Pages:
Author

Topic: Why does Bitcoin not implement anon? - page 3. (Read 4877 times)

sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
June 12, 2014, 11:34:03 AM
#6
If they would implement such feature, I am pretty sure government would have easily destroyed them by now. Just see what happened to liberty reserve.

Them? They?

Liberty Reserve was centralized, it was easy. Bitcoin would survive, but exchanges and mainstream adoption would suffer so it wouldn't be the best idea probably. It's best to have a separate cryptocurrency for true anonymity.
full member
Activity: 122
Merit: 100
June 12, 2014, 11:26:43 AM
#5
If they would implement such feature, I am pretty sure government would have easily destroyed them by now. Just see what happened to liberty reserve.
sr. member
Activity: 281
Merit: 250
June 11, 2014, 11:55:45 PM
#4
If someone owns 51% he could do double spend attacks and destroy the integrity of the btc network.
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
June 11, 2014, 05:56:12 PM
#3
It would go against what BTC has come to be seen as...a transparent currency. Implementing anonymity features In the protocol(not 3rd party) would probably result in it's death imo.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
June 11, 2014, 04:26:13 PM
#2
why don't u put a pull request
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
June 11, 2014, 03:07:27 PM
#1
Why does Bitcoin not implement anonymous transactions feature? It would definitely be huge if it is implemented!

Also, if such features are not implemented what does BTC have apart from being the first and accepted by a large number of merchants? So why not implement the newest features from altcoins?
Pages:
Jump to: