This is correct.
The dude can barely speak. I'd certainly put him somewhere in the puppeteer chain, but neither at the top nor as a neighbor node (aka, a handler.) Not at the top because of his almost ridiculously public face is unlikely to be characteristic of someone at the top. My belief is that someone like Soros or Kissinger were chosen and groomed precisely because they showed extreme psycho-pathology (and thus promise) at an early age. To get an idea of who might be nearer the top, analyze who did this selection.
Soros is, I believe, acting as a honeypot to attract attention and thus detract from it being directed elsewhere. The dude being like 98 years old or whaterever also gives him a very valid excuse to exit stage-left whenever it is convenient. His creepy kid is likewise expendable. Basically a fall-guy in training.
---
Edit: As for the question, look for someone on the Trilateral Commission. Study Patrick Woods' work explorations involving 'Technocracy' to understand why I say this. In fact, do it anyway. Please!
And...if Trump (should he get in) pulls a Ronald Reagan and is an outsider who immediately stocks his cabinet (and the USTR slot) with a Trilateral, it will answer the burning question about whether he is 'for real' or not.
