Topic: Who will win WW3? - page 40. (Read 66680 times)

i agree with this.
I still believe that the next World War will be between the ISIS and the Western nations. Leaders of Russia and the United States are not that stupid to fight against each other. Even if they fight against each other.
ISIS is now the major of violenece and will make WW3 more atractive.

The Eastern and Western blocks no longer exist. Some of the Eastern block nations, such as Poland and Romania are solidly behind the NATO now. And some of the former Western block nations, such as Greece and Portugal can no longer be considered as the vassal states of the US. Most of these countries are likely to remain neutral in case of a WW3.

And vodka.

Stick to living in the mountains. In America, there are the Rockies and the Appalachians that are best. In Russia, the Urals. China is full of mountains.

Mountainous terrain helps to block nuclear.

If ww3 really happen between eastern and western block, and nukes and other weapons of mass destruction will be used, we all lose. There is already enough nukes to destroy life on earth multiple times. Chances to ww3 stay conventional are 0 so i hope that will never happen.

This is a little like financial investments. When the stocks go down, and there are great losses published in the media, nobody seems to remember that there are the winners who are getting the money that other people lose.

So, who is getting what we lose when we lose the war for humanization?

The 3rd world war is already being fought a long time... one thing is for sure... we as humans are loosing the war for humanization...

That's precisely my point.

America isn't designed to conquer other nations, America was designed only to defend against invasion. If Vietnam were supported by "most" American people, there wouldn't have been a draft, or mass civil disobedience, or people choosing potential imprisonment rather than conscription. Vietnam was truly supported by a minuscule minority of Americans, even the soldiers forced to be there felt abandoned by America, and it led to rampant suicide. It's just another example of government officials acting in self-interest against the will of the American people.

The Persian Gulf was recognized as a decisive victory, and yet again it was fought by only 425,000 American personnel, and it didn't have the motivation of the American people behind it either. The American people have been caught in a transition from trusting government into distrusting government. People were more trusting back in the early 90's compared with today...

Iraq and Afghanistan are also examples of extremely limited public support in real terms. The American people overwhelmingly supported a war against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, but had no interest in going to war with Iraq. The American public en mass also recognizes measured responses, human rights with regard to the use of lethal force, and logic. There was no great need to rally the war effort within society against Al Qaeda because ample capability was already present within the US military to win against Al Qaeda. The will of the public isn't what you hear on the TV, it's the mentality of the people within society; the actions and interactions of mass numbers of individuals.

You'll know it if the American public ever truly supports a war when the number of Americans insisting on fighting outpaces the tactical capabilities of the US military to supply them all to the battlefield. When they start acting individually and independently of the military towards accomplishing those ends, even paying their own expenses to fight. That's the only time when America has the power to assert massive force, when it's obviously necessary for protection or defense.

World War 2 threatened the substance of what was America, in the eyes of most Americans, the consequences of losing World War 2 would've been worse than death, or enslavement. It was the thought of genocide, the extinction of the American philosophy that drove the effort. That's the essence of America. When the American people decide to make a movement, the government can only watch it unfold and assist with logistics. Whenever a cause is great enough that the American people mobilize themselves, the government is below powerless to resist it, any government resistance becomes irrelevant (not to mention hazardous to the officials posing the resistance). America is very different from the rest of the world in this regard, we often fail to recognize the cultural differences between societies. This is one of the cultural differences that separates Americans from the rest of the world.

Americans are still alive in America, and while America has enemies on the inside, we understand never to draw first blood. It's not the American way to abandon diplomacy before the lines are drawn. These wars aren't what America wants, and the powers responsible for perpetuating them are acting in desperation. America is weak without the motivation of its people, and unbelievably strong when the need arises.

The American system creates a massive inclination towards the defensive capability of the people. The American forces available to be used for aggression are insignificant and pale in comparison with the American forces who refuse to fight for the wrong reasons.

I'm not at all saying that America is better than anywhere else, it's got major issues popping up. I'm simply saying that the true strength of America hasn't been seen since the close of World War 2, and it'll never be summoned for transient causes, or for drawing first blood. That's not to say it can never be tricked, but it's only getting more and more difficult for TPTB as time goes on...

Then that will be a good news. Most of the American politicians who support the invasion of the smaller countries happen to be ultra-religious nuts such as John McCain, Marco Rubio, and Jeb Bush. And as more and more Americans become homosexual and HIV positive, they will become incapable of  waging any more wars.

So they weren't interested in going to Vietnam, Persian Gulf, Iraq and Afghanistan. Those wars were mostly supported by American people, especially Iraq after 9.11. In the last century the USA has not actually defended their homeland at all, but spent years fighting abroad.

The USA was never intended to be an empire, there's exponentially more defensive capability in the USA than offensive. The people aren't interested in fighting overseas when we feel secure at home in the mainland. Fighting overseas can only be done by a small minority of Americans. Without the will of the public, America is weak. America is only strong when the people believe in a just and necessary cause. The people don't support more war, and won't unless they feel threatened militarily. Since 2001 it's become clear to so many living here how things can only get worse until we start seeking diplomatic solutions...

Also, we all know how controlled the mainstream media is here, they don't show you the "average" American, they present an image of whatever supports their agenda... Honestly, I'm confident that we could decimate ISIS over a weekend if all the deer hunters in Alabama got together...

My point is, America as a nation has no will to fight in World War 3. America cannot win, nor lose. It's a clear stalemate (nuclear weapons can't be used or everybody dies).

Just imagine the horror of being a soldier unlucky enough to invade the American mainland. We're stuck in a scenario in geopolitics where conventional armies will be worse than ineffective, nukes are suicidal, and the groups responsible for instigating violence and inciting this hatred and war don't have the support necessary to conquer their adversaries overseas, and so they resort to mercenary and proxy armies. The American people generally aren't aggressive, but are very defensive, very supportive, and very stubborn. We'll see what happens when these waves of deflation cause a hyper-inflationary dollar. I believe that's the next stage in this (on the way to a global currency)...

So the only way to survive World War 3 is to prevent it with diplomacy. We'll see where the American public wants to go when times get tough.

Oh well every one is saying that China and Russian well win.
Well The Cold War was WW3 right? or I don't know.
I just don't want war, because there will be a lot of blood.

i think Russia and china would win (with a few more countries on their side)...but the win would only worth if everything is not destroyed... use of nuclear chemical and biological weapons would cause mass destruction......

USA is becoming a homosexual sodomite country which runs World's sodomites. Russia is trying to save at least it's own citizens to become sodomites.
Citizens of USA are becoming more and more weak and hedonistic, they can't fight any wars soon.

With the dying off of Russian people who were adults at the time of the Bolshevik take-over, there are becoming fewer and fewer Christians in Russia. There have always been few Christians in China. IF Americans remaining with God, and turn to Him rather than falling away from Him, they will become supremely strong. But the same is true for Russians, and could be for Chinese... or those of any other country.

It isn't military might that makes a country strong. It is God that makes and keeps countries of His choice strong.

Exactly. Russia is huge and it's population is not dense, people there are used to very hard times plus Russian government owns lots of gold.

Russia has been tested a lot of times during different wars for last 3 centuries. On the other hand, USA can only invade small weak countries and even then they lose pretty often. China has enormous human resources, there are no that much weapon to kill them all without making a polished glass ball of the Earth.

I am interested why alot of people vote for Russian and China?
Why do you think they will win?
Well I vote US, because is close to me and that is just scary if WW3 happen.

Yah , if that happends I am just scared. A lot of people well die and just stupid to do a war.

If they do wr just do it in the see -.-