Topic: Who Is Satoshi Nakamoto? - page 9. (Read 10710 times)
Szabo, look at his yesterday tweets ("It doesn't work like that. Learn or GTFO"). Typical Satoshi.
It is not Hal Finney, because Hal actually protected Szabo in his letter to the community by being suspiciously specific about the "Japanese origins". It is just too obvious.
-Nick Szabo, 2003
empahsis added
It is not Hal Finney, because Hal actually protected Szabo in his letter to the community by being suspiciously specific about the "Japanese origins". It is just too obvious.
Quote
The theory of the Byzantine generals has a practical equivalent -- the problem of replicating a serivce -- or, equivalently, a distributed object -- in such as way as to provide distributed security, or fault tolerance against arbitrary behavior of up to T malicious and colluding servers.
These services or distributed objects are sometimes called "intrusion tolerant", because the replicated service can resist attack and corruption of up to T servers. However, in the real world more perpetrated by insiders rather than intruders. Byzantine-resilient replication of a service across administrative domains or jurisdictions solves both problems.
These services or distributed objects are sometimes called "intrusion tolerant", because the replicated service can resist attack and corruption of up to T servers. However, in the real world more perpetrated by insiders rather than intruders. Byzantine-resilient replication of a service across administrative domains or jurisdictions solves both problems.
-Nick Szabo, 2003
empahsis added
I know he posted in this forum... Did anyone ever look into the forums logs to maybe trace him by IP address?
He always used Tor Browser and VPN to hide his real IP address.
And this is true because which admin looked at such for no reason?
User: Admin, can you look to see where Satoshi logs in from?
Admin: Sure, no prob.
User: Thanks.
Admin: WOW! This dude is slick. He or she used Tor and an VPN to hide his real IP address.
User: Thanks anyway.
Question: Which admin looked and why, then how did this truism become mainstream if the request was via some official means, for even via any other means, I can't think of a situation where an admin would take it upon himself to see what they could dig up then report the none-findings to the community. Think about it! This doesn't make a lick of sense.
I know he posted in this forum... Did anyone ever look into the forums logs to maybe trace him by IP address?
He always used Tor Browser and VPN to hide his real IP address.
I know he posted in this forum... Did anyone ever look into the forums logs to maybe trace him by IP address?
Oh, look everyone, his boyfriend came to the rescue.....
Or is it your other account?
At least this one quoted me right.
So tell us "boyfriend" what does this mean?:
"I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire."
Let me save you the trouble of having to ask someone with a bit of brains....
It means that I don't really think so but I wouldn't say he is not for sure.
Now, thank you for taking the time to google Dorian and come here and post.
But your post was completely unnecessary.
And you shouldn't have used your other account to "back you up".
Or is it your other account?
At least this one quoted me right.
So tell us "boyfriend" what does this mean?:
"I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire."
Let me save you the trouble of having to ask someone with a bit of brains....
It means that I don't really think so but I wouldn't say he is not for sure.
Now, thank you for taking the time to google Dorian and come here and post.
But your post was completely unnecessary.
And you shouldn't have used your other account to "back you up".
You just posted something that is silly and stupid and I commented on it and I'm sure many others will agree. Are others not allowed to comment now? Using petty insults doesn't do you any favors either and just distracts from the topic at hand which you are clearly trying to do. 'Put my hand on fire' doesn't make any sense either. Regardless, Dorian isn't satoshi so you can continue with the childishness of saying things like 'boyfriend' which are completely irrelevant and unnecessary like your entire post was because it doesn't change anything your previously said.
If there is someone that posts silly things and that is completely off topic is you and your other account.
No, noone else commented because they got what I was saying.
Apparently, it was only you that didn't get it.
And it's not that hard, it's basically that I wouldn't say Yes or No for sure.
What is silly or stupid about that?
Let me guess: It's the fact that you didn't get it.
My entire post was not irrelevant.
On the contrary yours was, in fact, why did you post?
Why do you keep wasting bandwidth when you are wrong and keep calling me things because you cannot comprehend what I have said?
