Topic: Why can not I trust ICO-ratings? - page 2. (Read 508 times)
there is no ICO rating site which will 100% tell you good project or not. they just give marks with several parameters. and smart scammers will make everything so that these parameters become good.
In simple words we have price for everything so don't trust anyone blindly because they maybe getting money and giving thoe positive feedbacks on those projects since the ICO becomes a profitable business.So we need to know how to invest on the new projects or just hold your bitcoin for longer term.
I agree with you on that and think the best way is to do your own research and have faith in it delivery , the rating might be paid for and they are also in business to make money , at least there should be a reason for them to rate them which should be open to all if they really want people to believe in the rating .
as many ico scams are out now. especially and they know that it's a good thing to do in this crypto work. and many hackers are taking on the ico's coming out today, so nobody wants to trust investors here. but there are some investors trying to invest in ico's.
I think you can trust but not to all rates, as I noticed popular rating platforms are more oriented on paid rates and reviews, but there are still some platforms which obviously have not paid rates and reviews, so they might be trusted. For example: www.icoguide.com
agree with your opinion on the popular platforms. And it would be great if they will change their attitude to the issue, as their not fair rates make problems to the good projects and ideas.
I think you can trust but not to all rates, as I noticed popular rating platforms are more oriented on paid rates and reviews, but there are still some platforms which obviously have not paid rates and reviews, so they might be trusted. For example: www.icoguide.com
ico rating is very good is not a good guarantee if ico will achieve a success and will give you a lot of profits, now many ico pay to get a good rating,
True, Almost every ICO doing this to reach masses.
and for that you have to do your own research before investing, very much ico with a good rating but ico they failed
Unfortunately most of the investors especially newbies only follow shillers/influencer. and we all know how that road ends.
ico rating is very good is not a good guarantee if ico will achieve a success and will give you a lot of profits, now many ico pay to get a good rating, and for that you have to do your own research before investing, very much ico with a good rating but ico they failed
For me, I will not recommend it for anyone because most of these ICO ratings have proven to be false. I have seen a lot of them with top ratings that ended up not being good enough and some with low ratings being better than the former. If you are looking to invest in an ICO, trust your intuitions and own analysis instead, rather than some rating.
I have no experience investing in ICO, but I'm very carefully studying the state of demand for ICO. From all the studied material, I realized ICO-ratings are corrupt girls.
Actually, that ICO ratings is the first thing I would check before I will participate into signature bounty campaign because I consider it as high importance to prevent from joining spam bounty campaigns. Another factor that I would consider is by reviewing the whitepaper to check if it is legitimate and the bounty manager that will handle the project. I would prefer bounty managers with no red trust ratings at least I could feel secure that I am on the right track.
they are subject to fraud, by the analysis and evaluation is only based on several aspects; the assessment may be biased by the unit paid to marketing ICO, ... this is only one element to refer to the user and all investment decisions are in themselves
It's easy. After all, these ratings may be false. You can write anything. Therefore, trust the already proven situation. For example reviews. very good and most important thing available!
Ratings are good, but I look at them last. We have a lot of different ratings that provide sites, but of them only a few that can be trusted. Soon there will be real platforms where there will be an honest rating. 
I believe that most of the reviews we see on the internet are paid. directly or indirectly. if the first case then it's worthless due to their interest and biases but on latter its looks genuine effort from the reviewer with a pinch of salt
it can be useful if you want a quick summary of any project or telegram, site link etc
but investing only based on those so-called reviews. NO!!
it can be useful if you want a quick summary of any project or telegram, site link etc
but investing only based on those so-called reviews. NO!!
I reckon, most of them are paid reviews and ratings, so generally i only trust my own judgement in this market, everybody as an agenda
I also feel distrust of the rating sites. Often observed there fraudulent projects. now I rely only on myself. I analyze the projects myself and take on all responsibility for the selection.
because in my opinion the ICO rating is obtained by paying the ICO rating provider and by voting, then the voting can be obtained only by distributing airdrop for everyone who votes the ICO, so that's why I never believed in the ICO rating.
ICO investment is to take high risks. Should you evaluate an ICO in all aspects and have the application in practice? You should choose an experienced ICO project. It is important to have a strong community in support of the ICO
Because most time they are pay to rate a project so is not that they are really rating the project because of the true potentials. I don't trust information on all the ico rating sites
Jump to: