He is alive,
As replied
and doesn't care
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=913321.new#new
I even offered to send him a copy of my ID showing I'm canadian and my postal code.
A dipshit, is a dipshit, is a dipshit.
Still doesn't explain WHY suddenly he felt a need to leave feed back on a thread from MARCH?
Topic: Who put VOd on such a high horse? - page 4. (Read 3763 times)
Once Again
VOD the hero
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/please-could-someone-verify-my-application-913371
Someone please knock this guy off his Godly thrown.
Read over the guys posts please
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vod-30747
He act's like an admin. he runs the forum, his rule is law. etc.
Regardless if the people are scammers.
He speaks as if his is God, his word is the law. and "F*ck you, I am VOD!"
VOD the hero
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/please-could-someone-verify-my-application-913371
Someone please knock this guy off his Godly thrown.
Read over the guys posts please
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/vod-30747
He act's like an admin. he runs the forum, his rule is law. etc.
Quote
ecause you were tagged trying to be a "fucking" scammer on one of your first chance posts. You were given a second chance over a 30 day period and you failed that too.
Clearly you want to run things your own way. Good for you - just don't look to me for a third chance.
Clearly you want to run things your own way. Good for you - just don't look to me for a third chance.
Regardless if the people are scammers.
He speaks as if his is God, his word is the law. and "F*ck you, I am VOD!"
Quote
Tried, and failed.
No loan for you. In fact, if anyone was stupid enough to loan you given your trust, that person should probably get negative trust for being an idiot. Undecided
No loan for you. In fact, if anyone was stupid enough to loan you given your trust, that person should probably get negative trust for being an idiot. Undecided
Lol thanks but VOD didn't lose me a job..
I'm an owner of the atm already,
no that's not him.
If you read the thread, and my rating
he found a march posting of me wanting a USD credit card to get a hulu account with (or hulu account)
where I stated the fake Postal code trick did not work for me
Than stated I used a fake postal code (beware)
and left negative.
He had nothing to do with the $1500 deal (only hundred... not a job..)
it was something I discussed this afternoon and my current trader rating hurt me.
He lives in norther Alberta. I'm in Manitoba. Likely 1100 miles apart or so.
No I understand what he said on his trust rating, however the fact that he was asked about you could have been the reason why he looked into a thread that was so old. I'm an owner of the atm already,
no that's not him.
If you read the thread, and my rating
he found a march posting of me wanting a USD credit card to get a hulu account with (or hulu account)
where I stated the fake Postal code trick did not work for me
Than stated I used a fake postal code (beware)
and left negative.
He had nothing to do with the $1500 deal (only hundred... not a job..)
it was something I discussed this afternoon and my current trader rating hurt me.
He lives in norther Alberta. I'm in Manitoba. Likely 1100 miles apart or so.
Without knowing the details of the deal/job I really can't say what an appropriate solution would be for you. My first instinct would be to suggest some kind of on forum escrow service however this may or may not be applicable to your specific situation.
If you are 1,100 miles away from each other then I would somewhat doubt that your trader knows him personally, however we do live in a global economy so who knows.
My experience with Vod is that he is generally a reasonable person, so I would think he will eventually see this thread and either give some kind of more detailed explanation or remove the rating.
Sorry for confusion.
The lost deal was started and ended AFTER the feedback.
I had no pending job's, deals or requests that would have warranted anyone to contact Sir VOD for anything.
His negative feedback came completely out of nowhere. I can see zero reason someone would contact him.
It would seem he simply got to page 80 of the forum and hit on my thread, decided to slander me and moved on to page 81.
Lol thanks but VOD didn't lose me a job..
I'm an owner of the atm already,
no that's not him.
If you read the thread, and my rating
he found a march posting of me wanting a USD credit card to get a hulu account with (or hulu account)
where I stated the fake Postal code trick did not work for me
Than stated I used a fake postal code (beware)
and left negative.
He had nothing to do with the $1500 deal (only hundred... not a job..)
it was something I discussed this afternoon and my current trader rating hurt me.
He lives in norther Alberta. I'm in Manitoba. Likely 1100 miles apart or so.
No I understand what he said on his trust rating, however the fact that he was asked about you could have been the reason why he looked into a thread that was so old. I'm an owner of the atm already,
no that's not him.
If you read the thread, and my rating
he found a march posting of me wanting a USD credit card to get a hulu account with (or hulu account)
where I stated the fake Postal code trick did not work for me
Than stated I used a fake postal code (beware)
and left negative.
He had nothing to do with the $1500 deal (only hundred... not a job..)
it was something I discussed this afternoon and my current trader rating hurt me.
He lives in norther Alberta. I'm in Manitoba. Likely 1100 miles apart or so.
Without knowing the details of the deal/job I really can't say what an appropriate solution would be for you. My first instinct would be to suggest some kind of on forum escrow service however this may or may not be applicable to your specific situation.
If you are 1,100 miles away from each other then I would somewhat doubt that your trader knows him personally, however we do live in a global economy so who knows.
My experience with Vod is that he is generally a reasonable person, so I would think he will eventually see this thread and either give some kind of more detailed explanation or remove the rating.
Lol thanks but VOD didn't lose me a job..
I'm an owner of the atm already,
no that's not him.
If you read the thread, and my rating
he found a march posting of me wanting a USD credit card to get a hulu account with (or hulu account)
where I stated the fake Postal code trick did not work for me
Than stated I used a fake postal code (beware)
and left negative.
He had nothing to do with the $1500 deal (only hundred... not a job..)
it was something I discussed this afternoon and my current trader rating hurt me.
He lives in norther Alberta. I'm in Manitoba. Likely 1100 miles apart or so.
I'm an owner of the atm already,
no that's not him.
If you read the thread, and my rating
he found a march posting of me wanting a USD credit card to get a hulu account with (or hulu account)
where I stated the fake Postal code trick did not work for me
Than stated I used a fake postal code (beware)
and left negative.
He had nothing to do with the $1500 deal (only hundred... not a job..)
it was something I discussed this afternoon and my current trader rating hurt me.
He lives in norther Alberta. I'm in Manitoba. Likely 1100 miles apart or so.
Well,
I just lost out on a $1500 deal because of my rating. Shady yes, I tried to explain it away, but nope
I've done deals with people who havn't left feedback, as I've left more than I've gotten.
I'm not some random. I run an ATM in a major Canadian City.
Look here's me on the far right :O
Had VOD asked for an explanation. Details or even commented to question before slandering me without reason. It could of been an easy fix.
Is that Vod on the left? I just lost out on a $1500 deal because of my rating. Shady yes, I tried to explain it away, but nope
I've done deals with people who havn't left feedback, as I've left more than I've gotten.
I'm not some random. I run an ATM in a major Canadian City.
Look here's me on the far right :O
Had VOD asked for an explanation. Details or even commented to question before slandering me without reason. It could of been an easy fix.
I would personally find it somewhat disconcerting if/when a potential employer/contractor makes a hiring decision based on a rating on a forum. That is generally not something that I would think would be a valid reason to make a decision to or to not do business with someone at that large of a scale.
I know that Vod is based in Canada (I think somewhere in western Canada, but am not 100% on this) so he may have been asked about you and this could have explained the reason why he gave you a negative the same day they made a decision not to hire you/deal with you). If this was the case the fact that he gave a negative trust rating on here would probably not have affected your chances of getting that deal.
If that is not the case then I would find it very strange that Vod happened to give you a negative rating the exact day that you lost a deal........
I had a positive from a web designer, who after paying shut down his business, so today whilst I was digging, decided to rewrite my pos. I guess he retracted his.
Just show's what one person like VOD can do to a user's rating over nothing.
He also left this over 12 hours ago, and has been online since.
So I'm simply being ignored.
Just show's what one person like VOD can do to a user's rating over nothing.
He also left this over 12 hours ago, and has been online since.
So I'm simply being ignored.
As I said previously, careless and or stupid people will be parted from their money no matter how many warnings we give them or how many users try to play whack-a-mole. When this community began there was no one really around "scambusting" like they do today. People had individual transactions, and if they went bad they were then themselves free to make accusations and it was generally judged on its merits. Since the community is much larger now and more filled with less technically proficient people, and more scammers this kind of individual attention to cases is restricted. Yet in spite of this the level of penalty enforcement has not decreased along with the decreased standard of evidence against users.
This results in a very divisive and destructive type of infighting that is counterproductive in building trust networks and simply results in making them a tool of extortion and harassment because everyone is ready to engage in a witch hunt. How do you think the first of us around here had to learn these things? We did it BY BUILDING OUR OWN TRUST NETWORKS, and taking managed and informed risks, not relying on green and red numbers. In the end all the scammer has to do is make a new name. Does playing whack-a-mole endlessly on random usernames really stop them?
What is an acceptable level of innocent people caught up in this? How much is an acceptable amount of their money, time, and effort burnt because of a careless false accusation? Can the cryptocoin community really afford to be burning people who want to honestly contribute now days? We are doing more to burn the users who want to contribute here than we are to punish the scammers. This policy is doing far more damage to this community than scammers ever could. And for what? Just to make the scammer change his username and try again.
As I mentioned before it is always appropriate to ask the "tough" questions to someone trying to do business. If they are honest they should have no problem either answering such questions or being honest they either do not wish to answer or cannot answer such questions. If it is any of the later then they likely have something to hide and it is likely the fact that they are trying to in some way scam. Anyone operating legitimately has an incentive to answer the "tough" questions because doing so adds a layer of legitimacy to their business.
Playing wach-a-mole does stop the scammers because they either need to buy a new account (which takes money) or need to create a new account which comes with time intensive countermeasures against scamming and are largely ineffective for scamming. As I mentioned before decreasing the scam rate, even marginally will help the bitcoin economy and the chances of bitcoin's success.
As you become a more experienced trader you should rely less on the default trust network and rely on your own trust network. You should either update your trust list or remember in your head who is trustworthy and who is not. Once you are an experienced trader you should give out negative trust only when someone has either scammed or when they are attempting to scam, or appear to be likely to attempt to scam in the future. You should not give trust to anyone you have a personal disagreement with as anyone who trusts your opinion may not want to trade with such person in the future over something personal. I do use an alternate account to view someone's trust feedback from the point of view that someone sees it by "default" as well as looking at feedback from my own trust network. I will share my trust network, you (or anyone else) is free to create a similar trust network or to add myself to their trust list to stay up to date as to whose feedback I personally deem accurate
Code:
theymos
Gavin Andresen
gmaxwell
~TECSHARE
Vod
John (John K.)
Tomatocage
BadBear
Blazr
DannyHamilton
~jasonslow
escrow.ms
Stunna
DefaultTrust
hilariousandco
~redsn0w
OldScammerTag
Any potential false accusation can be openly discussed here for anyone to see (as well as in the sales thread if an accusation is made via a posting instead of via trust). Any party potentially considering to trade with such person can take such discussion into consideration. Just because someone screams "scam" does not mean that something or someone is a scam, trust me I know from personal experience (I have had plenty of people be upset with me for various reasons that do not have to do with my potential to scam and have made false accusations against me, it did not negatively affect my ability to trade and if anything it highlighted my previous success).
This is horse shit. I have very little in positive, so because of this dip shit
Trust: -2: -1 / +1(1)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
When using the above trust network I see you as:Trust: -2: -1 / +1(1)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
Code:
3: -1 / +3(3)
From the looks of it you do not trade very much so I would find it somewhat unlikely that you would be affected in ways other then ego (not that I am defending this apparent trust rating that is probably not warranted).
I think it would be very appropriate for Vod to chime in to give some kind of explanation regarding his trust report to the OP
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Looks like someone removed their positive (or got demoted?). You had two or three positives before, right? I'll PM vod later if he doesn't remove it before.
This is horse shit. I have very little in positive, so because of this dip shit
Trust: -2: -1 / +1(1)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
How in the hell does one moron with a God complex get me to a -2 with a CAUTION warning?
On top of that, what give's him the right. and the complex that he simply get's to ignore me?
Sorry do I need to give a 1 month "cooling off period"
Trust: -2: -1 / +1(1)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
How in the hell does one moron with a God complex get me to a -2 with a CAUTION warning?
On top of that, what give's him the right. and the complex that he simply get's to ignore me?
Sorry do I need to give a 1 month "cooling off period"
As I said previously, careless and or stupid people will be parted from their money no matter how many warnings we give them or how many users try to play whack-a-mole. When this community began there was no one really around "scambusting" like they do today. People had individual transactions, and if they went bad they were then themselves free to make accusations and it was generally judged on its merits. Since the community is much larger now and more filled with less technically proficient people, and more scammers this kind of individual attention to cases is restricted. Yet in spite of this the level of penalty enforcement has not decreased along with the decreased standard of evidence against users.
This results in a very divisive and destructive type of infighting that is counterproductive in building trust networks and simply results in making them a tool of extortion and harassment because everyone is ready to engage in a witch hunt. How do you think the first of us around here had to learn these things? We did it BY BUILDING OUR OWN TRUST NETWORKS, and taking managed and informed risks, not relying on green and red numbers. In the end all the scammer has to do is make a new name. Does playing whack-a-mole endlessly on random usernames really stop them?
What is an acceptable level of innocent people caught up in this? How much is an acceptable amount of their money, time, and effort burnt because of a careless false accusation? Can the cryptocoin community really afford to be burning people who want to honestly contribute now days? We are doing more to burn the users who want to contribute here than we are to punish the scammers. This policy is doing far more damage to this community than scammers ever could. And for what? Just to make the scammer change his username and try again.
Everyone is so paranoid here that any inconsistency is grounds for scam accusations in their minds. IMO these people perpetrating this "scambusting" type activity are simply doing it to stoke their egos, because in the end the only person that can stop you from getting scammed is you. They might prevent a handful of the really dumb scammers from scamming temporarily, but thats about it. Additionally training everyone to take everyone eles's opinion rather than using your own critical thought to judge if someone is a scammer is training people to only trust those in authority (default trust list) while they scream about trusting no one. As a result no one is ever actually trusted because escrow is always used, therefore real trust networks are not formed any more. Using escrow doesn't prove somone trust worthy. Someone having an opportunity to steal from you and CHOOSING NOT TO is actually how you build real trust. Combine this with time and escalated value of trades and you have a real trust network, not just meaningless green and red numbers.
This community has accepted the "trust sytem" over actual trust networks of individuals you have personally traded with. The key is KNOWING your trading partner, not being so paranoid you are fearful of everyone who says something a little off and accuse them of scamming. Frankly these "scambusters" are harming this community tremendously in order to protect careless and or stupid people who will get scammed anyway because they don't bother to research their trading partners. In effect this "Scambusting" type behavior is becoming a lot more destructive than the scams it supposedly protects us from. IMO this community has become so obsessed with punishing scammers that they are no longer interested in actual justice or due process any more, only vengeance. Burn them all and let God sort it out.
I would disagree. There is one lender in the lending section that has started to give very high risk loans, including to people with negative trust without collateral (or insufficient collateral). As a result there have been a significant increase in the number of obvious loan scammers in the lending subform recently. Some of the loans have been repaid, however I am going to say that they were done so in order to give confidence to the scammers and to increase the willingness to give loans to scammers. This community has accepted the "trust sytem" over actual trust networks of individuals you have personally traded with. The key is KNOWING your trading partner, not being so paranoid you are fearful of everyone who says something a little off and accuse them of scamming. Frankly these "scambusters" are harming this community tremendously in order to protect careless and or stupid people who will get scammed anyway because they don't bother to research their trading partners. In effect this "Scambusting" type behavior is becoming a lot more destructive than the scams it supposedly protects us from. IMO this community has become so obsessed with punishing scammers that they are no longer interested in actual justice or due process any more, only vengeance. Burn them all and let God sort it out.
Most newer, inexperienced users/traders are not going to know how to properly spot a scam nor do they know how to otherwise protect themselves. The default trust system, at lest somewhat helps newer users determine who should be trusted and who should not be. The concept of sending a payment that cannot be disputed/charged back is not something that many people truly understand, therefore many people who are new to bitcoin will likely trade under the presumption they will have the same scam protections that payment methods like credit cards offer (and that they will obviously not receive when dealing with bitcoin). You are in a unique situation that you do not need to "send first" when trading with others therefore you have a much greater insight as to if someone is trying to scam you or not. Most other people do not have this luxury.
There have been a huge number of scams that relate to bitcoin both on this forum and off forum. It is in everyone's interest that owns bitcoin to prevent bitcoin related scams from happening because a high number of bitcoin scams means less confidence in bitcoin overall and a lower bitcoin price. It may or may not be appropriate for people to call out "scam" on the drop of a hat, however it is very appropriate for people to ask tough questions when they see questionable activity and if appropriate answers are not given to defiantly call out "scam"
using a vpn is not dodgy
the method i used is detailed here
http://support.unblock-us.com/customer/portal/articles/291534-i-do-not-have-a-us-credit-card-how-do-i-sign-up-for-hulu-plus-?b_id=530
and my original thread here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wtb-prepaid-credit-card-for-hulu-services-490950
Is in fact actually asking
So. Again. What did I do that was dodgy? I was really just trying to get a re loadable USA credit card with a valid address for buying my own subscription.
Or if possible someone who sold account (I've seen it done before)
But again. I'd like to know how I'm sketchy for lieing about a postal code, that I never even mentioned.
Unless he thinks I tried saying my postal code is 000, in which case, he's an idiot. and anyone who believe my postal code was actually 000 is an even larger idiot.
The point is. This guy seems to be up on some high horse, strutting around leaving negative feedback. without even investigating.
Or clarifying. an on top of that for some reason decided to TODAY, post negative rep on me
For a thread which hasn't seen activity since March 9th 2014.
So I guess he's gotten bored with nailing the new guy's and is now digging up shit that was likely on page 50 of the forums.
Everyone is so paranoid here that any inconsistency is grounds for scam accusations in their minds. IMO these people perpetrating this "scambusting" type activity are simply doing it to stoke their egos, because in the end the only person that can stop you from getting scammed is you. They might prevent a handful of the really dumb scammers from scamming temporarily, but thats about it. Additionally training everyone to take everyone eles's opinion rather than using your own critical thought to judge if someone is a scammer is training people to only trust those in authority (default trust list) while they scream about trusting no one. As a result no one is ever actually trusted because escrow is always used, therefore real trust networks are not formed any more. Using escrow doesn't prove somone trust worthy. Someone having an opportunity to steal from you and CHOOSING NOT TO is actually how you build real trust. Combine this with time and escalated value of trades and you have a real trust network, not just meaningless green and red numbers.the method i used is detailed here
http://support.unblock-us.com/customer/portal/articles/291534-i-do-not-have-a-us-credit-card-how-do-i-sign-up-for-hulu-plus-?b_id=530
and my original thread here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wtb-prepaid-credit-card-for-hulu-services-490950
Is in fact actually asking
Quote
I'm Canadian looking to signup for Hulu,
The postal code trick doesn't work as my postal code has 000 in it Smiley
Anyone selling a card? maybe $100 with a valid USA Zip code?
OR anyone selling Hulu account.
Please PM me!!
The postal code trick doesn't work as my postal code has 000 in it Smiley
Anyone selling a card? maybe $100 with a valid USA Zip code?
OR anyone selling Hulu account.
Please PM me!!
So. Again. What did I do that was dodgy? I was really just trying to get a re loadable USA credit card with a valid address for buying my own subscription.
Or if possible someone who sold account (I've seen it done before)
But again. I'd like to know how I'm sketchy for lieing about a postal code, that I never even mentioned.
Unless he thinks I tried saying my postal code is 000, in which case, he's an idiot. and anyone who believe my postal code was actually 000 is an even larger idiot.
The point is. This guy seems to be up on some high horse, strutting around leaving negative feedback. without even investigating.
Or clarifying. an on top of that for some reason decided to TODAY, post negative rep on me
Quote
Lying about his postal code for some odd reason. Beware...
For a thread which hasn't seen activity since March 9th 2014.
So I guess he's gotten bored with nailing the new guy's and is now digging up shit that was likely on page 50 of the forums.
This community has accepted the "trust sytem" over actual trust networks of individuals you have personally traded with. The key is KNOWING your trading partner, not being so paranoid you are fearful of everyone who says something a little off and accuse them of scamming. Frankly these "scambusters" are harming this community tremendously in order to protect careless and or stupid people who will get scammed anyway because they don't bother to research their trading partners. In effect this "Scambusting" type behavior is becoming a lot more destructive than the scams it supposedly protects us from. IMO this community has become so obsessed with punisment that they are no longer interested in actual justice or due process any more, only vengeance. Burn them all and let God sort it out.
using a vpn is not dodgy
the method i used is detailed here
http://support.unblock-us.com/customer/portal/articles/291534-i-do-not-have-a-us-credit-card-how-do-i-sign-up-for-hulu-plus-?b_id=530
and my original thread here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wtb-prepaid-credit-card-for-hulu-services-490950
Is in fact actually asking
So. Again. What did I do that was dodgy? I was really just trying to get a re loadable USA credit card with a valid address for buying my own subscription.
Or if possible someone who sold account (I've seen it done before)
But again. I'd like to know how I'm sketchy for lieing about a postal code, that I never even mentioned.
Unless he thinks I tried saying my postal code is 000, in which case, he's an idiot. and anyone who believe my postal code was actually 000 is an even larger idiot.
The point is. This guy seems to be up on some high horse, strutting around leaving negative feedback. without even investigating.
Or clarifying. an on top of that for some reason decided to TODAY, post negative rep on me
For a thread which hasn't seen activity since March 9th 2014.
So I guess he's gotten bored with nailing the new guy's and is now digging up shit that was likely on page 50 of the forums.
the method i used is detailed here
http://support.unblock-us.com/customer/portal/articles/291534-i-do-not-have-a-us-credit-card-how-do-i-sign-up-for-hulu-plus-?b_id=530
and my original thread here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wtb-prepaid-credit-card-for-hulu-services-490950
Is in fact actually asking
Quote
I'm Canadian looking to signup for Hulu,
The postal code trick doesn't work as my postal code has 000 in it Smiley
Anyone selling a card? maybe $100 with a valid USA Zip code?
OR anyone selling Hulu account.
Please PM me!!
The postal code trick doesn't work as my postal code has 000 in it Smiley
Anyone selling a card? maybe $100 with a valid USA Zip code?
OR anyone selling Hulu account.
Please PM me!!
So. Again. What did I do that was dodgy? I was really just trying to get a re loadable USA credit card with a valid address for buying my own subscription.
Or if possible someone who sold account (I've seen it done before)
But again. I'd like to know how I'm sketchy for lieing about a postal code, that I never even mentioned.
Unless he thinks I tried saying my postal code is 000, in which case, he's an idiot. and anyone who believe my postal code was actually 000 is an even larger idiot.
The point is. This guy seems to be up on some high horse, strutting around leaving negative feedback. without even investigating.
Or clarifying. an on top of that for some reason decided to TODAY, post negative rep on me
Quote
Lying about his postal code for some odd reason. Beware...
For a thread which hasn't seen activity since March 9th 2014.
So I guess he's gotten bored with nailing the new guy's and is now digging up shit that was likely on page 50 of the forums.
Chances are then it will be due to which country or area you are from since all these 'official' streaming sites have incredibly stupid licensing laws, I recommend going through some proxies and use torrent sites instead if you're talking about the hulu service I'm thinking of. As for asking someone else to put their details on an account for you regardless of paying them Bitcoin that's dodgy as fuck and fraud, if something happens not only will it be pointless contacting support you could also get the person who registered you in trouble as well because they will have faked identities.
You're asking for a hell of a lot of unnecessary trouble for even bothering to come up with this.
You're asking for a hell of a lot of unnecessary trouble for even bothering to come up with this.
While he's certainly caught quite a high number of potential scammers with a number of them complaining on the board, dare I ask why you were wanting to buy a Hulu account and why did you feel the need to lie about your post code if you were actually going to use it? I'm a great believer in innocent until proven guilty and I understand not wanting to give out real information on a purely digital transaction, I regularly fake my details for that and provide misleading information because in reality the company or person has no reason to require it. However there are some really shifty fuckers around here who always like to play innnocent and blame the victims in an attempt to manipulate people so don't be offended if I haven't immediately sided with you.
I'm unsure where inlied about a god damn thing?There's a method where you remove the letters from your real postal code and use your Canadian credit card.
you add two zeroes.
My postal.code is r0e0k0
If I remove the letters I get 000 if I add two more zeros.
I get 00000
Which won't work, so I was asking to buy an account with bitcoin from someone.
I simply made the statement to show I already tried my own credit card
But please, tell me where I lied to anyone or misrepresented my postal code or any anything else.
I simply said it didn't work as my postal code had 000
While he's certainly caught quite a high number of potential scammers with a number of them complaining on the board, dare I ask why you were wanting to buy a Hulu account and why did you feel the need to lie about your post code if you were actually going to use it? I'm a great believer in innocent until proven guilty and I understand not wanting to give out real information on a purely digital transaction, I regularly fake my details for that and provide misleading information because in reality the company or person has no reason to require it. However there are some really shifty fuckers around here who always like to play innnocent and blame the victims in an attempt to manipulate people so don't be offended if I haven't immediately sided with you.
I have to say this is one of Vod's stranger negative ratings. I think it was pretty clear why you were lying about your postal code, eg in order to use a service you would otherwise be unable to use.
Yeah, this negative seems overkill here. A neutral at most but even that seems unnecessary. I'm sure vod will remove it.
I'm unsure why the mod and admin team leave this so open.
Someone should not be allowed to leave feedback, good bad or neutral without having done a deal or been involved with a person.
Someone should not be allowed to leave feedback, good bad or neutral without having done a deal or been involved with a person.
So scammers have to successfully scam before they get negative? That's not going to stop anyone from getting scammed, but people need to make sure there's reasonable evidence or behavior of a scam or fraud etc before they leave feedback.
Well sometimes yes, user's should be able to pick up on the common things.
But I can agree flagging posts which clearly look like a scam isn't a bad idea. So it has it's room, but He seems to only visit the forums for this reason.
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I have to say this is one of Vod's stranger negative ratings. I think it was pretty clear why you were lying about your postal code, eg in order to use a service you would otherwise be unable to use.
Yeah, this negative seems overkill here. A neutral at most but even that seems unnecessary. I'm sure vod will remove it.
I'm unsure why the mod and admin team leave this so open.
Someone should not be allowed to leave feedback, good bad or neutral without having done a deal or been involved with a person.
Someone should not be allowed to leave feedback, good bad or neutral without having done a deal or been involved with a person.
So scammers have to successfully scam before they get negative? That's not going to stop anyone from getting scammed, but people need to make sure there's reasonable evidence or behavior of a scam or fraud etc before they leave feedback.
Jump to: