or something that unbiasedly puts this information together. I'd do it but I wasn't here so I am not intimately familiar with what happened and I won't go off hearsay.
May 22, 2012, 04:00:40 AM
again: i haven't read anything about YOU concerning this theme
LTC too has come out as a CPU-only-chain
i did a personal statement of being scammed by this currency, like - i think - several others...
... but i haven't been scammed by SC
c) the reaperV13 made obvious to everyone, that LTC is nicely minable by GPUs...
No.. i meant its predecessor. Solidcoin2 was meant to be a CPU only chain until all of a sudden a GPU miner was released with RealSolid being the first one to cheer about it.. LTC too has come out as a CPU-only-chain
i did a personal statement of being scammed by this currency, like - i think - several others...
... but i haven't been scammed by SC
May 22, 2012, 03:03:20 AM
1) Early adopter bonus
this bonus is for everyone: the early bird catches the worm...
even you could have done it...
ask some early (happy) bitcoiner
That bonus applies to bitcoiners as well, there you are right.. but not the way it does/did for SC users. In bitcoin coin generazion drops from 50 to 25 - not from 32 to 0.X... and not all of a sudden but with a plan in mind.. this bonus is for everyone: the early bird catches the worm...
even you could have done it...
ask some early (happy) bitcoiner
2) MC Fee structure
we will see when it's released...
but the plan of a small fee of ~ 2 MC$ a year to hold the account seems to me not oversized
And WHY is there a fee? Does it have any legitimation? And reason to be there? Especially: Who is the benefitor? Maybe those chosen few who have 9/10 of all coins? we will see when it's released...
but the plan of a small fee of ~ 2 MC$ a year to hold the account seems to me not oversized
3) Altering key parameters
so far as i know: the one-man-show has come to an end, now there is a developer-team...
so with SC, it worked, but i don't think with MC...
We have heard the fairytale of the industries best crypto specialists also in SC2. As it turned out SC2 was only a result of plagiatism hence theft of intellectual property maintained by a one.man show. so far as i know: the one-man-show has come to an end, now there is a developer-team...
so with SC, it worked, but i don't think with MC...
4) Realsolid is a known thief
this denunciation is not a fact or have you seen his Character Certificate?
i leave this uncommented
See my answer to 3. this denunciation is not a fact or have you seen his Character Certificate?
i leave this uncommented
a) + b) botnets and DDOS - no comments
Comment as much as you like, but if you look at the early blockchain you will notice the dickminer and if you look up for when there was a major drop in hashing speed of the big BTCPools you will notice the dickminer disappeared. Not exactly evidence, but a damn good correlation.c) the reaperV13 made obvious to everyone, that LTC is nicely minable by GPUs...
No.. i meant its predecessor. Solidcoin2 was meant to be a CPU only chain until all of a sudden a GPU miner was released with RealSolid being the first one to cheer about it.. May 22, 2012, 01:39:09 AM
Several people on here have had their wallets invalidated by the network, which is possible since solidcoin is not decentralized as advertised.
please give us facts about these invalidated wallets, not only empty suggestions...
May 21, 2012, 10:12:30 PM
Short answer- anyone who bought into the fraud that is ShortBusCoin or StolenIntellectualPropertyCash. The entire premise of both is based on stolen code, stolen intellectual property and stolen branding. They are equally worthless except to a very small circle of insiders who artificially prop up the values, often by grotesque actions attacking the entire bitcoin community.
If you want to carry water for that group, go for it, but perhaps you could take your glowing fanboy adoration over to their forum, it really has no value whatsoever here. Here it just makes you look like another patsy.
If you want to carry water for that group, go for it, but perhaps you could take your glowing fanboy adoration over to their forum, it really has no value whatsoever here. Here it just makes you look like another patsy.
May 21, 2012, 09:18:35 PM
I played around with SC 1 and early SC 2. Actually guys, there was a time when RS wasn't a douche! That was very early on though. Back then, I actually preferred SC to BTC, as this was back when you had to wait 20 minutes before BTC would even show up in your wallet as unconfirmed, causing a lot of anxious minutes, trying to figure out if I had been scammed or not. I never got burned using SC, but after RS started acting like an asshat I sold off my SC and bought LTC, because at the time, they were fast, and backed by BTC. Then BTC began having faster transaction times, and I went back to BTC.
Long story short, I didn't stay invested in SC long enough to get screwed.
Long story short, I didn't stay invested in SC long enough to get screwed.
Yes at first RS wasnt a dick but that was for like 10 minutes. Once the initial rally in SC occurred he was like "i'm god and you shall bow to me lowly peasant"
LOL....the rest is history.....
May 21, 2012, 08:58:46 PM
I played around with SC 1 and early SC 2. Actually guys, there was a time when RS wasn't a douche! That was very early on though. Back then, I actually preferred SC to BTC, as this was back when you had to wait 20 minutes before BTC would even show up in your wallet as unconfirmed, causing a lot of anxious minutes, trying to figure out if I had been scammed or not. I never got burned using SC, but after RS started acting like an asshat I sold off my SC and bought LTC, because at the time, they were fast, and backed by BTC. Then BTC began having faster transaction times, and I went back to BTC.
Long story short, I didn't stay invested in SC long enough to get screwed.
Long story short, I didn't stay invested in SC long enough to get screwed.
May 21, 2012, 07:21:40 PM
You should consider yourself lucky that you've stayed under the radar. Unlike Bitcoin, your solidcoins can be taken any time by the owner. Several people on here have had their wallets invalidated by the network, which is possible since solidcoin is not decentralized as advertised.
interesting claim, tell us more about how your wallets were invalidated
May 21, 2012, 05:06:46 PM
Not me...
Of course not. You are CoinHunter, why would you scam yourself?
yeah, i have been caught by an extremely wise guy...
Edit: as thick as a brick
Jump to: