Pages:
Author

Topic: why aren't we, the community, regularly paying the lead developers of bitcoin? - page 2. (Read 5007 times)

hero member
Activity: 523
Merit: 500


The point I clearly didn't make is that it's no surprise that Starbucks accepts things like Square because those are just improved technologies propping up the status quo.

Bitcoin is helping to build an entirely new economic model from the ground up.

Square plans to disrupt the retail payments market.  Merchant acceptance is what will bring users onboard.  There's no expensive infrastructue so merchants can adopt it with little risk.  It's becoming a common strategy.

Bitcoin will only ever be a niche currency until it's user-friendly - no matter how sound it is.  It could be being used as a leap frog technology in developing nations right now if it wasn't so cumbersome.  More user-friendly systems requiring only a smartphone already exist - Bitcoin needs to lift its game if it wants to compete in the payments market and not just be a speculative commodity until something shinier comes along.

Bitcoin creditcards? Bitcoin wallets like Bitcoinspinner for Android, super easy to use webwallets like coinbase and mywallet at blockchain.info.
Sending Bitcoins, via twitter, email, facebook...
sr. member
Activity: 431
Merit: 251

That said... stay tuned, and I'll say more when I can.


oh my god we just figured out the announcement!


My guess would be that the project is going to be picked up by some OSS foundation - Apache maybe?
donator
Activity: 1464
Merit: 1047
I outlived my lifetime membership:)
Hopefully the devs have a stake in Bitcoin from being early adopters...thus, they work to increase the value of their own coin. Also, it's not just devs that make Bitcoin valuable. Perhaps we should pay magicaltux, Charlie at bitinstant, coinabul, Casascius, Matthew, etc.
vip
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.

That said... stay tuned, and I'll say more when I can.



Where have we heard that before?  Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
What would be cool is if mining pool's gives the option to miners to donate some funds to a shared developers bitcoin wallet.

Then at the end of each release, the funds inside that address will be automatically divided equally based on criteria possibly such as:

1) the number of commits
2) number of lines written
3) Im not sure if its possible to gauge the severity or importance of a fix.

those qualifiers are not good signs of quality or useful code.

but what about the idea of bounties for features?

actually i'm not a huge fan of that either, at least not by itself. i really think we should let the devs figure out how they want to break up the money. we just need to give it to them.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
What would be cool is if mining pool's gives the option to miners to donate some funds to a shared developers bitcoin wallet.

Then at the end of each release, the funds inside that address will be automatically divided equally based on criteria possibly such as:

1) the number of commits
2) number of lines written
3) Im not sure if its possible to gauge the severity or importance of a fix.
hero member
Activity: 496
Merit: 500

That said... stay tuned, and I'll say more when I can.


oh my god we just figured out the announcement!


A government is funding bitcoin development!

ITS CANADA!!!!

The US has a secret government run by the CIA  Cheesy

Plus they have a venture capital firm for it.

Now that they've acquired a good portion of Bitcoin economy (Pirate was a CIA agent) they can announce support for it => profit! Smiley
staff
Activity: 4270
Merit: 1209
I support freedom of choice
I think the best way to pay the developers is to invest some time and money to make sure that anyone who has contributed will be remembered. The psychological incentive is more meaningful than money.
*
donator
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001
I think the best way to pay the developers is to invest some time and money to make sure that anyone who has contributed will be remembered. The psychological incentive is more meaningful than money.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Bitcoin is a labor of love, they do it because they want to take power away from the big banks and big government.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
I've said that I think the download-and-install-software-on-your-PC is a mostly-dead way of using software, and that the vast majority of people using Bitcoin in a year or three will be using it via a web application or on their smart phone. That's half of the reason why I don't think improving the UI is a high priority right now (the other half is because I think solving wallet security and backup issues is critical).

people have been saying that for years and years already. i hope it isn't true.

I think Gavin's essentially right about the future of software but has over-estimated the time-frame.  People want the same kind if usability on their smartphones and tablets that they have on their laptops and PCs but they want it now, not in 2 or 3 years.  People don't their computing to be tied down by location any more than they want their telephony to require physical proximity.  There may be congestion issues with mobile computing at the moment, but people are still abandoning fixed internet connections in favour of mobile broadband and phone and tablet computing in droves. All many people need to make the switch total is some killer apps, and that will happen sooner rather than later.

sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Lead Core BitKitty Developer
Haha who's the big backer? Some crazy old people organization? A politcal party? A rebellious business (virgin or ryanair?)?

Somalia = Pirate(s). Guess it all makes sense now.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
I've said that I think the download-and-install-software-on-your-PC is a mostly-dead way of using software, and that the vast majority of people using Bitcoin in a year or three will be using it via a web application or on their smart phone. That's half of the reason why I don't think improving the UI is a high priority right now (the other half is because I think solving wallet security and backup issues is critical).

people have been saying that for years and years already. i hope it isn't true.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat

That said... stay tuned, and I'll say more when I can.


oh my god we just figured out the announcement!


A government is funding bitcoin development!

ITS CANADA!!!!

The US has a secret government run by the CIA  Cheesy

Plus they have a venture capital firm for it.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Haha who's the big backer? Some crazy old people organization? A politcal party? A rebellious business (virgin or ryanair?)?
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1000
Charlie 'Van Bitcoin' Shrem

That said... stay tuned, and I'll say more when I can.


oh my god we just figured out the announcement!


A government is funding bitcoin development!

ITS CANADA!!!!

lol you guessed it...Somalia decided to fund Bitcoin  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250

That said... stay tuned, and I'll say more when I can.


oh my god we just figured out the announcement!


A government is funding bitcoin development!

ITS CANADA!!!!
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1000
Charlie 'Van Bitcoin' Shrem

That said... stay tuned, and I'll say more when I can.


oh my god we just figured out the announcement!

sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
check out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koIq58UoNfE
about 1:25 into the clip:

we don't much care if you don't approve of the software we write.

Well folks, that is how you spin a quote out of context.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


The point I clearly didn't make is that it's no surprise that Starbucks accepts things like Square because those are just improved technologies propping up the status quo.

Bitcoin is helping to build an entirely new economic model from the ground up.

Square plans to disrupt the retail payments market.  Merchant acceptance is what will bring users onboard.  There's no expensive infrastructue so merchants can adopt it with little risk.  It's becoming a common strategy.

Bitcoin will only ever be a niche currency until it's user-friendly - no matter how sound it is.  It could be being used as a leap frog technology in developing nations right now if it wasn't so cumbersome.  More user-friendly systems requiring only a smartphone already exist - Bitcoin needs to lift its game if it wants to compete in the payments market and not just be a speculative commodity until something shinier comes along.
Pages:
Jump to: