Topic: WHY LAUDA'S PLAGIARISM CASE HAVE SO MUCH DRAMA? (Read 1155 times)

So what? I have acknowledged and made it public, I am here with the fact that I am myself, not a real account hiding person to mess with a fake account like you.

And whose puppets are you? With your saying here, I guess you will eliminate 120 people who are trusting Lauda in their trust setting, right? I am not talking about where Lauda is wrong or not, I don't care about it. I want to see how this movies will play out 

Perhaps to better understand your side of this argument you could tell me what it is that Lauda has done to you personally?

Because for sure you are not just going to rock up here and start a witch hunt on some random member.

You are coming across as bully and I don't like bullies, I am sure there is a rule some where for that as well, you are trying to bully and dictate staff policy, I suspect there is a rule for that as well, perhaps we should all start shouting for your head to be chopped.

You have made your point, you don't like Lauda and want a perm ban.... we all get that.... now let the powers that be deal with it and you run along like a nice little girl.

Thanks and have a good night Babe xxx

TT

Another purchased account? Too easy



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/chuckbuck-is-talking-to-himself-abusing-merit-a-farm-house-of-alt-5247232

I get bored of asking but can you provide the " trolling" aka the incorrect information I am promugating as true?

Watch nothing get produced.


Lauda is pure scamming scum, you are his assmunching puppet
Another one needs culling.

No trying to spin such a devious scamming extorting trust abusing dirt bag that has been banned several times before is net positive

Got it  
(See this image from another person  )

It has been too many topics to talk about Lauda lately, especially a guy with a trolling account, who attacked most users on the forum. Perhaps you hate Lauda for what he/she did on this forum? And those who have received negative feedback for any reason   Sometimes we should look at a person through the way they respond to a problem. And I want to see what Lauda will do with this mess  

---

In addition, also emphasize that Lauda is one of the most recognized users (BPIP displayed) but Lauda is not DT (DT1 or DT2), don't be confused.

Oh lol

The problem is DT is infested with his puppets and alts all changing their minds now lol


Everyone should read this thread.

Whilst everyone was baying for blood and taking the piss out of legends being banned for copying their projects Twitter announcements to their own threads.

Making plagiarism excuses bingo

One member said just ban if you have to but dont take the piss out of legends getting banned

Nullius gave him a red tag for even showing empathy because plagiarism was so evil.
Lauda gave the post 10 merits Lololololo

Read this entire thread everyone.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/plagiarism-apologist-92110-cryptohunter-rationalized-dishonesty-in-principle-5214166

Nullius now making excuses for.lauda

The entire DT is rotten. So long as they get their btc dust from.chipmixer et al these greedy vermin will support scamming.

They all need removing or the double standards just keep crushing free speech and allowing DT to scam with impunity.


I totally agree with cobra also

Lauda needs to be permanently banned just to improve the community. Never seen a more horrible person on a forum before.

Ah the dirty old perv is here. Now anyone bringing up his cyber sex bunny laudas sneaky and deliberate plagiarism is a troll?
What happened to plagiarism being the most horrific crime that even a starving homeless old perv would not consider if it would save their lives?

How does one say scammer supporting double standards pervy old sex pest in latin?
Lol at this imbecile nullius.

What does neeechy have to say about double standards pathetic weasels I wonder.

It takes a few days for the mods to ban a user for plagiarism. In my case, when I reported someone (ansi), it took nearly 2 weeks. Why this much drama? Because most who got fucked by her want her to burn immediately and some of those who want to please her want her to be free, that's all. IMO, a temp ban + a Sig Ban seems to be the most sensible approach. So just give some time for the Mods to deal with it and then we can have a whole new drama.

Subject: WHY LAUDA'S PLAGIARISM CASE HAVE SO MUCH DRAMA?

Obvious answer:  Because trolls such as yourself are making as much drama as you can.  Vide the redundantly and repetitiously duplicative creation of this thread.

P.S., you forgot tags.

---

Interesting.

---

It is a comforting thought that, at the current rate of drama, Lauda’s severely infelicitous posts in 2014–2015 will now take us to the moon.  New ATH this weekend?

non sequitur ?

These non words are great

Stop copying me everyone.

Back on topic everyone  dont let them derail from their scamming extorting friends deliberate and sneaky plagiarism.
We are discussing what happens to scamming extorting trust abusing shady escrowing non accidental plagiarists
Suchmoon busted lauda so clearly wants him gone anyway.
Nobody else would do all of that.
What did lauda do suchmoon ?

Fortunejack is a honey pot of scamming scum now that I look

They have the 3 top scammers on DT

Lauda
Tman
Nutildah

Who will they replace laudas sig with?

Who has scammed enough to be eligible?

What about one of your alts suchmoon? You need the money now it seems ?

Is cryptohunter a troll?

I am Spartacus

I am also a non conformist
When discussing scammers then I'm afraid non scammers may get a mention ?
Non scammer is a term for someone that has not scammed.
What possible other prefix would you use there?
Please do not make such silly claims based on such flimsy conspiratorial poop.
What is the obsession with every member being cryptohunter?
Were that the case it makes absolutely no difference.
The points that I am making are those which you need to address .
 A non scammer is clearly a member who's history is scam free. I have seen this description used by others here.
That is not the case with the member lauda. It is not the case for you either.
If you believe such claims invalidate the statements I have made, you need to pay closer attention
I expected more from a non account seller.
I hope lauda is perm banned due to being an undeniable proven scammer, but will accept deliberate and sneaky plagiarism as a reason. I'm shocked a forum would permit scammers to continue attempting to scam other members once they have been identified.
Whatever the outcome it will remain as an observable event.
This will be the benchmark for plagiarism cases.
Previously banned several times, documented scamming, demoted from mod for extortion,documented racism, and now deliberate and sneaky patchwork plagiarism

Let's observe. 

Oh, ffs lauda...
"It happened long time ago"

Makes me wonder, where are some forum members...
He will probably get signature ban, but in case nothing happens there will probably be more theories and more topics. Never ending bitcointalk drama.

"Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!"

I added the quotation marks, to make sure it's clear I'm quoting - wouldn't like to be accused of plagiarism.

by rules Lauda must be banned and it must be permaban only
in my opinion I would not want her to be banned
but i would like sig permaban and its would be fair

Lauda has always sucked as a poster 

New cryptohunter alt detected.





Set phasers to Ignore.

Bitcoin thrives on drama. If the forum doesn’t have enough drama, the price won’t go up as much.

We have largely stopped permabanbing users for plagiarism, so I would guess Lauda won’t get a permaban. He probably will get some kind of punishment based on how others have been handled for similar situations.

You are spreading lies now. The plagiarism in this case is clearly a patchwork attempt which is clearly an obfuscation attempt and not a simple forgetting to place a reference.
The lie here is that the scam evidence against lauda is not rock solid. I have looked through it and gone back to the orignal 2014 threads. There is no doubt this member lauda was attempting to scam investors. Please do not dispute this without presenting your clear case.  The" you are wrong" doesn't cut it. Again it makes you look very untrustworthy. I am surprised the forum permits members to tell lies and receive payment.
You can not permit scammers that have been subsequently been banned several times,  to be given weaker punishment than those that have not been so net negative and dangerous.
The extortion attempt was real. They simply forced the victim to say it was not when they got caught
Theymos removed lauda from mod over this so stop lying.
It looks like you need to be watched extremely closely.
If you are going to accurately assess a members net value then you can not allow liars like steamtyme to pollute this process.
Scamming should be impossible to earn your way back from. The financially dangerous must be removed.
Lauda was just here claiming that a 2yr sig ban was not sufficient punishment and a perm ban was the way to go.
Let lauda have his way.

You must not listen to peoples friends who have themselves had zero pity for plagiarists. Thepharmacist is the first to jump on plagiarists previously and demand perm bans for less serious plagiarism. His friend lauda is a confirmed scammer who was removed from being a mod due to trying to extort members.

I'm spreading no lies. Feel free to point out if  I have my non perma ban punishment information confused.

You're problem is that you forget the forum does not moderate scams.  That is for the police to sort out. It is again just your opinion that they are a scammer which you are wrongly applying to this instance.

The "extortion" case was something people have delved into on numerous occasionsand is something from before my time.  This again goes down to disagreeing with them and their actions. Disagreeing with how someone conducts themselves within the rules of the forum again has no business being taken into consideration here.

Yes they have been banned before but that still doesn't mean they have not been an overall net positive for the forum at large. Consider the numerous pinned topics that have for years provided good solid information for newbies.

You are laser focused and only concerned with your opinion and distaste for Lauda. If toy really wanted a consistent punishment applied then you would be open to the possibility of a temp ban then a sig ban.