Pages:
Author

Topic: Why do we have to pass KYC with a cryptocurrency? - page 2. (Read 409 times)

full member
Activity: 507
Merit: 100
The KYC procedure does not have to be mandatory for everyone. it is not right. if I want to take part in the project but do not want to send my place of residence to the network, then why should I do it.
jr. member
Activity: 150
Merit: 1
I totally agree with you. I really don't understand why we have to pass KYC for projects especially when you a bounty hunter. Many projects now requires kyc, releasing vital documents in the name of participating in tokens sale. It's risky, I have been hearing of identity theft and these ICo's KYC issue is one of the things that exposes one to that.
jr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 9
I want to Express my opinion, I am sure that here I will find support among the forum participants, but some will oppose my opinion.
The crypto-currency market is relatively young and as you know it is not regulated by anyone, there are both minuses and pluses in this. So I want to touch on the topic of ICO and KYC in the projects that we invest.

How can someone on behalf of the administrators, project team ICO, which you don't even know, not having officially registered legal address, the presence of which is in the Internet to confirm your personal, confidential information, including your passport, identity card, driving license or an invoice for payment of utilities!

I agree that in this way, large TOP projects are trying to protect themselves from a large number of scams and exclude the use of false accounts, but this is a very unreliable way to exclude such cases! A scan of the passport, documents, place of residence in my opinion is overkill, as a last resort even soglashus selfie with your passport and the date to eliminate the use of your passport by other persons.
What if these people you trust are scammers? What if these people are connected to terrorists and are looking for real dates to forge documents? And what if your photo will be used in the porn industry or on suspicious sites? Yes, I do have a lot of questions because we provide our data to strangers in a safe way to make a profit.
You will not be able to prove his innocence in any case if something of the above suddenly happen to you. Therefore, while the cryptocurrency market is not regulated by the organization have no right to require you to scan your documents!
Moreover, very often projects resort to passing the KYC after you have bought tokens and to pick up you need to pass the test. I hope that such projects as Komodo will help us to go another way and start implementing decentralized ICO.

My conspiracy self says it's all just another way for the .govs to monitor, track, and know what you are doing.

Period. 

Them having total control over us is paramount to them.

Your point is valid regarding personal information and thieves.  From that angle, it would seem the .govs know it is risky for individuals to put out their personal info, yet they make it a requirement in many cases.  Hmm.

Kind of sort of sounds like far greater importance is placed on the actual bulk collection of the data rather than the safety of the individuals involved. 

And pray tell, just who are they protecting us from by demanding KYC?  No one.  KYC is just a government imposed regulation to slow down the adoption of crytocurrencies, plus make it easier for the .govs to organize their files on people.  In other words, they want Wall Street alone to have the monopoly on your money and the right to steal it.  Sound familiar?
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 512
KYC is for the team to avoid unnecessary conflict with the SEC and other Government agencies. SEC says ICOs are Securities but most of these developers do not want that, so they need to prevent US Citizens and other countries where they could fall foul of this regulations not to invest in their project and how do you do this if not by conducting KYCs
full member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 129
I think Kyc itself as a prerequisite to get bounty rewards is a huge scam on it's own being perpetrated by the ICO team and maybe bounty manager. Undergoing Kyc is very risky and I hope there is regulation in the crypto industry
This is not true. In the absence of some other disadvantages of introducing KYC, KYC for bounty hunters can help curb cheaters and multiple alt account holders. from my experience, I have discovered that most bounty that introduce KYC for bounty hunters do not usually have many participants compare to those one that doesnt. this is largely due to the factors that the Op have explained and also due to inability of cheaters not be able to get their reward if they participate.
full member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 129
I respect your opinion concerning release of some vital document to third party all in the name of participating in token sales but as we all know it that some project are operating within countries that strictly into regulating cryptocurrency and some countries also require this before company can be setup. Even though there are many scam ICO I believe that there are still legit one that are fully register in the business location and are fully in compliance to rules and regulation within licence is issued.
full member
Activity: 504
Merit: 100
Powered by Artificial Intelligence & Human Experts
There is no reason to do so except for the fact that the government wants to know what kind of money people are making because if they do not know what you are making then they do not have anyway to actually tax it. Also there are some projects who do it so they can have the identity of people which they can later sell on the black market for cash
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 114
It's a teams prerogative to have KYC, they're almost certainly doing it because they're required to do so by some governing body. It's work and cost for them also so they'll avoid doing it if possible. It needs to be accepted that the crypto market will become more and more regulated in time.
jr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 1
I think Kyc itself as a prerequisite to get bounty rewards is a huge scam on it's own being perpetrated by the ICO team and maybe bounty manager. Undergoing Kyc is very risky and I hope there is regulation in the crypto industry
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
take & Vote or Become a IoTeX Delegate!
Well I think the whole issue of KYC is because of the regulations going on with the space, the truth is that most of these projects are residing in a country and they are trying to protect the project and that's what brings about the whole kyc issues, leave the team with their choice, they won't demand kyc because it takes them time and resources.
jr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 2
I beg you. People in 2018. KYC procedure is not protection. This is not a guarantee, even if the entire project team passes the test. If a team of hunters will be tested. And investors will be tested. KYC - where are the guarantees that the documents are not fake. Where are the guarantees that the documents are not purchased. Where at least any guarantee. I am not a KYC. Our data later come to mashenikam. And they just sell them. That's all. Especially Ardrops.
jr. member
Activity: 143
Merit: 1
I agree with you. Today our data many from whom there are. We often have to reveal our identity. Banks, airlines, even some stores. we make purchases in Applestore and everyone wants our data. then we get a lot of spam. and then we can find out that someone is shopping in your name. And I am against the fact that these projects want my data and therefore I do not participate in such companies.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 105
I fully agree with the author of the post. But I want to say a few words.
The ICO organizers do not force you to go through this procedure, if you are willing to participate in their project, then go through, if you do not want to go through this procedure, then choose another project.
I am sure that in the future regulators should pay attention to this.
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 10
it's good that it's a risk, but if we weren't this procedure, we wouldn't get its reward, it's a shame, but not always the documents we provide, and are afraid to send their data are not included in the coma.
member
Activity: 442
Merit: 11
I agree that the provision of their documents in the projects is not necessary, especially for participants who participate only in bounty companies! If you do not invest in the project and only work on advertising the project for which the organization to provide your documents. They can easily fake and show a lie, this measure will not save from the influx of participants of the bounty, and investors do not necessarily provide their personal data.
KYC is one of the most embarrassing procedures for getting a bounty reward.
 One can understand when easy kyc is carried out to confirm that.  To get rid of the bot accounts.  But when they require almost the entire package of documents, this is already overkill.  Many people are left without a well-deserved reward, just because they do not want to risk it.  After all, when sending documents it is not clear to whom, this is a huge risk.
jr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 4
I agree that the provision of their documents in the projects is not necessary, especially for participants who participate only in bounty companies! If you do not invest in the project and only work on advertising the project for which the organization to provide your documents. They can easily fake and show a lie, this measure will not save from the influx of participants of the bounty, and investors do not necessarily provide their personal data.
jr. member
Activity: 123
Merit: 8
I want to Express my opinion, I am sure that here I will find support among the forum participants, but some will oppose my opinion.
The crypto-currency market is relatively young and as you know it is not regulated by anyone, there are both minuses and pluses in this. So I want to touch on the topic of ICO and KYC in the projects that we invest.

How can someone on behalf of the administrators, project team ICO, which you don't even know, not having officially registered legal address, the presence of which is in the Internet to confirm your personal, confidential information, including your passport, identity card, driving license or an invoice for payment of utilities!

I agree that in this way, large TOP projects are trying to protect themselves from a large number of scams and exclude the use of false accounts, but this is a very unreliable way to exclude such cases! A scan of the passport, documents, place of residence in my opinion is overkill, as a last resort even soglashus selfie with your passport and the date to eliminate the use of your passport by other persons.
What if these people you trust are scammers? What if these people are connected to terrorists and are looking for real dates to forge documents? And what if your photo will be used in the porn industry or on suspicious sites? Yes, I do have a lot of questions because we provide our data to strangers in a safe way to make a profit.
You will not be able to prove his innocence in any case if something of the above suddenly happen to you. Therefore, while the cryptocurrency market is not regulated by the organization have no right to require you to scan your documents!
Moreover, very often projects resort to passing the KYC after you have bought tokens and to pick up you need to pass the test. I hope that such projects as Komodo will help us to go another way and start implementing decentralized ICO.
Pages:
Jump to: