Pages:
Author

Topic: Why is bitcoin not anonymous? - page 2. (Read 451 times)

copper member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1325
I'm sometimes known as "miniadmin"
June 01, 2020, 05:59:48 PM
#7
Nevertheless, the exchange (third party) will know who owns the purchased bitcoins if the identification procedure has been passed.
So this data can fall into the wrong hands by selling data by the exchange or hacking it by hackers, for example.
Others, we are to some extent dependent on third parties, which is not acceptable in cryptocurrency, in my opinion.
The solution to that is really simple: Don't use exchanges.

You can still buy and sell bitcoin to people in your city or use ATMs (2 first things that come to mind). Privacy totally depends on the user; it's easier to trust a third party to manage most of our operations; but at what cost? Google stores our password if we allow it, and then fills the user and password fields automatically. It's fast and convenient; but at what cost?

I'm aware the situations are not 100% identical, but I don't think it's a bad comparison
sr. member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 377
June 01, 2020, 05:56:00 PM
#6
You can't be anonymous if using are using centralized exchanges which request for your documents for verification of KYC to buy and sell bitcoin.
Luckily, there are many more (and anonymous) ways of buying bitcoin. Exchanges are just a service; same than youtube, netflix or a bank. They are not something that comes with the network per se

Nevertheless, the exchange (third party) will know who owns the purchased bitcoins if the identification procedure has been passed.
So this data can fall into the wrong hands by selling data by the exchange or hacking it by hackers, for example.
Others, we are to some extent dependent on third parties, which is not acceptable in cryptocurrency, in my opinion.
copper member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1325
I'm sometimes known as "miniadmin"
June 01, 2020, 05:47:59 PM
#5
There was no point of making the blockchain and all the transactions in it public
Then how could you keep a record that every user has to check to know the balance of their own addresses? Maybe it's possible, but I can't think of a way to make something private in a decentralized network.

You can't be anonymous if using are using centralized exchanges which request for your documents for verification of KYC to buy and sell bitcoin.
Luckily, there are many more (and anonymous) ways of buying bitcoin. Exchanges are just a service; same than youtube, netflix or a bank. They are not something that comes with the network per se
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1261
Heisenberg
June 01, 2020, 05:19:22 PM
#4
There was no point of making the blockchain and all the transactions in it public, yet they intended for the network to be "anonymous"
You can't be anonymous if using are using centralized exchanges which request for your documents for verification of KYC to buy and sell bitcoin.

Only you as a person will choose to determine the level of privacy you would want by avoiding KYC platforms, using Bitcoin Mixers, Using privacy based browsers like Tor etc. Bitcoin itself won't do that for you because the money trail is all public and it can all be traced up to you.
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
June 01, 2020, 05:04:00 PM
#3
I don't know if he intended bitcoin to be anything more than a proof of concept... On the point of privacy, I think there was a plan to make bitcoin anonymous with the hard forks that'll come with making the lightning network more secure... The lightning network also offers some anonymity compared with the regular blockchain however it isn't anywhere near fully anonymous (afaik evaluations of who gains and loses coins can be done for forensics etc).
sr. member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 377
June 01, 2020, 04:55:29 PM
#2
FIRST

Its Satoshi Nakamoto, not Satashi Nakamata.


SECOND

You're wrong. The creator of Bitcoin Satoshi Nakamoto never said that Bitcoin is an anonymous currency.
That's what he says about privacy in  bitcoin's white paper:
Quote
The necessity to announce all transactions publiclyprecludes this method, but privacy can still be maintained by breaking the flow of information inanother place: by keeping public keys anonymous.  
The public can see that someone is sendingan amount to someone else, but without information linking the transaction to anyone.   This issimilar   to   the   level   of   information   released   by   stock   exchanges,   where   the   time   and   size   ofindividual trades, the "tape", is made public, but without telling who the parties were.

So long on the forum and do not know such simple things.  Huh
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
June 01, 2020, 04:49:28 PM
#1
If the creator of Bitcoin Satashi Nakamato created it as an anonymous currency, why does everyone say that it is not anonymous?
Pages:
Jump to: