Beautiful? whether in investing you have to look at it from this point of view? perhaps more precisely how he contributed to each project. quantity, quantity and trace of success are far more relevant as a reference in investing.
Yes, but for the main reference that is commonly seen by everyone are only three things, firstly the composition of the team is falid, because it would be useless if a project does not have a completely falid team composition,
the two project partners work with any company, because if the project does not have strong relationships, it will also be difficult to succeed, especially now that there are many rivals, and the third is the conceptual direction they play in running the project along with the number of products they will issue for public use.