Topic: WHY LAUDA'S PLAGIARISM CASE HAVE SO MUCH DRAMA? (Read 1153 times)

So what? I have acknowledged and made it public, I am here with the fact that I am myself, not a real account hiding person to mess with a fake account like you.

And whose puppets are you? With your saying here, I guess you will eliminate 120 people who are trusting Lauda in their trust setting, right? I am not talking about where Lauda is wrong or not, I don't care about it. I want to see how this movies will play out 

Perhaps to better understand your side of this argument you could tell me what it is that Lauda has done to you personally?

Because for sure you are not just going to rock up here and start a witch hunt on some random member.

You are coming across as bully and I don't like bullies, I am sure there is a rule some where for that as well, you are trying to bully and dictate staff policy, I suspect there is a rule for that as well, perhaps we should all start shouting for your head to be chopped.

You have made your point, you don't like Lauda and want a perm ban.... we all get that.... now let the powers that be deal with it and you run along like a nice little girl.

Thanks and have a good night Babe xxx

TT

Another purchased account? Too easy



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/chuckbuck-is-talking-to-himself-abusing-merit-a-farm-house-of-alt-5247232

I get bored of asking but can you provide the " trolling" aka the incorrect information I am promugating as true?

Watch nothing get produced.


Lauda is pure scamming scum, you are his assmunching puppet
Another one needs culling.

No trying to spin such a devious scamming extorting trust abusing dirt bag that has been banned several times before is net positive

Got it  
(See this image from another person  )

It has been too many topics to talk about Lauda lately, especially a guy with a trolling account, who attacked most users on the forum. Perhaps you hate Lauda for what he/she did on this forum? And those who have received negative feedback for any reason   Sometimes we should look at a person through the way they respond to a problem. And I want to see what Lauda will do with this mess  

---

In addition, also emphasize that Lauda is one of the most recognized users (BPIP displayed) but Lauda is not DT (DT1 or DT2), don't be confused.

Oh lol

The problem is DT is infested with his puppets and alts all changing their minds now lol


Everyone should read this thread.

Whilst everyone was baying for blood and taking the piss out of legends being banned for copying their projects Twitter announcements to their own threads.

Making plagiarism excuses bingo

One member said just ban if you have to but dont take the piss out of legends getting banned

Nullius gave him a red tag for even showing empathy because plagiarism was so evil.
Lauda gave the post 10 merits Lololololo

Read this entire thread everyone.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/plagiarism-apologist-92110-cryptohunter-rationalized-dishonesty-in-principle-5214166

Nullius now making excuses for.lauda

The entire DT is rotten. So long as they get their btc dust from.chipmixer et al these greedy vermin will support scamming.

They all need removing or the double standards just keep crushing free speech and allowing DT to scam with impunity.


I totally agree with cobra also

Lauda needs to be permanently banned just to improve the community. Never seen a more horrible person on a forum before.

Ah the dirty old perv is here. Now anyone bringing up his cyber sex bunny laudas sneaky and deliberate plagiarism is a troll?
What happened to plagiarism being the most horrific crime that even a starving homeless old perv would not consider if it would save their lives?

How does one say scammer supporting double standards pervy old sex pest in latin?
Lol at this imbecile nullius.

What does neeechy have to say about double standards pathetic weasels I wonder.

It takes a few days for the mods to ban a user for plagiarism. In my case, when I reported someone (ansi), it took nearly 2 weeks. Why this much drama? Because most who got fucked by her want her to burn immediately and some of those who want to please her want her to be free, that's all. IMO, a temp ban + a Sig Ban seems to be the most sensible approach. So just give some time for the Mods to deal with it and then we can have a whole new drama.

Subject: WHY LAUDA'S PLAGIARISM CASE HAVE SO MUCH DRAMA?

Obvious answer:  Because trolls such as yourself are making as much drama as you can.  Vide the redundantly and repetitiously duplicative creation of this thread.

P.S., you forgot tags.

---

Interesting.

---

It is a comforting thought that, at the current rate of drama, Lauda’s severely infelicitous posts in 2014–2015 will now take us to the moon.  New ATH this weekend?

non sequitur ?

These non words are great

Stop copying me everyone.

Back on topic everyone  dont let them derail from their scamming extorting friends deliberate and sneaky plagiarism.
We are discussing what happens to scamming extorting trust abusing shady escrowing non accidental plagiarists
Suchmoon busted lauda so clearly wants him gone anyway.
Nobody else would do all of that.
What did lauda do suchmoon ?

Fortunejack is a honey pot of scamming scum now that I look

They have the 3 top scammers on DT

Lauda
Tman
Nutildah

Who will they replace laudas sig with?

Who has scammed enough to be eligible?

What about one of your alts suchmoon? You need the money now it seems ?

Is cryptohunter a troll?

I am Spartacus

I am also a non conformist
When discussing scammers then I'm afraid non scammers may get a mention ?
Non scammer is a term for someone that has not scammed.
What possible other prefix would you use there?
Please do not make such silly claims based on such flimsy conspiratorial poop.
What is the obsession with every member being cryptohunter?
Were that the case it makes absolutely no difference.
The points that I am making are those which you need to address .
 A non scammer is clearly a member who's history is scam free. I have seen this description used by others here.
That is not the case with the member lauda. It is not the case for you either.
If you believe such claims invalidate the statements I have made, you need to pay closer attention
I expected more from a non account seller.
I hope lauda is perm banned due to being an undeniable proven scammer, but will accept deliberate and sneaky plagiarism as a reason. I'm shocked a forum would permit scammers to continue attempting to scam other members once they have been identified.
Whatever the outcome it will remain as an observable event.
This will be the benchmark for plagiarism cases.
Previously banned several times, documented scamming, demoted from mod for extortion,documented racism, and now deliberate and sneaky patchwork plagiarism

Let's observe. 

Oh, ffs lauda...
"It happened long time ago"

Makes me wonder, where are some forum members...
He will probably get signature ban, but in case nothing happens there will probably be more theories and more topics. Never ending bitcointalk drama.

"Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!"

I added the quotation marks, to make sure it's clear I'm quoting - wouldn't like to be accused of plagiarism.

by rules Lauda must be banned and it must be permaban only
in my opinion I would not want her to be banned
but i would like sig permaban and its would be fair

Lauda has always sucked as a poster 

New cryptohunter alt detected.





Set phasers to Ignore.

Bitcoin thrives on drama. If the forum doesn’t have enough drama, the price won’t go up as much.

We have largely stopped permabanbing users for plagiarism, so I would guess Lauda won’t get a permaban. He probably will get some kind of punishment based on how others have been handled for similar situations.

You are spreading lies now. The plagiarism in this case is clearly a patchwork attempt which is clearly an obfuscation attempt and not a simple forgetting to place a reference.
The lie here is that the scam evidence against lauda is not rock solid. I have looked through it and gone back to the orignal 2014 threads. There is no doubt this member lauda was attempting to scam investors. Please do not dispute this without presenting your clear case.  The" you are wrong" doesn't cut it. Again it makes you look very untrustworthy. I am surprised the forum permits members to tell lies and receive payment.
You can not permit scammers that have been subsequently been banned several times,  to be given weaker punishment than those that have not been so net negative and dangerous.
The extortion attempt was real. They simply forced the victim to say it was not when they got caught
Theymos removed lauda from mod over this so stop lying.
It looks like you need to be watched extremely closely.
If you are going to accurately assess a members net value then you can not allow liars like steamtyme to pollute this process.
Scamming should be impossible to earn your way back from. The financially dangerous must be removed.
Lauda was just here claiming that a 2yr sig ban was not sufficient punishment and a perm ban was the way to go.
Let lauda have his way.

You must not listen to peoples friends who have themselves had zero pity for plagiarists. Thepharmacist is the first to jump on plagiarists previously and demand perm bans for less serious plagiarism. His friend lauda is a confirmed scammer who was removed from being a mod due to trying to extort members.

I'm spreading no lies. Feel free to point out if  I have my non perma ban punishment information confused.

You're problem is that you forget the forum does not moderate scams.  That is for the police to sort out. It is again just your opinion that they are a scammer which you are wrongly applying to this instance.

The "extortion" case was something people have delved into on numerous occasionsand is something from before my time.  This again goes down to disagreeing with them and their actions. Disagreeing with how someone conducts themselves within the rules of the forum again has no business being taken into consideration here.

Yes they have been banned before but that still doesn't mean they have not been an overall net positive for the forum at large. Consider the numerous pinned topics that have for years provided good solid information for newbies.

You are laser focused and only concerned with your opinion and distaste for Lauda. If toy really wanted a consistent punishment applied then you would be open to the possibility of a temp ban then a sig ban.

You are discussing this in terms of a " normal-" member that has not been previously banned. Also this member lauda has been found guilty of scamming. I have reviewed the evidence and it is air tight.

Scammers should be banned.
Plagiarist scammers ... well you do the math.

Lauda has himself advocated for plagiarist to be banned. Let him live by his own standards.

Yeah one or two of the examples do not look to good for Lauda.

I would imagine a 6 month to 2 year signature ban and maybe a 30 to 90 day real ban.

I don't believe in permaban

I do think signature bans are good.

I would prefer to see lauda post and have a  signature ban.  With the following statement my signature has been banned until (Jan 1 2021)  or what ever date.

I actually prefer signature ban for most offenders.

It allows you to follow the person and new posts they make.

Instead of them retreating to an alt account no one knowns anything about.

Stop spreading lies.
I have reviewed the evidence that proves lauda is a scammer.
He has had multiple bans already.
There is strong evidence he tried to extort a member by threatening their family.
A 2yr sig ban is for "normal" non scamming not previously banned members

Why would lauda get less. Dont be stupid.

You appear to be trying to suggest a far lower than appropriate punishment. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Claiming a person with this kind of history is a positive and constructive member makes you look untrustworthy.
Perm ban now after all of his previous attempts to scam other members or every member banned should be reinstated.
Plagiarism is the smaller part of Laura's negative influence here. Make it the final.

Must say I was surprised to see a thread like this. Will there be a ban? Yes, if the threshold for plagiarism is passed. The forum is consistent in punishment. Will it be permanent? No.
I believe that regardless of how you feel about Lauda and their judgement they have been a net positive to the forum. It's not a good look but they will still be welcomed as a member if the forum.
Unless I've missed something that is still the criteria.  So likely a sig ban for a year and 30 day temp ban.

Lauda should be banned.
The other thread demonstrated some very crafty patchwork style plagiarism.
The excuse given of a word for word memorized mistake is quite ridiculous.
Lauda also has a scammer thread open describing in detail how he was deliberately telling lies to entice investors under a false premise. It is in the reputation section.
There is also a serious extortion thread and serious risky escrow I am reading through now.
It is remarkable they are still a member. Theymos removed lauda from admin and lauda has been banned several times already.

OP's English isn't that bad.  He's basically writing what I figured members would start doing once this thing was uncovered, though I suspect there are some alt accounts involved here just trying to accelerate the drama. 

Yeah, that's definitely part of it.  It's one thing to remove a member like Lauda from DT, but it's another thing entirely to ban one like him/her.  I don't know what, if anything, is going on behind the scenes (and by that I mean in Theymos's head), but popcorn is about to become harder to get than hand sanitizer.

I don't know what you are talking about, I seem to have to find something to translate what you write.
I hope I'm not mistaken in interpreting the objectives of the OP.

Are you showing that @Lauda is copying/pasting, you are wrong about it, @Lauda does the explaining about the SHA256 computer, and shows all the original text and posts edited previously, he tries to explain what is wrong with the topic.

How can you say @Lauda made a mistake, you should correct your language to say something that is true for others. troll.
No one cares about all that, @Lauda is very clear in straightening out what was wrong in the post, the OP was wrong in drawing conclusions, not careful or not reading it.

I dislike people judging others for such things seriously, in addition to neglecting what the thread is talking about and going very far off topic.
Most people in BitcoinTalk aren't native English speakers so refrain from commenting nonsense. The important point is to write your idea in the clearest possible manner and others can react if they wish.

Back to the topic now, i prefer to keep my neutrality in bitcointalk drama. Lauda is well known person and admins/staff will take more time analysing evidences, although whatever the decision will be, it will bring much more drama.

Why do some users make alt accounts just to post the same? You've just cited your opinion yet you've quoted all the evidences. This thread should be removed as it is just like the recent post

"HOLY FUCK !!!! THE SCAMMER IS ALSO A PLAGIARIST OF GIANT MAGNITUDE - SIG BAN NO"

You could've instead posted your opinion on that thread or make a reply at the main Report Plagiarism thread than making your own.

If you wanted others to be banned, you are free to open up your sides and opinions. Yet if you would make accounts just to post the same issues, you might lose the argument in the end, making your accusations subjective. I don't side with Lauda nor with anyone at all. Yes, he must be punished the same as the other users. Yet with those desperate actions, again, you might lose the war.

Meanwhile, you've been active just to post that, and used the same comments here. We all know that there is a forum rule that states that it is prohibited to duplicate posts.

Lauda deserves disciplinary actions. Yet you also deserve the same. Remember not to do the same mistakes as what you accuse to others.

lauda plagiarism? BAN

no sorry: PERMABAN

as others are banned, he too must be banned

because Lauda is a well-known member and has contributed to this forum. Lauda also has a lot of enemies which where most of the drama comes from(maybe not). in the end, moderators will have to make a decision whether to permaban him or temporary ban(moderator might consider his contribution and lessen the punishment but I am not certain).

Moderator's and staff are quickly banning members who plagiarize, and why does Lauda can explain about the issue? Why it's taking too much drama?
He should be perma ban! quickly as that. If that is a normal member, right now he is ban. But if it's lauda he can explain?

The forum rules are simple, you plagiarize you are gonna get perma ban.