Now please, either add to the topic - which is who is Satoshi - or go wash the dishes.
Thank you
Have a nice day.
Oh, look everyone, his boyfriend came to the rescue.....
Or is it your other account?
At least this one quoted me right.
So tell us "boyfriend" what does this mean?:
"I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire."
Let me save you the trouble of having to ask someone with a bit of brains....
It means that I don't really think so but I wouldn't say he is not for sure.
Now, thank you for taking the time to google Dorian and come here and post.
But your post was completely unnecessary.
And you shouldn't have used your other account to "back you up".
Or is it your other account?
At least this one quoted me right.
So tell us "boyfriend" what does this mean?:
"I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire."
Let me save you the trouble of having to ask someone with a bit of brains....
It means that I don't really think so but I wouldn't say he is not for sure.
Now, thank you for taking the time to google Dorian and come here and post.
But your post was completely unnecessary.
And you shouldn't have used your other account to "back you up".
You just posted something that is silly and stupid and I commented on it and I'm sure many others will agree. Are others not allowed to comment now? Using petty insults doesn't do you any favors either and just distracts from the topic at hand which you are clearly trying to do. 'Put my hand on fire' doesn't make any sense either. Regardless, Dorian isn't satoshi so you can continue with the childishness of saying things like 'boyfriend' which are completely irrelevant and unnecessary like your entire post was because it doesn't change anything your previously said.
I voted for Dorian.
He is the only one in that list that likes privacy and "kept away" from anything called digital currency.
All the rest had something to do with some kind of digital currency and they weren't discreet about it.
So I have no reason to believe it was any of them.
He is the only one in that list that likes privacy and "kept away" from anything called digital currency.
All the rest had something to do with some kind of digital currency and they weren't discreet about it.
So I have no reason to believe it was any of them.
He likes privacy so much that he releases bitcoin under his own name? Makes perfect sense /sarcasm. If there's one person that the creator of bitcoin isn't it's Dorian.
Don't you just love it when some idiots just rush to make their bullshit comment about someone's post, yet only quote what they need to make their bullshit comment? /sarcasm
Apart from that, he changed his name to Dorian and that is what he has been using for more than 30 years.
What you have (intentionally) left out:
Quote
Now, do I think it's truly Dorian?
I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire.
I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire.
I think the only idiot here is the person who thinks Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto is the guy who created bitcoin. If you think he is Satoshi then you're as foolish as the idiot who wrote the entirely speculative original article on him based on nothing but assumptions and circumstance and is getting sued for it. What good would be changing your name when you don't actual change it from having Satoshi Nakamoto in it? If you wanted to remain anon or sever all ties to yourself you wouldn't use any names previously associated with yourself and the real Satoshi wouldn't be stupid enough to do that.
Oh, look everyone, his boyfriend came to the rescue.....
Or is it your other account?
At least this one quoted me right.
So tell us "boyfriend" what does this mean?:
"I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire."
Let me save you the trouble of having to ask someone with a bit of brains....
It means that I don't really think so but I wouldn't say he is not for sure.
Now, thank you for taking the time to google Dorian and come here and post.
But your post was completely unnecessary.
And you shouldn't have used your other account to "back you up".
I voted for Dorian.
He is the only one in that list that likes privacy and "kept away" from anything called digital currency.
All the rest had something to do with some kind of digital currency and they weren't discreet about it.
So I have no reason to believe it was any of them.
He is the only one in that list that likes privacy and "kept away" from anything called digital currency.
All the rest had something to do with some kind of digital currency and they weren't discreet about it.
So I have no reason to believe it was any of them.
He likes privacy so much that he releases bitcoin under his own name? Makes perfect sense /sarcasm. If there's one person that the creator of bitcoin isn't it's Dorian.
Don't you just love it when some idiots just rush to make their bullshit comment about someone's post, yet only quote what they need to make their bullshit comment? /sarcasm
Apart from that, he changed his name to Dorian and that is what he has been using for more than 30 years.
What you have (intentionally) left out:
Quote
Now, do I think it's truly Dorian?
I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire.
I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire.
I think the only idiot here is the person who thinks Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto is the guy who created bitcoin. If you think he is Satoshi then you're as foolish as the idiot who wrote the entirely speculative original article on him based on nothing but assumptions and circumstance and is getting sued for it. What good would be changing your name when you don't actual change it from having Satoshi Nakamoto in it? If you wanted to remain anon or sever all ties to yourself you wouldn't use any names previously associated with yourself and the real Satoshi wouldn't be stupid enough to do that.
The hacker who recently attacked bitcointalk got the IP address each user registered through, and each user's last used IP address. He probably got two IP addresses used by Satoshi. Could those addresses reveal who Satoshi is if neither of them was a tor IP, or a VPN IP?
I very much doubt satoshi was dumb enough to leave traces of his IP behind especially when he went to all this trouble to stay anon. Besides, I think I read somewhere that theymos locked the account and removed any traces of his activity to stop people trying to hack into it for that reason.
Yeap, apart from that nobody is allowed to register an account name with the name Satoshi in it.
Try it and you will see I am right.
(Yes I tried it too
)What does that have to do with anything I said? And two or three donators changed their name to satoshi the other day. Not sure how they did it, though.
Well, you did mention that Theymos went through several precautional steps to ensure that satoshis account and name doesn't get tampered with.
I just said that he also went through the trouble of not allowing anyone to register using the founders name - Satoshi.
Does that not sound like relevant to you?
Not really. You said 'apart from' which doesn't make sense unless you are disagreeing with something I said.
Seriously now?
You did not find it relevant because I said "apart from", as in apart from what he said.....
Seriously?
I voted for Dorian.
He is the only one in that list that likes privacy and "kept away" from anything called digital currency.
All the rest had something to do with some kind of digital currency and they weren't discreet about it.
So I have no reason to believe it was any of them.
He is the only one in that list that likes privacy and "kept away" from anything called digital currency.
All the rest had something to do with some kind of digital currency and they weren't discreet about it.
So I have no reason to believe it was any of them.
He likes privacy so much that he releases bitcoin under his own name? Makes perfect sense /sarcasm. If there's one person that the creator of bitcoin isn't it's Dorian.
Don't you just love it when some idiots just rush to make their bullshit comment about someone's post, yet only quote what they need to make their bullshit comment? /sarcasm
Apart from that, he changed his name to Dorian and that is what he has been using for more than 30 years.
What you have (intentionally) left out:
Quote
Now, do I think it's truly Dorian?
I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire.
I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire.
I voted for Dorian.
He is the only one in that list that likes privacy and "kept away" from anything called digital currency.
All the rest had something to do with some kind of digital currency and they weren't discreet about it.
So I have no reason to believe it was any of them.
He is the only one in that list that likes privacy and "kept away" from anything called digital currency.
All the rest had something to do with some kind of digital currency and they weren't discreet about it.
So I have no reason to believe it was any of them.
He likes privacy so much that he releases bitcoin under his own name? Makes perfect sense /sarcasm. If there's one person that the creator of bitcoin isn't it's Dorian.
The hacker who recently attacked bitcointalk got the IP address each user registered through, and each user's last used IP address. He probably got two IP addresses used by Satoshi. Could those addresses reveal who Satoshi is if neither of them was a tor IP, or a VPN IP?
I very much doubt satoshi was dumb enough to leave traces of his IP behind especially when he went to all this trouble to stay anon. Besides, I think I read somewhere that theymos locked the account and removed any traces of his activity to stop people trying to hack into it for that reason.
Yeap, apart from that nobody is allowed to register an account name with the name Satoshi in it.
Try it and you will see I am right.
(Yes I tried it too
)What does that have to do with anything I said? And two or three donators changed their name to satoshi the other day. Not sure how they did it, though.
Well, you did mention that Theymos went through several precautional steps to ensure that satoshis account and name doesn't get tampered with.
I just said that he also went through the trouble of not allowing anyone to register using the founders name - Satoshi.
Does that not sound like relevant to you?
Not really. You said 'apart from' which doesn't make sense unless you are disagreeing with something I said.
I voted for Dorian.
He is the only one in that list that likes privacy and "kept away" from anything called digital currency.
All the rest had something to do with some kind of digital currency and they weren't discreet about it.
So I have no reason to believe it was any of them.
Now, do I think it's truly Dorian?
I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire.
He is the only one in that list that likes privacy and "kept away" from anything called digital currency.
All the rest had something to do with some kind of digital currency and they weren't discreet about it.
So I have no reason to believe it was any of them.
Now, do I think it's truly Dorian?
I wouldn't rule that out, but I wouldn't put my hand on fire.
The hacker who recently attacked bitcointalk got the IP address each user registered through, and each user's last used IP address. He probably got two IP addresses used by Satoshi. Could those addresses reveal who Satoshi is if neither of them was a tor IP, or a VPN IP?
I very much doubt satoshi was dumb enough to leave traces of his IP behind especially when he went to all this trouble to stay anon. Besides, I think I read somewhere that theymos locked the account and removed any traces of his activity to stop people trying to hack into it for that reason.
Yeap, apart from that nobody is allowed to register an account name with the name Satoshi in it.
Try it and you will see I am right.
(Yes I tried it too
)What does that have to do with anything I said? And two or three donators changed their name to satoshi the other day. Not sure how they did it, though.
Well, you did mention that Theymos went through several precautional steps to ensure that satoshis account and name doesn't get tampered with.
I just said that he also went through the trouble of not allowing anyone to register using the founders name - Satoshi.
Does that not sound like relevant to you?
The hacker who recently attacked bitcointalk got the IP address each user registered through, and each user's last used IP address. He probably got two IP addresses used by Satoshi. Could those addresses reveal who Satoshi is if neither of them was a tor IP, or a VPN IP?
I very much doubt satoshi was dumb enough to leave traces of his IP behind especially when he went to all this trouble to stay anon. Besides, I think I read somewhere that theymos locked the account and removed any traces of his activity to stop people trying to hack into it for that reason.
Yeap, apart from that nobody is allowed to register an account name with the name Satoshi in it.
Try it and you will see I am right.
(Yes I tried it too
)What does that have to do with anything I said? And two or three donators changed their name to satoshi the other day. Not sure how they did it, though.
The hacker who recently attacked bitcointalk got the IP address each user registered through, and each user's last used IP address. He probably got two IP addresses used by Satoshi. Could those addresses reveal who Satoshi is if neither of them was a tor IP, or a VPN IP?
I very much doubt satoshi was dumb enough to leave traces of his IP behind especially when he went to all this trouble to stay anon. Besides, I think I read somewhere that theymos locked the account and removed any traces of his activity to stop people trying to hack into it for that reason.
Yeap, apart from that nobody is allowed to register an account name with the name Satoshi in it.
Try it and you will see I am right.
(Yes I tried it too
) Who do you think is the REAL Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of Bitcoin?
You are missing a name (the real name) in your list of names.
It has recently been discovered that Satoshi is Tupac Shakur......
True story!
Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/satoshi-is-tupac-shakur-1072123
The hacker who recently attacked bitcointalk got the IP address each user registered through, and each user's last used IP address. He probably got two IP addresses used by Satoshi. Could those addresses reveal who Satoshi is if neither of them was a tor IP, or a VPN IP?
I very much doubt satoshi was dumb enough to leave traces of his IP behind especially when he went to all this trouble to stay anon. Besides, I think I read somewhere that theymos locked the account and removed any traces of his activity to stop people trying to hack into it for that reason.
Hmm who is the real satoshi maybe its the whole development team and used it as a name to throw people off maybe that person is realy or maybe its just a cover up who knows. The only time this will ever happen is if the real satoshi stands up comes back and makes himself known to the bitcoin core team devs and becomes part of it again. Maybe he is doing other cryptos. One will never truly known until the real satoshi steps up.
Regarding the current evidence, it is impossible to know who is Satoshi. Thinking someone is does nothing. Please stop this shit
Jump to: