Pages:
Author

Topic: Who is Satoshi? Hypothesis with proof, reasoning, and statistical analysis - page 2. (Read 369 times)

legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
A group of people or even the government could force him to re-edit codes and will take him 1M BTC or probably add more 21B BTC before killing him.
Okay, first of, no one has a clue of how many BTC they own and second, they aren't some kind of Gods who can change the total bitcoins that will ever be produced.

But I want to say that it’s only a hypothesis.
Then don't mess it up with "proof, reasoning and statistical analysis" as it's just a conspiracy. Maybe don't even bother to search of who they are for the reasons PrivacyG outlined.
jr. member
Activity: 68
Merit: 1
Quote
And he was able to stay silent for exactly 4 days. On December 17, 2010 a man named Peter Wuille created his bitcoin talk account. He is a member of the bitcoin development team and always has been. He arrived in the forum out of seemingly thin air and jumped right into the thick of things and has been there ever since.

That's not a very strong argument. 186 people joined Bitcointalk between December 10 and when Peter Wuille joined, and by your logic, any of those people could be satoshi. Furthermore, you are assuming that satoshi created an account after he said goodbye. If he was planning on switching to a new account, it would also make sense that he created the new account before his post, perhaps even months ahead of time.

You make some interesting points. However, if 186 people indeed joined during that time frame (where did you get that info?) I would argue that none have had the impact/influence on the project. None of them stepping into the forefront of development days after and still.

But I want to say that it’s only a hypothesis. I look at it as a mystery which is compelling, like a treasure hunt of sorts. Whoever is behind the username is a larger than life figure. I certainly didn’t mean any disrespect. I’m sorry if I offended anybody with my post. I can take it down if that’s so.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 3
Unfortunately, I believe that he has passed away much like Hal Finney.
Though they are not the same person.
He loved what he did BTC.
legendary
Activity: 4466
Merit: 3391
Quote
And he was able to stay silent for exactly 4 days. On December 17, 2010 a man named Peter Wuille created his bitcoin talk account. He is a member of the bitcoin development team and always has been. He arrived in the forum out of seemingly thin air and jumped right into the thick of things and has been there ever since.

That's not a very strong argument. 186 people joined Bitcointalk between December 10 and when Peter Wuille joined, and by your logic, any of those people could be satoshi. Furthermore, you are assuming that satoshi created an account after he said goodbye. If he was planning on switching to a new account, it would also make sense that he created the new account before his post, perhaps even months ahead of time.
hero member
Activity: 3038
Merit: 617
Just another meaningless attempt where we try to unmask Satoshi.
Which is so much dumber than it sounds.  The man, group or whatever Satoshi was who gave you financial freedom and decided to vanish from the scene is now attacked by the users of his own creation.  Instead of spending our time to unmask and possibly kill or incarcerate an entity who gave us freedom, we should maybe better take a step back and see how this time can be used to make Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain better.

If Satoshi is not a government or an institution, then he is hundred percent a government's target and by unmasking the identity behind his name, we are doing him the worst thing he could get.

-
Regards,
PrivacyG

People just don't understand how bad it could get if Satoshi were to actually be identified. People don't understand the media sh*t-storm that would ensue from such an event. Were this to happen, we would see an attack on bitcoin like nothing we have ever seen. And now.. they would have a face to attach to it.

Regardless of our internal curiosities, we have to understand this is not a can of worms we want to open. Let Satoshi remain a legend.

Not only that. A group of people or even the government could force him to re-edit codes and will take him 1M BTC or probably add more 21B BTC before killing him.

OP post should be considered spam for attempting to waste user's time to read that article.  Peter is just like the other people who claims to be Satoshi, given an attention, he will make his followers believe he is entitled to fork BTC.
sr. member
Activity: 287
Merit: 368
"Stop using proprietary software."
Just another meaningless attempt where we try to unmask Satoshi.
Which is so much dumber than it sounds.  The man, group or whatever Satoshi was who gave you financial freedom and decided to vanish from the scene is now attacked by the users of his own creation.  Instead of spending our time to unmask and possibly kill or incarcerate an entity who gave us freedom, we should maybe better take a step back and see how this time can be used to make Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain better.

If Satoshi is not a government or an institution, then he is hundred percent a government's target and by unmasking the identity behind his name, we are doing him the worst thing he could get.

-
Regards,
PrivacyG

People just don't understand how bad it could get if Satoshi were to actually be identified. People don't understand the media sh*t-storm that would ensue from such an event. Were this to happen, we would see an attack on bitcoin like nothing we have ever seen. And now.. they would have a face to attach to it.

Regardless of our internal curiosities, we have to understand this is not a can of worms we want to open. Let Satoshi remain a legend.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1873
Crypto Swap Exchange
Just another meaningless attempt where we try to unmask Satoshi.
Which is so much dumber than it sounds.  The man, group or whatever Satoshi was who gave you financial freedom and decided to vanish from the scene is now attacked by the users of his own creation.  Instead of spending our time to unmask and possibly kill or incarcerate an entity who gave us freedom, we should maybe better take a step back and see how this time can be used to make Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain better.

If Satoshi is not a government or an institution, then he is hundred percent a government's target and by unmasking the identity behind his name, we are doing him the worst thing he could get.

-
Regards,
PrivacyG
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
TLDR; clickbaity article says that Peter Wuille is Satoshi.

Behind this misleading "proof, reasoning and statistical analysis" there's a coincidence that Peter registered in bitcointalk few days after Satoshi's last active date. Just another meaningless attempt where we try to unmask Satoshi.
jr. member
Activity: 68
Merit: 1
Sorry I didn't edit this -- Id love to hear your feedback/arguments against this

https://dbooneproductions.home.blog/2022/03/24/who-is-satoshi-nakamoto/
Pages:
Jump to: