Who own bpip.org? - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

hacker1001101001

sr. member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 415

Quote from: Bpip.org on March 28, 2020, 03:45:15 AM

I am not the person you think, I am alone and do not intend to deceive anyone.
I came here to clarify this issue.
anyone, ask your serious questions.

txs: bpip.org

OgNasty already asked the most serious question here.

Quote from: OgNasty on March 28, 2020, 04:21:18 AM

Why did you choose that name?

I would suggest you dumping this account and going with some other more attractive username as there are many.

o_e_l_e_o

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 18748

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on March 28, 2020, 01:43:10 AM

By looking at his post history I don't think he attempted to scam anyone or defraud.

"bpip.org" is not a name someone has chosen at random. He is obviously well aware of what the site is and what it does, as well as its good reputation around the forum. What reason, then, would he have to impersonate it? He wants to leech off the good reputation that the site has built, or wants people to think he is somehow affiliated or linked with the site. Either way, it's untrustworthy, regardless of whether or not he has tried to leverage it yet.

There are plenty of accounts which have been preemptively left red tags by theymos or members of the moderator team for impersonating other members or sites. This is nothing new.

therymos
theyomos
theyamos
theymnos
theynnos
theylmos
thkeymos

Tomtatocage

.BITMAIN
`BITMAIN
BITMAIN -

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2970

Terminated.

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on March 28, 2020, 01:43:10 AM

Quote from: Lauda on March 28, 2020, 01:31:33 AM

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on March 27, 2020, 09:53:48 PM

A neutral tag indicating the account having no affiliation with the real bpip.org would be an wise idea. On other side it's noting of an high risk though.

Never in the history of this forum have impersonators received neutral ratings for trying to defraud somebody else.

By looking at his post history I don't think he attempted to scam anyone or defraud. But I could understand your negative viewing of every situation due to your inner negativity. Quite an characteristic of evil.

Right, if I create an account called Lauda2 we should leave me neutral until I actually scam somebody? Good policy. Very intelligent. Monkeys rule.

Quote from: OgNasty on March 28, 2020, 04:21:18 AM

Why did you choose that name? The only logical explanation I can think of is that you were name squatting and hoping to sell the account to operators of the website in the future. Seems like impersonation when you started posting from it though. That crosses the line in my opinion. You should have just sat on the name and waited to be contacted, which would’ve kept you at least in the realm of a grey area.

That is it. We should never allow anyone do to this, regardless of their "pure intentions" bullshit.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Bpip.org on March 28, 2020, 03:45:15 AM

I am not the person you think, I am alone and do not intend to deceive anyone.
I came here to clarify this issue.
anyone, ask your serious questions.

txs: bpip.org

Why did you choose that name? The only logical explanation I can think of is that you were name squatting and hoping to sell the account to operators of the website in the future. Seems like impersonation when you started posting from it though. That crosses the line in my opinion. You should have just sat on the name and waited to be contacted, which would’ve kept you at least in the realm of a grey area.

Bpip.org

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

I am not the person you think, I am alone and do not intend to deceive anyone.
I came here to clarify this issue.
anyone, ask your serious questions.

txs: bpip.org

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on March 28, 2020, 01:43:10 AM

By looking at his post history I don't think he attempted to scam anyone or defraud.

It's better to give him negative trust for impersonating someone now, than when he ranked up his account. User "bpip.org" has nothing to lose now and can just create another account if he wants to become a productive forum member.

ChuckBuck

hero member

Activity: 1372

Merit: 783

better everyday ♥

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on March 28, 2020, 01:43:10 AM

By looking at his post history I don't think he attempted to scam anyone or defraud. But I could understand your negative viewing of every situation due to your inner negativity. Quite an characteristic of evil.

Considering the angle of the scammers, he only has a few posts, it will be difficult for many people to trust him. By being more active, he will build his activity history, because no one wants to trust new accounts. It may be a workaround if using the name of BPIP, but I don't know what BPIP's name will do to cheat or scam Roll Eyes

Advertise on BPIP?

hacker1001101001

sr. member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 415

Quote from: Lauda on March 28, 2020, 01:31:33 AM

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on March 27, 2020, 09:53:48 PM

A neutral tag indicating the account having no affiliation with the real bpip.org would be an wise idea. On other side it's noting of an high risk though.

Never in the history of this forum have impersonators received neutral ratings for trying to defraud somebody else.

By looking at his post history I don't think he attempted to scam anyone or defraud. But I could understand your negative viewing of every situation due to your inner negativity. Quite an characteristic of evil.

The Cryptovator

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 2226

Signature space for rent

I think this account is an impersonator. Since vod already tag so I think its reasonable. Because may be some users would think that Bpip.org is official account of website and they might get scam since there is opportunity to advertise on the website and could ask for donations as well. I don't know what would be exact reason except abuse to use a username of a website which is most popular on the forum and that website owner is an established user.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2970

Terminated.

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on March 27, 2020, 09:53:48 PM

A neutral tag indicating the account having no affiliation with the real bpip.org would be an wise idea. On other side it's noting of an high risk though.

Never in the history of this forum have impersonators received neutral ratings for trying to defraud somebody else.

ChuckBuck

hero member

Activity: 1372

Merit: 783

better everyday ♥

I wonder what is the purpose of creating that account? Most people participating in altcoins are not interested in BPIP and the ratings are there. Altcoins are primarily for spammers and bounty hunters, of course they only care about bonuses, not relevant ranking information. I also don't see any benefits around that name, abuse, fraud, .. not possible Roll Eyes

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Little Mouse on March 27, 2020, 09:48:15 PM

I am not talking about the website Grin

I know Vod own this website for a long time now.

I built the website, but it's owned by the BPIP Team.

That account bpip.org is not affiliated with me, so I will tag it.

hacker1001101001

sr. member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 415

A neutral tag indicating the account having no affiliation with the real bpip.org would be an wise idea. On other side it's noting of an high risk though.

Little Mouse

legendary

Activity: 2254

Merit: 2305

Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse

I am not talking about the website Grin

I know Vod own this website for a long time now. But I just have seen an account bpip.org, who own the account. This account is active in altcoin section and that's what surprise me most.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bpiporg-2647943
I doubt Vod is the one. If not, will it be good idea to tag the account? Because people may not know and I may forget in future too.

Topic: Who own bpip.org? - page 2. (Read 770 times)