Pages:
Author

Topic: Why switching to mBTC won't increase Bitcoin price. (Read 3538 times)

legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060

Why would it push the price up? Simple. Each mbtc would be sold for $1 and that would push the final btc price much higher.

The only way 1 mBTC would sell for $1 is if one whole BTC is *ALREADY* priced insanely high.  So no ... your argument doesn't work. 
We're discussing right now.  When one mBTC is worth $x.xxxxxxx1. 
We are not discussing 100 years from now when an mBTC is priced at $1.00
I want to know how it gets to that point.

Next?

The change to mBTC won't in itself change the value of Bitcoin.

The belief is that the general public is badly informed (not a bad belief).

As others have mentioned, the general public may think that you can only buy a whole Bitcoin.

You and I know this to not be the case but the general public don't know this so they don't want to plop down $700 for a Bitcoin.

Now, if you denominate things in mBTC, the purchase price now __appears__ to be $0.70.

Nothing has changed, however, the same general public will now feel it's much more affordable and buy up, say, $7 worth. Heck, some might even go as far as $70.

This opens up the market to the less informed people, resulting in more Bitcoins being bought.

Sure, it's not a huge volume but it's going to be some amount (the long tail).

It's this additional fiat flowing in that will increase the Bitcoin exchange rate. By how much is anyone's guess. It all depends on how many people believe that you can only buy whole Bitcoins AND it's the high price that's preventing them from buying.

Hope that explains things for you.

And at $1 it still won't feel expensive, gearing them up for $1,000 mbtc
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
What doesn't kill you only makes you sicker!

Why would it push the price up? Simple. Each mbtc would be sold for $1 and that would push the final btc price much higher.

The only way 1 mBTC would sell for $1 is if one whole BTC is *ALREADY* priced insanely high.  So no ... your argument doesn't work.  
We're discussing right now.  When one mBTC is worth $x.xxxxxxx1.  
We are not discussing 100 years from now when an mBTC is priced at $1.00
I want to know how it gets to that point.

Next?

The change to mBTC won't in itself change the value of Bitcoin.

The belief is that the general public is badly informed (not a bad belief).

As others have mentioned, the general public may think that you can only buy a whole Bitcoin.

You and I know this to not be the case but the general public don't know this so they don't want to plop down $700 for a Bitcoin.

Now, if you denominate things in mBTC, the purchase price now __appears__ to be $0.70.

Nothing has changed, however, the same general public will now feel it's much more affordable and buy up, say, $7 worth. Heck, some might even go as far as $70.

This opens up the market to the less informed people, resulting in more Bitcoins being bought.

Sure, it's not a huge volume but it's going to be some amount (the long tail).

It's this additional fiat flowing in that will increase the Bitcoin exchange rate. By how much is anyone's guess. It all depends on how many people believe that you can only buy whole Bitcoins AND it's the high price that's preventing them from buying.

Hope that explains things for you.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060

Why would it push the price up? Simple. Each mbtc would be sold for $1 and that would push the final btc price much higher.

The only way 1 mBTC would sell for $1 is if one whole BTC is *ALREADY* priced insanely high.  So no ... your argument doesn't work. 
We're discussing right now.  When one mBTC is worth $x.xxxxxxx1. 
We are not discussing 100 years from now when an mBTC is priced at $1.00
I want to know how it gets to that point.

Next?

I can easily get $1 for mbtc on ebay
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
m is standard for milli
µ is standard for micro, but if you cannot type a µ character then u is standard for micro
n is standard for nano

#1 reason for using nBTC is that it will make everyone will feel very rich because they can easily own millions of nBTC!

Windows Hold alt and pres 230... in case anyone ever wanted to know

I cant do it
Yes you can, you just need a better keyboard. Grin

Alt+230? Huh? Does alt gr + M not work (almost) everywhere? I've been using that forever on all sorts of systems.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Whether mBTC is a nasty move to increase the price or not, I think we should adopt it.
It's much easier for everybody to spend in units and not in 1/1000 or a unit, expect if you are a nerd.
I have no problem myself but I understand that others might do and this can easily help them.
So why not?
legendary
Activity: 4551
Merit: 3445
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
m is standard for milli
µ is standard for micro, but if you cannot type a µ character then u is standard for micro
n is standard for nano

#1 reason for using nBTC is that it will make everyone will feel very rich because they can easily own millions of nBTC!

Windows Hold alt and pres 230... in case anyone ever wanted to know

I cant do it
Yes you can, you just need a better keyboard. Grin
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 250

Why would it push the price up? Simple. Each mbtc would be sold for $1 and that would push the final btc price much higher.

The only way 1 mBTC would sell for $1 is if one whole BTC is *ALREADY* priced insanely high.  So no ... your argument doesn't work.  
We're discussing right now.  When one mBTC is worth $x.xxxxxxx1.  
We are not discussing 100 years from now when an mBTC is priced at $1.00
I want to know how it gets to that point.

Next?

What? 1 mBTC is about 0.7 $ at the moment and has already been worth more than 1 $.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1001

Why would it push the price up? Simple. Each mbtc would be sold for $1 and that would push the final btc price much higher.

The only way 1 mBTC would sell for $1 is if one whole BTC is *ALREADY* priced insanely high.  So no ... your argument doesn't work.  
We're discussing right now.  When one mBTC is worth $x.xxxxxxx1.  
We are not discussing 100 years from now when an mBTC is priced at $1.00
I want to know how it gets to that point.

Next?
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
The scarcity argument you make doesn't make sense in this case although clearly one of the big draws to btc is that it is limited in nature.

Can you explain why it doesn't make sense?

Everyone likes to say "wrong" but nobody gives an explanation why its wrong.

I just end up writing the same thing 50 different ways, and not getting a single explanation why its wrong, in response.

The only thing that can push 1 whole bitcoin price up, is a lack of supply and an overabundance of demand.

Why will switching to mBTC, which alerts people to an "infinite" supply of sub-1BTC purchases, going to do a damn thing to push the price of 1 BTC up?

It may ... but it doesn't *have* to.  It can, in fact, provide 100,000 people with the ability to buy divisions of 1 BTC at a 1 BTC price of $650 without the value of 1BTC going up even one penny.

That was the argument I stated, and I fail to see why its false?

Why would it push the price up? Simple. Each mbtc would be sold for $1 and that would push the final btc price much higher.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1001
The scarcity argument you make doesn't make sense in this case although clearly one of the big draws to btc is that it is limited in nature.

Can you explain why it doesn't make sense?  Everyone likes to say "wrong" but nobody gives an explanation why its wrong.   I just end up writing the same thing 50 different ways, and not getting a single explanation why its wrong, in response.   The only thing that can push 1 whole bitcoin price up, is a lack of supply and an overabundance of demand.   Why will switching to mBTC, which alerts people to an "infinite" supply of sub-1BTC purchases, going to do a damn thing to push the price of 1 BTC up?  It may ... but it doesn't *have* to.  It can, in fact, provide 100,000 people with the ability to buy divisions of 1 BTC at a 1 BTC price of $650 without the value of 1BTC going up even one penny.  That was the argument I stated, and I fail to see why its false?

Quote
stop making treads with the sole purpose of complaining that BTC is not at $10,000 yet. It will happen eventually, but it's not likely to happen overnight, or this month for that matter. Come back next year or so. Some people are just so impatient these days.

Why don't you actually read what I write, so that you don't make inane comments like this.  Nothing in my post (or previous posts) was intended to "complain that we're not at 10,000 yet".  Open your eyes and take the time to actually read what's written.  Maybe this is why I am not getting any intelligent responses.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
m is standard for milli
µ is standard for micro, but if you cannot type a µ character then u is standard for micro
n is standard for nano

#1 reason for using nBTC is that it will make everyone will feel very rich because they can easily own millions of nBTC!

Windows Hold alt and pres 230... in case anyone ever wanted to know

I cant do it
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
m is standard for milli
µ is standard for micro, but if you cannot type a µ character then u is standard for micro
n is standard for nano

#1 reason for using nBTC is that it will make everyone will feel very rich because they can easily own millions of nBTC!

Windows Hold alt and pres 230... in case anyone ever wanted to know
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
I vote nbtc beginning January 1, 2014
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
The problem with mBTC is, four letters/syllables, awkward to say, ugly to write/type. All other major currencies use a three-letter abbreviation. Using mBTC would be more of a defect than having to use decimals.
member
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
corporations have been "splitting" their stock price since the beginnings of the stock market.  It's basic human psychology.  For whatever reason, people don't like to pay $700 for a stock (or for a bitcoin).  That is why master card, for example, recently had a 10 for 1 stock split, which immediately resulted in a big increase in the stock's value (stock split from $780 to $78).  Picture a new bitcoin user goes to a bitcoin atm.  What's more palatable - getting 135 mBTC for your $100 bill or 0.135 bitcoin? For a consumer, isn't it much easier to wrap your head around paying 7.5 mBTC for a coffee as opposed to 0.0075 bitcoin.  To me, bitcoin advocates should all be pushing for exchanges, ATMs, etc to quote bitcoin in terms of mBTC.  The scarcity argument you make doesn't make sense in this case although clearly one of the big draws to btc is that it is limited in nature.
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
It will have nothing to do with anything, except in making some of the numbers easier for people to understand.

With publicly traded companies, companies often split the stock to bring the price down.  For example a stock at $90 per share might do a 4:1 split to drop the price to $22.50 per share.  Nobody makes money from a stock split (except whoever is actually handling the split gets fees for the work), but because on most exchanges, investors need to buy stocks in multiples of 100 shares.  So, bringing the minimum investment down to $2250 from $9000 makes the stock accessible to smaller investors.

If the value of bitcoin were to climb to $10,000/BTC, many people will find it annoying to have to be typing BTC0.0001 to buy a candy bar, and people will do the things people do with numbers with lots of zeros before or after the decimal point, and make errors in order of magnitude.  For this reason, mBTC or perhaps uBTC will make it more convenient.

Having "normal looking" numbers might help demand somewhat, however, as that will seem less hard to understand for some.


I have created numerous threads asking people exactly how Bitcoin is supposed to reach the $10,000 mark.  By what method.  Pages of responses all say "We need to switch to mBTC, which will encourage more people to purchase BTC, which will in turn push the price up".  It dawned on me today that switching to mBTC won't necessarily do a thing to increase price of Bitcoin.  In fact it may cause it to go down.

In my understanding, in order for Bitcoin price to go up, there needs to be (1) increased demand and (2) lack of availability, at any given time.  This is why the price shot up when China stepped in.  Purchases were still mostly in whole Bitcoins, everyone was scrambling to get one, and there were daily shortages.

Switching to mBTC will actually act as a psychological multiplier of increased availability.  Psychologically, people no longer "need to buy 1 whole bitcoin".  Therefore instead of 100 people buying 100 Bitcoins, you could very well have 100,000 people buying 1 Bitcoin.  And they could, theoretically all do so, at an unchanging price of $650 per BTC.  Scarcity goes right out the door.  When something is not scarce, there is no competition, and when there is no competition there is no shortage of supply.  When  there is no shortage of supply, there is no increase in price.  

In order for the price of Bitcoin to rise, there has to be a lack of supply.  The only thing I have ever agreed with "revans" about is the scarcity illusion with Bitcion.  Something that is "infinitely" divisible is not scarce.  Only if Bitcoins become (1) scarce (2) in comparison to the number of people who want to buy them at (3) any given period of time, will the price begin to nudge up.  If everyone can get a portion of a bitcoin at $650, there is nothing which will push the price of 1 bitcoin to $10,000.  You would need billions of people scrambling to buy Bitcoin in waves, and not enough people selling, for the price to rise.  

Thoughts?
member
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
so when does it get decided to make the change.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Carpe Diem
The thing I like about moving to mBTC is that you can own a whole bitcoin then instead of now a bitcoin is fairly expensive. It's like a stock split where the value is not increasing but makes it more palatable to own a decent number of shares.
legendary
Activity: 1096
Merit: 1067
The only thing I have ever agreed with "revans" about is the scarcity illusion with Bitcion.  Something that is "infinitely" divisible is not scarce.


If you could divide a cake into an infinite number of pieces, do you have more cake?.

mbtc is a compromise to folk that need to feel like they have more of something than they have, what the need to start adding extra layers of confusion onto something that already has the average person confused. If you asked me how many btc I have with - 100 mbtc - 100 microbtc -100 nanobtc I wouldn't have a clue  Huh
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 251
Giga
mBTC main argument is for bitcoin utility as a currency.

mBTC 2nd argument was to help fuel mainstream investment, since $1 looks more appealing than $1000 (similar to 1 ounce gold bar vs 1 TTbar)
Pages:
Jump to: