Topic: Why haven't there been any Q&A requests for Satoshi Nakamoto? (Read 2447 times)
What a bunch of dicks. You don't know who Jeff Garzik is? He's one of the admins on this forum. Now I know you're just trolling.
Still feeding the troll R2? Just let this topic die 
Yeah, I think you're right. We've had enough fun.
How is that proof? You're telling me if you just outright asked Jeff Garzik, Gavin Andresen, Chris DeRose, like HONESTLY, they wouldn't tell you the truth?
I don't know those people. I cannot trust people I don't know.
Me signing anything only implies I further developed the community with them other than just writing the initial protocol.
The “creator” of Bitcoin, a protocol heavily based on cryptography, thinks cryptographic proof is not enough.
Hey, think like a human being for a minute, not a machine. And just use some common sense. You don't know them, but they are figures in the Bitcoin community. They didn't just pop out from nowhere. You're talking to Satoshi and you don't even know it?
Still feeding the troll R2? Just let this topic die
How is that proof? You're telling me if you just outright asked Jeff Garzik, Gavin Andresen, Chris DeRose, like HONESTLY, they wouldn't tell you the truth?
I don't know those people. I cannot trust people I don't know.
Me signing anything only implies I further developed the community with them other than just writing the initial protocol.
The “creator” of Bitcoin, a protocol heavily based on cryptography, thinks cryptographic proof is not enough.
The point is: Why do people find it so hard to believe that I'm Satoshi Nakamoto?
Because there's zero proof. The only plausible proof is signing with a key known to be from Satoshi Nakamoto, and you claimed you lost it.
How is that proof? You're telling me if you just outright asked Jeff Garzik, Gavin Andresen, Chris DeRose, like HONESTLY, they wouldn't tell you the truth? Right now, of course, if you ask them, they're afraid they'll lose business or money, but if you really ask them and the early adopters, they'll acknowledge it. Me signing anything only implies I further developed the community with them other than just writing the initial protocol.
The point is: Why do people find it so hard to believe that I'm Satoshi Nakamoto?
Because there's zero proof. The only plausible proof is signing with a key known to be from Satoshi Nakamoto, and you claimed you lost it.
http://blog.eastfist.com/2015/05/02/example-of-bitcoin-community-stupidity-absolute-disrespect-for-satoshi-nakamoto/
Oh, no, Eastfist is making fun of us in his blog? Wait... it's just the full transcript of this thread. What's the point?
Anyway, I post it here to create a feedback loop.
Oh, no, Eastfist is making fun of us in his blog? Wait... it's just the full transcript of this thread. What's the point?
Anyway, I post it here to create a feedback loop.
The point is: Why do people find it so hard to believe that I'm Satoshi Nakamoto? Try to go read Chris DeRose's YouTube comments and see how much respect he has for me. He's about the only guy that will voucher for me. Everyone else pretends to be dumb. Seriously, I can't understand why you don't understand how offensive that is.
http://blog.eastfist.com/2015/05/02/example-of-bitcoin-community-stupidity-absolute-disrespect-for-satoshi-nakamoto/
Oh, no, Eastfist is making fun of us in his blog? Wait... it's just the full transcript of this thread. What's the point?
Anyway, I post it here to create a feedback loop.
Oh, no, Eastfist is making fun of us in his blog? Wait... it's just the full transcript of this thread. What's the point?
Anyway, I post it here to create a feedback loop.
Now, if you really want to know who Eastfist is, just go to his website, www.eastfist.com. It's in his profile.
www.eastfist.com/about
“The Self-Proclaimed Genius”
Oh, God.
LOL. I'm gonna let that sink in a bit. Why a troll would do that. Y'know, declare himself a genius. Then try to mooch off of Satoshi Nakamoto, or "make fun" of him.
Now, if you really want to know who Eastfist is, just go to his website, www.eastfist.com. It's in his profile.
www.eastfist.com/about
“The Self-Proclaimed Genius”
Oh, God.
Read 'em and weap, folks, if you're just joining in this thread now. No questions about how blockchain works, what insight there was into history and other things, just outright badgering and ridicule. And yet, troll users still use Bitcoin, while completely disrespecting inventor. What kind of world do we live in?
Most trolls would claim to be Satoshi only to make fun of him.
That seems exactly what you're doing.
I think you're reading comprehension is really bad. Does it sound like I'm making fun of myself?
Now, if you really want to know who Eastfist is, just go to his website, www.eastfist.com. It's in his profile.
Wow. Seriously? That's "making fun" of Satoshi Nakamoto? I'm telling you the actual truth and it sounds far-fetched? Wow.
Read 'em and weap, folks, if you're just joining in this thread now. No questions about how blockchain works, what insight there was into history and other things, just outright badgering and ridicule. And yet, troll users still use Bitcoin, while completely disrespecting inventor. What kind of world do we live in?
Most trolls would claim to be Satoshi only to make fun of him.
That seems exactly what you're doing.
I think you're reading comprehension is really bad. Does it sound like I'm making fun of myself?
Now, if you really want to know who Eastfist is, just go to his website, www.eastfist.com. It's in his profile.
Read 'em and weap, folks, if you're just joining in this thread now. No questions about how blockchain works, what insight there was into history and other things, just outright badgering and ridicule. And yet, troll users still use Bitcoin, while completely disrespecting inventor. What kind of world do we live in?
Most trolls would claim to be Satoshi only to make fun of him.
That seems exactly what you're doing.
I think you're reading comprehension is really bad. Does it sound like I'm making fun of myself?
1) Your*
2) No. It sounds like Eastfist is making fun of Satoshi Nakamoto.
It's pretty clear you're just antagonizing me now. LOL. Man, this is sad.
Most trolls would claim to be Satoshi only to make fun of him.
That seems exactly what you're doing.
I think you're reading comprehension is really bad. Does it sound like I'm making fun of myself?
1) Your*
2) No. It sounds like Eastfist is making fun of Satoshi Nakamoto.
Most trolls would claim to be Satoshi only to make fun of him.
That seems exactly what you're doing.
I think you're reading comprehension is really bad. Does it sound like I'm making fun of myself?
Most trolls would claim to be Satoshi only to make fun of him.
That seems exactly what you're doing.
It didn't. The whole class just handed it in, and Stefan Molyneux, the instructor, read mine in front of the class (in his "classy" accent), everyone got bedazzled for some reason. Next thing you know, the chancellor's escorting me all over Harding's campus introducing me to a bunch of old dudes in suits, investors. Mind you, I was only 14 years old. They were just using us to solve their politics. FYI, Harding is a math and technology institution, so a lot of wealthy people and tech icons go through there.
How did they know it was your paper, if you handed it under a pseudonym? (according to the assignment? I still find that hard to believe)
C'mon man, it's not completely impractical. I claimed it afterwards. Really, c'mon. If I didn't claim it, how would the chancellor know I wrote it and treat me all special and stuff. Also, it was one of the only papers with Asian pseudonym. There was like only 2 minorities in the class. Who else could it be?
I still don't see the point on having to use a pseudonym as part of the assignment. What purpose did it serve for the class? Was it just for teh lulz? Or, if it wasn't, then asking for who wrote it afterwards would have been immoral.
Wow, someone's in denial. Or antagonizing with motive.
Use some logic: how many people out there are claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto? And why would they? Why would I if it wasn't true? Most trolls would claim to be Satoshi only to make fun of him.
It didn't. The whole class just handed it in, and Stefan Molyneux, the instructor, read mine in front of the class (in his "classy" accent), everyone got bedazzled for some reason. Next thing you know, the chancellor's escorting me all over Harding's campus introducing me to a bunch of old dudes in suits, investors. Mind you, I was only 14 years old. They were just using us to solve their politics. FYI, Harding is a math and technology institution, so a lot of wealthy people and tech icons go through there.
How did they know it was your paper, if you handed it under a pseudonym? (according to the assignment? I still find that hard to believe)
C'mon man, it's not completely impractical. I claimed it afterwards. Really, c'mon. If I didn't claim it, how would the chancellor know I wrote it and treat me all special and stuff. Also, it was one of the only papers with Asian pseudonym. There was like only 2 minorities in the class. Who else could it be?
I still don't see the point on having to use a pseudonym as part of the assignment. What purpose did it serve for the class? Was it just for teh lulz? Or, if it wasn't, then asking for who wrote it afterwards would have been immoral.
Keeping it anonymous was probably to see if there was any bias in how the class would respond. Frankly, I don't know their motive. I think that was the whole point was so they could take advantage of it.
Jump to: