Topic: WHO IS HARMING WHO? - page 2. (Read 282 times)
This tends to happens when the bounty hunters sell their rewards the moment they get it on hand. Since a huge number gets engaged in this act all at once, the price fluctuates. On way to eliminate is by not giving the rewards to all the bounty hunters, all at once.
If ICO has big bounty - it's not TOP ICO. Good projects don't need bounty campaigns but investors are struggling to invest or pass through the lottery like it was in several ICOs with big hype: Seele, QuarkChain, NEX etc.
If you have some ETHs previously earned in bounty campaigns now it's more profitable to invest that ETHs in TOP ICOs and do not waste time for bounties campaigns.
If you have some ETHs previously earned in bounty campaigns now it's more profitable to invest that ETHs in TOP ICOs and do not waste time for bounties campaigns.
I think such price dumps are only possible when ICOs calculate the proportion of bounty unwisely. For instance, some ICOs don't shrink pools if they don't hit the hardcap which results in too many tokens allocated to bounty hunters most of whom are eager to fix their profit.
They like to blame bounty hunters but it is worth remembering that those that bought at the pre-sale might be getting 50% discount, so when it hits the exchanges they can get a nice profit selling at 75% of the ICO price.
I've heard it many times that ICO investors are blaming when their coins are dropping because of the bounty hunters.
In the first place, why they invested on that ICO if they knew it from the start that there will be bounty hunters that will dump the coin easily. Don't you forget that there are also developers that can dump that token easily and have an exit.
In the first place, why they invested on that ICO if they knew it from the start that there will be bounty hunters that will dump the coin easily. Don't you forget that there are also developers that can dump that token easily and have an exit.
I guess that's not all true, the fact is, be it bounty hunter or investor, want more profits, investors and bounty participants, just as much as to succeed an ICO, investor helps funding and bounty hunter even more vital, that is marketing and promotion. So stop blaming, because the price also depends on the development of the project itself
Yeah, that's the point I'm making. Everyone is working. The investor is putting in funds and the hunter us using time and energy and at the end everyone needs the profit. But anyways, some hunters do dump price quick whereas in some situations they hold. And one aspect is that, currently most bounties pay the hunters late and so I think they wont be the cause of the dump. If the investors keep the price healthy, hunters will join them. 
I guess that's not all true, the fact is, be it bounty hunter or investor, want more profits, investors and bounty participants, just as much as to succeed an ICO, investor helps funding and bounty hunter even more vital, that is marketing and promotion. So stop blaming, because the price also depends on the development of the project itself
Many times we hear on various telegram group chats that investors are blaming bounty hunters for price dump. So are the hunters really the cause of this red moments or investors are also part? In fact I have been in bounties that before hunters were paid, prices had dumped real bad. Some also had good prices after bounties were paid. I'm sure if we should create a list for that, we'll see a lot of surprising list of projects that investors dumped their own coins. I think we should all stop that blame game and keep the market and business alive.
This time many ICOs have a policy which pays token for investors with fixed rate each month (for example 10 or 20%) after ICO ended. So i think if they have a bounty campaign, and bounty reward usually paid one-time, hunters can dump price significantly. It's true that when bounty hunters get their reward, the coin rate goes down, because they immediately sell their reward. Investors can also be a part of this movement of a coin down, when someone is an early investor and gets a bonus of 50 to 100 percent, then he also sells a coin as soon as it enters the stock exchange. I consider that it is necessary to give a reward to hunters after the heads in parts, so that they gradually sell coins and this was not mass.
You're somehow right. I side with you concerning the high bonus offered. That is in one way or the other as an airdrop but at a higher amount, and it's highly likely for an investor to dump that. 
It's true that when bounty hunters get their reward, the coin rate goes down, because they immediately sell their reward. Investors can also be a part of this movement of a coin down, when someone is an early investor and gets a bonus of 50 to 100 percent, then he also sells a coin as soon as it enters the stock exchange. I consider that it is necessary to give a reward to hunters after the heads in parts, so that they gradually sell coins and this was not mass.
Many times we hear on various telegram group chats that investors are blaming bounty hunters for price dump. So are the hunters really the cause of this red moments or investors are also part? In fact I have been in bounties that before hunters were paid, prices had dumped real bad. Some also had good prices after bounties were paid. I'm sure if we should create a list for that, we'll see a lot of surprising list of projects that investors dumped their own coins. I think we should all stop that blame game and keep the market and business alive.
Jump to: