If the developer was serious about securing their blockchain they could at least have made it merged mined alongside bitcoin.
There would still be the problem of how to convince miners and pools to add it to their merge, but at least yoyu would not be making the chain insanely expensive to secure not asking miners to abandon all their existing interests in cryptocurrency in order to undermine all their existing interests in cryptocurrency for the purpose of, what, exactly? What business plans that could work using digitalcoin could not work using bitcoin? Surely any business that could run a digitalcoin daemon on its back end could just as easily use a bitcoin daemon instead?
So why not make one's business plans able to use existing currencies instead of undermining the whole concept of cryptocurrencies by not only spanwning yet another coin but also ensuring that securing it would require undermining the security of other existing coins?
It seems hypocritical to complain about being undermined when your entire strategy is itself to undermine...
Basically the moron made the stupid idiot newbie mistake of using an untenable system from the start. The whole concept is broken from inception.
The very first consideration needs to be "how can I ensure my blockchain has more than half of the hashing power this planet is capable of generating".
Using scrypt is not the way to do that.
Proof of work is insanely insanely expensive.
It is insane that the world is blowing as much power as it is already just to secure the SHA256 merged mined family of chains, it is even more insane to propose starting a whole 'nother such expenditure, but that too was already done by tenebrix then fairbrix then litecoin and now, even despite those idiocies, also by digitalcoin.
Total moronic idiocy.
Or, much more believable: deliberate scam with malice aforethought.
(The forethought was long done by the time whatever moronic scammer came up with digitalcoin to make it dubious to claim they did not have the benefit of that forethought.)
-MarkM-
I wouldn't rule out DGC being started by a hobbyist, if Baritus started DGC with the intent to scam people out of money it would have been premined or heavily instamined. From my interactions with him he seems genuinely thrilled with the concept of cryptocurrencies. I agree with what you're saying about the state of altcoins but these personal attacks are not really warranted. To be preemptive, if you're referring to the 560k 'theft' it is a moot point; with DGC's price history there would have been plenty of better opportunities to dump that much coin. Also the lowered block reward was done at the behest of the community, he had actually asked us earlier and everyone said no (fear of backlash like this), but as time passed and DGC kept getting dumped everyone involved changed their minds.
Right now I'm mostly sitting in PPC
but I have a fond space for DGC, it is still one of the more honest attempts at crypto. But in the end I have to agree, this whole altcoin scene is getting ridiculous. The only real 'benefit' I can see from it all is that it helps spread BTC around to people who weren't lucky to get in early.
It is depressing that such revolutionary technology is being retarded with what is basically just plain greed. I'm learning a lot watching cryptocurrencies.