Since the spam issue has been addressed by mods I am locking this thread before it descends any further.
The politics and society section now has a thread dedicated to this type of discussion if anyone is interested in continuing with it.
Topic: Why is the Politics & Society section so anti-Semitic? (Read 3325 times)
This is false explanation invented by zionists as a harmless and satisfactory answer to hard question.
Banking for profit tolerated in Lutheranism. Large part of europe is lutheranic. And there was virtually no muslims here until collapse of USSR. This does not explain why under such different circumstances the banks still are run by jews here.
Banking for profit tolerated in Lutheranism. Large part of europe is lutheranic. And there was virtually no muslims here until collapse of USSR. This does not explain why under such different circumstances the banks still are run by jews here.
Bigot uses Historical Inaccuracy!
It misses!
It is stupid belief that people with totally different beliefs what is right and wrong and with various and incompatible needs can coexist in same society with everyone being happy. This will not happen. Either almost everyone is unhappy and Orwellian control must be established to prevent disorder. Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
I'm pretty sure Hitler tried that once...didn't work out well. What's so hard about accepting someone different? Oh, right--statism. Carry on.
banks are historically run by jews but not because they want to take over the world. The reason jews run the banks is because usury was outlawed by the catholic church but not in judaism. Since these were basically the only 2 religions in europe at the time and almost everyone fell into one of these two religions it meant that the jews had a monopoly on banking. This then gave the jews an extraordinary competitive advantage which lead to power disproportionate to their numbers and the impression, to outsiders, that they were attempting to take over the world.
Banking for profit tolerated in Lutheranism. Large part of europe is lutheranic. And there was virtually no muslims here until collapse of USSR. This does not explain why under such different circumstances the banks still are run by jews here.
banks are historically run by jews but not because they want to take over the world. The reason jews run the banks is because usury was outlawed by the catholic church but not in judaism. Since these were basically the only 2 religions in europe at the time and almost everyone fell into one of these two religions it meant that the jews had a monopoly on banking. This then gave the jews an extraordinary competitive advantage which lead to power disproportionate to their numbers and the impression, to outsiders, that they were attempting to take over the world.
Anon136 uses Logic!
Bigot is unaffected!
banks are historically run by jews but not because they want to take over the world. The reason jews run the banks is because usury was outlawed by the catholic church but not in judaism. Since these were basically the only 2 religions in europe at the time and almost everyone fell into one of these two religions it meant that the jews had a monopoly on banking. This then gave the jews an extraordinary competitive advantage which lead to power disproportionate to their numbers and the impression, to outsiders, that they were attempting to take over the world.
tl;dr - blame catholicism
lol i thought i had a short attention span
banks are historically run by jews but not because they want to take over the world. The reason jews run the banks is because usury was outlawed by the catholic church but not in judaism. Since these were basically the only 2 religions in europe at the time and almost everyone fell into one of these two religions it meant that the jews had a monopoly on banking. This then gave the jews an extraordinary competitive advantage which lead to power disproportionate to their numbers and the impression, to outsiders, that they were attempting to take over the world.
tl;dr - blame catholicism
It is stupid belief that people with totally different beliefs what is right and wrong and with various and incompatible needs can coexist in same society with everyone being happy. This will not happen. Either almost everyone is unhappy and Orwellian control must be established to prevent disorder. Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
I'm pretty sure Hitler tried that once...didn't work out well. What's so hard about accepting someone different? Oh, right--statism. Carry on.
banks are historically run by jews but not because they want to take over the world. The reason jews run the banks is because usury was outlawed by the catholic church but not in judaism. Since these were basically the only 2 religions in europe at the time and almost everyone fell into one of these two religions it meant that the jews had a monopoly on banking. This then gave the jews an extraordinary competitive advantage which lead to power disproportionate to their numbers and the impression, to outsiders, that they were attempting to take over the world.
Banks historically are run by jews. Why? Because they want to take over world and having control over money supply makes things easier for them. Read the protocols of learned elders of zion.
The Jews lent money because the Christians and the Muslims banned their own kind from dealing in Usury or the charging of interest on loans.
But why let the facts get in the way of a good hate speech?
It is stupid belief that people with totally different beliefs what is right and wrong and with various and incompatible needs can coexist in same society with everyone being happy. This will not happen. Either almost everyone is unhappy and Orwellian control must be established to prevent disorder. Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
I'm pretty sure Hitler tried that once...didn't work out well. What's so hard about accepting someone different? Oh, right--statism. Carry on.
It is stupid belief that people with totally different beliefs what is right and wrong and with various and incompatible needs can coexist in same society with everyone being happy. This will not happen. Either almost everyone is unhappy and Orwellian control must be established to prevent disorder. Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
I'm pretty sure Hitler tried that once...didn't work out well. What's so hard about accepting someone different? Oh, right--statism. Carry on.
It is stupid belief that people with totally different beliefs what is right and wrong and with various and incompatible needs can coexist in same society with everyone being happy. This will not happen. Either almost everyone is unhappy and Orwellian control must be established to prevent disorder. Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
I'm pretty sure Hitler tried that once...didn't work out well. What's so hard about accepting someone different? Oh, right--statism. Carry on.
It is stupid belief that people with totally different beliefs what is right and wrong and with various and incompatible needs can coexist in same society with everyone being happy. This will not happen. Either almost everyone is unhappy and Orwellian control must be established to prevent disorder. Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
I'm pretty sure Hitler tried that once...didn't work out well. What's so hard about accepting someone different? Oh, right--statism. Carry on.
Too bad Hitler lost the Sid Meier's Civilization III game because of bad placement on the map. Military defeat shows nothing about is his politics right or wrong. If Hitler won WW2 You will say something different, right?
My ancestors worked and fought hard for this land. Many of them died in wars, suffered in Gulag for their beliefs. Giving this land to people who have no idea about how dear it is to the people, having different ideals and simply looking to exploit this land - sorry they are not welcome here and never will be!
edit: Inspirational video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fa8vj2Q0TI
I know that the war is not over until last shot is fired and my land is made free from parasites. Every generation participated in war. I understand I will also need to take weapon some day in my hands. And I will have greater responsibility because most of the youth is becoming fat and from war they understand only as much as Call of Duty games learn them.
I had noticed the Anti Semitism on this site too, but, to be honest, I like it. Its what free speech looks like.
I don't agree with what they say, however, I am not hypocritical enough to forget what my own country has done to jews over the years.
About the only country which hasn't expelled jews from their land is possibly the USA!
Here is a good list of countries who have thrown them out http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/expelled.htm
The problem is that religion is a very strong influencer on peoples beliefs, and with money being an industry that was considered too dirty to be a respectable living, jews ended up doing it - and people hate bankers!
Ironically, western Europe has now developed an intolerance of intolerance so freedom of speech on issues like this are getting rare - so please leave it alone, a good old fashioned racist and anti Semitism rant is worth the entertainment value in its own right - just don't take it seriously!
That is how you defeat it!
I don't agree with what they say, however, I am not hypocritical enough to forget what my own country has done to jews over the years.
About the only country which hasn't expelled jews from their land is possibly the USA!
Here is a good list of countries who have thrown them out http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/expelled.htm
The problem is that religion is a very strong influencer on peoples beliefs, and with money being an industry that was considered too dirty to be a respectable living, jews ended up doing it - and people hate bankers!
Ironically, western Europe has now developed an intolerance of intolerance so freedom of speech on issues like this are getting rare - so please leave it alone, a good old fashioned racist and anti Semitism rant is worth the entertainment value in its own right - just don't take it seriously!
That is how you defeat it!
Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
Hmm... I'm leaning back toward the idea that MM is actually a satire, and (behind the fake persona) thinks of theymos as cyber-Hitler. It is stupid belief that people with totally different beliefs what is right and wrong and with various and incompatible needs can coexist in same society with everyone being happy. This will not happen. Either almost everyone is unhappy and Orwellian control must be established to prevent disorder. Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
You know we keep you around as a joke, right?I don't think he does, and that's what makes it so funny!
Crap I might have ruined it...
It is stupid belief that people with totally different beliefs what is right and wrong and with various and incompatible needs can coexist in same society with everyone being happy. This will not happen. Either almost everyone is unhappy and Orwellian control must be established to prevent disorder. Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
I'm pretty sure Hitler tried that once...didn't work out well. What's so hard about accepting someone different? Oh, right--statism. Carry on.
It is stupid belief that people with totally different beliefs what is right and wrong and with various and incompatible needs can coexist in same society with everyone being happy. This will not happen. Either almost everyone is unhappy and Orwellian control must be established to prevent disorder. Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
You know we keep you around as a joke, right?
It is stupid belief that people with totally different beliefs what is right and wrong and with various and incompatible needs can coexist in same society with everyone being happy. This will not happen. Either almost everyone is unhappy and Orwellian control must be established to prevent disorder. Or the society must be purged from minorities of all sorts (immigrants, perverts, people with wrong political beliefs) and mononationalistic socialist republic must be established.
I like having racists, antisemites, and general bigots around. If they are just silenced, then they are still around, being part of our society in secret. If they are vocal, it's easier to tell whom to ignore and especially avoid. And it doesn't even matter if they are being trolls, or being very polite about it. Stupid beliefs are stupid, and should be laughed at out of existence.
Antibanker have proper political views but his behavior was inpolite and somewhat trollish. No matter what he said such behavior could be considered spam in most forums. Antisemites and third way nationalsocialists must be polite and must spend extra time explaining their ideas for the population. Antibanker with his posts mostly consisting of two sentences composed of two words in each makes all nationalsocialism supporters look like neanderthals.
Jump to: