1. Bitcoin is independant of our national economies.
2. Bitcoin is an untaxable money supply.
BS! China and Russia banned it. It is taxable every where else, e.g. the USA.
Many newcomers to bitcoin question its 'killer application'. But bitcoin's key use has been here since its very inception -- the end of central banking and the unravelling of the nation state.
Three reasons why bitcoin will end the nation state:
1. Bitcoin is independant of our national economies.
2. Bitcoin is an untaxable money supply.
3. Bitcoin transitions the nature of violence.
Watch the full video at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5xdQPdpLGo&list=PLpWIYlii1DeYim3a9gJDSVh3PZn5kx2YQ&index=11. Bitcoin, as a valued money, corresponds (at least, in part) to “meatspace” economic activity and, therefore, your “national economies.”
2. Transaction fees are a sort of tax, for they are demanded of any that participates in that economy for the supposed sake of its maintenance and “the greater good” of “the end of central banking.”
3. Violence transpires about conviction and a lack thereof: those of whom conviction has demanded violence will be moved to violence still; those of whom a lack thereof would permit them violence will persist in their yielding thereunto.
Many newcomers to bitcoin question its 'killer application'. But bitcoin's key use has been here since its very inception -- the end of central banking and the unravelling of the nation state.
Three reasons why bitcoin will end the nation state:
1. Bitcoin is independant of our national economies.
2. Bitcoin is an untaxable money supply.
3. Bitcoin transitions the nature of violence.
Watch the full video at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5xdQPdpLGo&list=PLpWIYlii1DeYim3a9gJDSVh3PZn5kx2YQ&index=1Sweet dreams my cosmopolitan friend. Isn't it?
Your "reasons" are wrong.
1. BTC isn't independent. It's speculative vehicle and its value basically pegged to fiat.
2. It's taxed everywhere except in countries where it's banned or still under the radar.
3. Violence is for resources. BTC is just yet another resource. No difference.
This argument is flawed... bigtime.
There isn't and I doubt there ever will be an "untaxable" money supply.
1. The price fluctuates and speculators peg its value against the USD. However, the miner who creates new coins themselves, then spends those coins to buy goods, does not touch national currency. The bitcoin economy can, and does (but not always) operate independent of our national economies.
2. For the time being, countries have forced bitcoin into existing frameworks such as a property asset or a commodity. However, who does a miner pay taxes to when he conducts a transaction directly in bitcoin? There exist so many legal loopholes that trying to tax bitcoin as is, is essentially plugging holes in a sinking ship. The only way taxation would be levied effectively is through a supranational type of regulation (perhaps through technology itself rather than judicial) which would look nothing like our national taxation strategies.
3. Currency derives a large part of its value from the force capable of being inflicted or defended from its military force. Think about which military force creates the most violence in the world? When people are using a money supply which cannot be manipulated and money printed, the military industrial complex which these forces thrive on will wither up (not completely disappear), and experience a radical downsizing.
These 3 reasons, among others, are why bitcoin will end the nation state.
Delusional to think a new technology can destroy a government.
Delusional? Consider the technological innovation of gunpowder in feudal times. Organized religion was largely held as the governing body in these times, and we know what happened in the wake of this revolution. Technological developments created strong incentives to downsize governing institutions and lower their costs. A similar technological revolution is happening before our eyes, and is destined to downsize radically the nation state early in the new millennium.