Pages:
Author

Topic: Why Does the Far Right Hold a Near-Monopoly on Political Violence? (Read 358 times)

member
Activity: 183
Merit: 43
You keep confusing your personal belief with political sides...  Roll Eyes

All Communism States will end in Fascism, Fascism is a consequence of Communism (even Mussolini was a Communist leader before). Now I'm short in time, but if you read the Economy Socialist Class it explains why this happen, why Communism brings nothing but famine and why its leaders will either resource Fascism or die.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1756
Verified Bernie Bro - Feel The Bern!
Actually that's because as soon as shit hits the fan, left wing (which means nothing) will start to claim that is right wing (which means also nothing).
Left wing doesn't see Kim Jong-un as left, nor Maduro.

Kim Jong-Un isn't left... he is a totalitarian dictator (fascist)... as far right as the spectrum goes...

Now now, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a Democracy says so right in the name!
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
Actually that's because as soon as shit hits the fan, left wing (which means nothing) will start to claim that is right wing (which means also nothing).
Left wing doesn't see Kim Jong-un as left, nor Maduro.

Kim Jong-Un isn't left... he is a totalitarian dictator (fascist)... as far right as the spectrum goes...

The reason authoritarianism is on the right is because republicans are authoritarian, democrats want democracy where the majority opinion is what matters... republicans prefer the whim of some ruler over the majority opinion of the populace

I also put Trump in the same category as Kim Jong-Un... Trump wants to rule by decree (i.e. dictating laws)... Trump has no interest in what the majority of people of his country want... Trump worships Kim Jong-Un because he is a dictator, and Trump wants to be just like him
member
Activity: 183
Merit: 43
Actually that's because as soon as shit hits the fan, left wing (which means nothing) will start to claim that is right wing (which means also nothing).
Left wing doesn't see Kim Jong-un as left, nor Maduro.

The great advantage of a good for nothing split system is that supporters, specially the extremists, from one side and another won't gather around while enjoying beating each other's.
Likewise we get the ultimate chair rotation at the system, Democrats, who had policies that would be considered hard or far right are now "lefties", Republicans went the other way around, and probably 100 years from now people will see them again in the opposite ends... Enjoy the divide to conquer system!
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
They're most-associated with violence because for their ideologies to work, there needs to be fear and hate in the air. Most far-rights are hell-bent capitalists and many profit off of America's permanent war economy.

The far right has to use force to keep the far left from destroying itself.

Cool
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 2
No one look at Communism btw, those hundreds of millions of dead don't count as leftist violence!

umm... got a source for that?

There isn't any war in history where "hundreds of millions" died... that simply never happened

Are you adding up the deaths from every war combined, and blaming it all on "leftists"?

I agree there isn't any war where hundreds of millions died. There is however this fact that communism in general claimed the death of many people...100 million or more... We are talking about politically motivated deaths; as it happened in the USSR with the holodomor (there is a lot of literature about it), there was the war against the Polish minority which was forcefully resettled to Siberia/Kazakhstan, Tartar people too were re-settled, sent in Gulags, suffered from death marches, from so-called 'hearings'. People who were accused of being a class enemy were sent to institutions, prisons, gulags or just had an 'accident'.

Pol Pot killed 1/3 of his country's population... Mao is however in total numbers on the top. If those three are taken together, we are in fact approaching the 100 million, perhaps even surpassing it. It was not just from war, but for political reasons. People who didn't fit a certain communist ideal were removed, forgotten, killed and replaced.
 
And strictly speaking communism is left, so blaming it on leftists isn't wrong.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
No one look at Communism btw, those hundreds of millions of dead don't count as leftist violence!

umm... got a source for that?

There isn't any war in history where "hundreds of millions" died... that simply never happened

Are you adding up the deaths from every war combined, and blaming it all on "leftists"?

https://www.victimsofcommunism.org/

Their estimates are conservative, and this is just for Communism.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
For example John McCain (which is considered as a "hero" by many Democrats) has been "fighting terrorism" while being in a close friendship with Saudi Arabia. Maybe it is better to fight terrorism whey you are inside their system?
I'm sure that everything could be way worse if another candidate, which received huge donations from Saudi Arabia during her elections, won the elections.

McCain was a life long Republican and he was not a moderate.  McCain was respected by Dems for being a war hero and an honest public servant, (that doesn't mean they agreed with all of his policies) that was willing to stand up to Trump when he felt Trump went to far.

He was a liberal, and he was used by Democrats when he was useful.

There was a sugar coated "respect cuz war hero". That was totally fake.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
No one look at Communism btw, those hundreds of millions of dead don't count as leftist violence!

umm... got a source for that?

There isn't any war in history where "hundreds of millions" died... that simply never happened

Are you adding up the deaths from every war combined, and blaming it all on "leftists"?
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
I'm not blaming anyone.
Once again: I'm just saying that the current situations could be much worse if Hillary Clinton and Democrats (which still plays an important role in the US establishment and planning to take part in next elections, she is pretty far from being "nobody") were in charge of the country.
Anyway, today's global politics is an insanely dirty thing, no matter which party is having the majority.

Hillary Clinton is a wannabe republican... she is well-known as a "war-hawk" and is not typical of democrats... her policies were more right-wing than left-wing... she claimed to be a "centrist", but acted more like a Republican than a Democrat (sellout to all the special interests like war, pharmaceuticals, etc)
She was so right that she decided to increase income taxes. Increase welfare and open borders for immigrants (what democrats were continuously doing for the last years).
Typical right-wing behavior.

Don't bother trying to argue with these people. They came here to circle jerk each other and normalize each others behavior. They have no desire for an accurate examination of reality, they are here to virtue signal how superior they think they are and how evil they think the right is. No one look at Communism btw, those hundreds of millions of dead don't count as leftist violence! Just like Hillary Clinton or anyone else who counters the narrative of exclusively right violence.
full member
Activity: 924
Merit: 148
I'm not blaming anyone.
Once again: I'm just saying that the current situations could be much worse if Hillary Clinton and Democrats (which still plays an important role in the US establishment and planning to take part in next elections, she is pretty far from being "nobody") were in charge of the country.
Anyway, today's global politics is an insanely dirty thing, no matter which party is having the majority.

Hillary Clinton is a wannabe republican... she is well-known as a "war-hawk" and is not typical of democrats... her policies were more right-wing than left-wing... she claimed to be a "centrist", but acted more like a Republican than a Democrat (sellout to all the special interests like war, pharmaceuticals, etc)
She was so right that she decided to increase income taxes. Increase welfare and open borders for immigrants (what democrats were continuously doing over the last years).
Typical right-wing behavior.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
Republicans create terrorists
Any proofs?
IMHO democrats are in close friendship with Saudi Arabia (and also receiving donations from them during US elections) which is the main sponsor of terrorism in its region.
Democrats were working with terrorists in the past. They are way closer to terrorism rather than democrats.

So you think a democratic president flew his son-in-law to Saudi Arabia to personally negotiate a $110 billion weapons deal... Jared Cushner even called the CEO of Lockheed Martin to personally negotiate a better deal for Saudi Arabia on war-planes!
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/world/middleeast/jared-kushner-saudi-arabia-arms-deal-lockheed.html

Trump applied and received a dozen licenses for new businesses from Saudi Arabia while he was running for president, before even being elected
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/306990-trump-appeared-to-register-eight-companies-in-saudi-arabia

Saudi Arabia paid Trump $270,000 to stay in his hotel (paying way more than the going rate = bribe)
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/06/president-trumps-dc-hotel-received-270000-from-saudi-arabia.html


Trump (and the republicans) have been in bed with Saudi Arabia since day fucking one... don't blame democrats for this bullshit

Surely there is nothing good in those points. But leftists usually use it just to blame trump. They always decide to be pacifists (only on words) when they need. It is nothing but lies. For example John McCain (which is considered as a "hero" by many Democrats) has been "fighting terrorism" while being in a close friendship with Saudi Arabia. Maybe it is better to fight terrorism whey you are inside their system?
I'm sure that everything could be way worse if another candidate, which received huge donations from Saudi Arabia during her elections, won the elections.

Hillary Clinton is a wannabe republican... she is well-known as a "war-hawk" and is not typical of democrats... her policies were more right-wing than left-wing... she claimed to be a "centrist", but acted more like a Republican than a Democrat (sellout to all the special interests like war, pharmaceuticals, etc)

It truly amazes me that you can blame Hillary Clinton, who is a nobody these days... and democrats, who aren't in control of anything... rather than the people actually in control of our foreign policy (Trump and the republicans)
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1756
Verified Bernie Bro - Feel The Bern!
For example John McCain (which is considered as a "hero" by many Democrats) has been "fighting terrorism" while being in a close friendship with Saudi Arabia. Maybe it is better to fight terrorism whey you are inside their system?
I'm sure that everything could be way worse if another candidate, which received huge donations from Saudi Arabia during her elections, won the elections.

McCain was a life long Republican and he was not a moderate.  McCain was respected by Dems for being a war hero and an honest public servant, (that doesn't mean they agreed with all of his policies) that was willing to stand up to Trump when he felt Trump went to far.
full member
Activity: 924
Merit: 148
Republicans create terrorists
Any proofs?
IMHO democrats are in close friendship with Saudi Arabia (and also receiving donations from them during US elections) which is the main sponsor of terrorism in its region.
Democrats were working with terrorists in the past. They are way closer to terrorism rather than democrats.

So you think a democratic president flew his son-in-law to Saudi Arabia to personally negotiate a $110 billion weapons deal... Jared Cushner even called the CEO of Lockheed Martin to personally negotiate a better deal for Saudi Arabia on war-planes!
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/world/middleeast/jared-kushner-saudi-arabia-arms-deal-lockheed.html

Trump applied and received a dozen licenses for new businesses from Saudi Arabia while he was running for president, before even being elected
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/306990-trump-appeared-to-register-eight-companies-in-saudi-arabia

Saudi Arabia paid Trump $270,000 to stay in his hotel (paying way more than the going rate = bribe)
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/06/president-trumps-dc-hotel-received-270000-from-saudi-arabia.html


Trump (and the republicans) have been in bed with Saudi Arabia since day fucking one... don't blame democrats for this bullshit

Surely there is nothing good in those points. But leftists usually use it just to blame trump. They always decide to be pacifists (only on words) when they need. It is nothing but lies. For example John McCain (which is considered as a "hero" by many Democrats) has been "fighting terrorism" while being in a close friendship with Saudi Arabia. Maybe it is better to fight terrorism whey you are inside their system?
I'm sure that everything could be way worse if another candidate, which received huge donations from Saudi Arabia during her elections, won the elections.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
Republicans create terrorists
Any proofs?
IMHO democrats are in close friendship with Saudi Arabia (and also receiving donations from them during US elections) which is the main sponsor of terrorism in its region.
Democrats were working with terrorists in the past. They are way closer to terrorism rather than democrats.

So you think a democratic president flew his son-in-law to Saudi Arabia to personally negotiate a $110 billion weapons deal... Jared Cushner even called the CEO of Lockheed Martin to personally negotiate a better deal for Saudi Arabia on war-planes!
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/world/middleeast/jared-kushner-saudi-arabia-arms-deal-lockheed.html

Trump applied and received a dozen licenses for new businesses from Saudi Arabia while he was running for president, before even being elected
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/306990-trump-appeared-to-register-eight-companies-in-saudi-arabia

Saudi Arabia paid Trump $270,000 to stay in his hotel (paying way more than the going rate = bribe)
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/06/president-trumps-dc-hotel-received-270000-from-saudi-arabia.html

Trump (and the republicans) have been in bed with Saudi Arabia since day fucking one... don't blame democrats for this bullshit
full member
Activity: 924
Merit: 148
Republicans create terrorists
Any proofs?
IMHO democrats are in close friendship with Saudi Arabia (and also receiving donations from them during US elections) which is the main sponsor of terrorism in its region.
Democrats were working with terrorists in the past. They are way closer to terrorism rather than democrats.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
And most extreme left-wingers need war to spread their ideology... So if you don't follow them you used to be counter-revolutionary, later on trotskyist/titoist and nowadays you are 'hateful'...

Left-wingers are opposed to war... where do you get this nonsense?
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 2
And most extreme left-wingers need war to spread their ideology... So if you don't follow them you used to be counter-revolutionary, later on trotskyist/titoist and nowadays you are 'hateful'...
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
Republicans create terrorists, Democrats create Obamacare!  The far right is full of religitards kk nuff said.

You might want to check out who started the KKK...

You should probably check out what political party the current KKK and most other far right mentally deficient Americans support!

That's a cute delusion. BTW, if anyone was wondering the KKK was created by and heavily supported by Democrats.

Are you the only one who doesn't realize that republicans and democrats switched sides during the 1950's?

When the KKK was founded, it was founded by the people who currently belong to the republican party... the KKK has always been far right-wing

This is no different than republicans trying to claim credit for Abraham Lincoln freeing the slaves... sure he was a republican, but back then the parties were reversed, so he was equivalent to a modern day democrat, not a republican... obviously

Please stop trying to mislead people with your ignorance of history

We have a moral duty to be honest. This duty is especially important when we share ideas that can inform or persuade others.

Intellectual honesty is honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas. A person is being intellectually honest when he or she, knowing the truth, states that truth. Intellectual honesty pertains to any communication intended to inform or persuade. This includes all forms of scholarship, consequential conversations such as dialogue, debate, (...)
jr. member
Activity: 114
Merit: 2
They're most-associated with violence because for their ideologies to work, there needs to be fear and hate in the air. Most far-rights are hell-bent capitalists and many profit off of America's permanent war economy.
Pages:
Jump to: