Why no one has the balls to make a new SHA256 ?
ASIC miners 
Topic: Why no one has the balls to make a new SHA256 ? (Read 1764 times)
Just use Bitcoin Testnet. Save yourself the trouble.
You could keep your testnet valuation spam in threads that are at least a tiny bit related to testnet 
Just use Bitcoin Testnet. Save yourself the trouble.
Why no one has the balls to make a new SHA256 ?
Do it yourself, signature whore 
I thought there had already been a few new SHA256-based coins. Terracoin? Bytecoin?
But there are so many existing SHA256-based coins you can mine without diverting your hashing away from bitcoin that they seem kind of pointless.
if you aren't even collecting all the "free" namecoins, devcoins, groupcoins, ixcoins, i0coins, coiledcoins and geistgeld you can get by merged mining why even think about lowering your rate of aquisition of all of those, including bitcoin/ Its not as if some of those are not themselves already considered obscure, nor as if none of those have fast block rates. So there is nothing to gain by making yet another ixcoin clone or i0coin clone or coiledcoin clone or geistgeld (fast blocks) clone or whatever, especially if you are even going to be qable to merged-mine it.
Some of those merged coins are still ridiculously low difficulty too, so small miners can mine them much better than they can mine some new instamining crap that gets jumped on instantly by lots of hash power. Small miners have been mining some of these coins for years without any hassles from big mining farms.
-MarkM-
But there are so many existing SHA256-based coins you can mine without diverting your hashing away from bitcoin that they seem kind of pointless.
if you aren't even collecting all the "free" namecoins, devcoins, groupcoins, ixcoins, i0coins, coiledcoins and geistgeld you can get by merged mining why even think about lowering your rate of aquisition of all of those, including bitcoin/ Its not as if some of those are not themselves already considered obscure, nor as if none of those have fast block rates. So there is nothing to gain by making yet another ixcoin clone or i0coin clone or coiledcoin clone or geistgeld (fast blocks) clone or whatever, especially if you are even going to be qable to merged-mine it.
Some of those merged coins are still ridiculously low difficulty too, so small miners can mine them much better than they can mine some new instamining crap that gets jumped on instantly by lots of hash power. Small miners have been mining some of these coins for years without any hassles from big mining farms.
-MarkM-
Because itll just get asic bombed. How the fuck is that lacking balls? Thats called foresight.
+1
Holy shit, wow , just wow , you know what , I get up every day , and the world never fails to surprise me.
Because itll just get asic bombed. How the fuck is that lacking balls? Thats called foresight.
Bro can you just help me understand why someone who paid so much and waited so long for a asic miner
would turn to a new SHA coin when they have more of a chance of getting close to ROI, hashing BTC?
And the logic in pointing their asics to a new coin knowing it would destroy it and most probably leaving them with useless coins anyway?
Because HAZARD im sure im missing something that your not, can you help me out here by explaining this logic cause its not the first time ive seen you say it
Thanks in advance
Using SHA256 puts the all power in the hands of the technologically elite and privileged few. Why do it?
Ok thanks, then i guess someone would have balls to release one, but in doing so would actually be interesting and might just stand as a reminder to anyone thinking of trying in the future
and i know foresight forces us to be rational and not even attempt it but hey, why not encourage it and see what happens.
Hell why dont you release one just for the lulz
it would certainly be a great way to make an example of it and you are great at launching coins and i mean that genuinely and of course i think it would be fun
Because itll just get asic bombed. How the fuck is that lacking balls? Thats called foresight.
Bro can you just help me understand why someone who paid so much and waited so long for a asic miner
would turn to a new SHA coin when they have more of a chance of getting close to ROI, hashing BTC?
And the logic in pointing their asics to a new coin knowing it would destroy it and most probably leaving them with useless coins anyway?
Because HAZARD im sure im missing something that your not, can you help me out here by explaining this logic cause its not the first time ive seen you say it
Thanks in advance
Using SHA256 puts the all power in the hands of the technologically elite and privileged few. Why do it?
I have been researching on merge mining more and more, I believe coins could be beneficial if they could be merge mined with bitcoin.
Because itll just get asic bombed. How the fuck is that lacking balls? Thats called foresight.
Bro can you just help me understand why someone who paid so much and waited so long for a asic miner
would turn to a new SHA coin when they have more of a chance of getting close to ROI, hashing BTC?
And the logic in pointing their asics to a new coin knowing it would destroy it and most probably leaving them with useless coins anyway?
Because HAZARD im sure im missing something that your not, can you help me out here by explaining this logic cause its not the first time ive seen you say it
Thanks in advance
No way, unless the you have asic miners ready to protect your new coin.
Scrypt is technologically superior to SHA-256 as far as cryptos go. There's no reason to use SHA-256 anymore.
The first statement may be true. The second is not.
If you really have balls, make a MD4 coin. 
it's because hazard can't compile it yet
Why no one has the balls to make a new SHA256 ?
I'm wondering why no one has the balls to make a new SHA4096!
Scrypt is technologically superior to SHA-256 as far as cryptos go. There's no reason to use SHA-256 anymore.
u really think thats true ? if it was BFL .. AVALON .. and many other upcoming companies, u think they would invest so much money if sha256 wasnt good no more ?
I'm sure that went over your head though, you appear to be mentally challenged.
ROFL .. u sure proved your IQ ... welcome to my ignore list
Scrypt is technologically superior to SHA-256 as far as cryptos go. There's no reason to use SHA-256 anymore.
u really think thats true ? if it was BFL .. AVALON .. and many other upcoming companies, u think they would invest so much money if sha256 wasnt good no more ?
I'm sure that went over your head though, you appear to be mentally challenged.
ROFL .. u sure proved your IQ ... welcome to my ignore list
Scrypt is technologically superior to SHA-256 as far as cryptos go. There's no reason to use SHA-256 anymore.
u really think thats true ? if it was BFL .. AVALON .. and many other upcoming companies, u think they would invest so much money if sha256 wasnt good no more ?
I'm sure that went over your head though, you appear to be mentally challenged.
Scrypt is technologically superior to SHA-256 as far as cryptos go. There's no reason to use SHA-256 anymore.
u really think thats true ? if it was BFL .. AVALON .. and many other upcoming companies, u think they would invest so much money if sha256 wasnt good no more ?
Jump to: