Topic: Why MicroStrategy can buy BTC but not other institutions? - page 2. (Read 371 times)

MicroStrategy is not the only institution that buys Bitcoin, but the former CEO Michael Saylor was a big-time Bitcoin evangelist before he resigned his position on August/28/2022 and thus helped the company make many headlines on their purchase of BTC. We have  the Cathie Wood the CEO of Ark Invest, I think is also in the game with the company. However, MicroStrategy is ahead of them on the institutional side because the company has a good knowledge/understanding of Bitcoin and how it works and has been seriously investing regardless of ETF approval.

Because they think Bitcoin is still in grey area, if the Bitcoin ETF approved, it will make them think Bitcoin is safe since it's more regulated.

Although Bitcoin was created to fight against centralization, we can't stop the centralization which want to control Bitcoin since we can't control them. It's up for them to create Bitcoin ETF, Bitcoin stock, and other fake Bitcoin. People who want to invest in Bitcoin must need to avoid that kind centralization.

They have different tastes for their investments like I can not have same taste like yours.

Bitcoin Treasuries. Many institutional investors in the list and they spent different capital at different times to buy bitcoin. Micro Strategy is mentioned most commonly on media because they are a biggest institutional investor.

Micro Strategy accept bigger risk and they went ahead of many institutional investors. They don't wait for Bitcoin Spot ETFs to invest in Bitcoin. But late comers are making their mistakes because Micro Strategy actually buy bitcoin. Those guys wait for Bitcoin Spot ETFs to invest will have more risk, they can lose their capital with Bitcoin Spot ETFs.

Micro Strategy's Investment history

MicroStrategy is heavily invested in the Bitcoin network, not just in bitcoins. Even though I have like months to watch what's happening with MicroStrategy and the like, I remember very well Sailor being obsessed with bitcoin and lightning.

I believe the answer to your question is that most institutional investors prefer the convenience and regulatory oversight an ETF can provide.

Many members had already answered the query but here is what I have to say, I didn't actually aware of the basic functionality of ETF but due to the current trend, I have to learn it. So, I learned that they are not good for the value and purpose of BTC. I know the answer is not related to your query but give it a second.

As there are two types of people who like and dislike ETF, (an example can get from Z390's reply as some of his friends do like it but he doesn't). Those who are traditional and do not like the ideas of new technologies like blockchain and decentralization will always prefer to buy BTC from middlemen who can assure them full security. But there are others who do not need middlemen because they knew that's what decentralization means.

Coming to answer, Microstrategy knew the hype in the market so they didn't wait for ETF because they knew people will buy shares from their company. It's like you have a company and are invested in BTC and people who like to buy shares from your company, are meant to be buying shares in BTC but indirectly. Like if BTC goes up, your company will make a profit so does the shareholders too. And other companies are targeting the traditional people because modern people had already made their choice of MS, so new institutes can also buy BTC and do the same as MS but their target audience is traditonal people. That's why these ETFs thing made so much hype into the market.

Mk4 nailed it, probably a bitcoin etf may be more helpful to some of the institutions who are having some difficulty to understand bitcoin on different aspect. The recent news, about Gensler commented that bitcoin etf is not needed. Well they may have a lot of wrong idea about it and dont understand the situations.

Bitcoin ETF is not the same as bitcoin, so your point of view is closer to me. The more centralized corporations issue ersatz bitcoins, the less people will understand what real bitcoin is. And the real bitcoin is only on the bitcoin blockchain, only the one to which you have complete and undivided control of the keys.

The further we go, the more centralized corporations are releasing their versions of bitcoin, but all these numbers on the screens in the personal accounts of these corporations are fiat promises of bitcoins, not bitcoins themselves. And the difference is huge.

Mk4 dropped tha BOMB, thats all you need to know about the ETF honestly, I also want you to understand that with or without the ETF, Bitcoin will still do so well, I am one of the few people who want to see the ETF gone though, because I want to prove that BTc will do well even without the ETF approval, some friends of mine think otherwise.

They forget that it's been a long time where ETF approval has been rejected, not one and not twice either, we are used to this news already that's why I don't feel bullish when the ETF possible approval news was released.

Institutional investors can buy bitcoin today. A bitcoin spot ETF is so people and institutions can buy bitcoin without the need to use a cryptocurrency broker(like Coinbase) and worry on how to store their funds securely themselves. Then can pretty much just use their typical stock broker like Fidelity, etc and buy bitcoin as if it was a stock.

If I understood it correctly spot BTC ETF will allow institutional investors to but BTC, and hence a lot of people waiting spot BTC ETF to be approved. But then how come MicroStrategy is already heavily invested in BTC? Why they can buy it, while other institutional investors waiting for ETF?