You make an excellent point: Women have different interests. Why should we need to use those interests to achieve an equal number of male and female Bitcoin users? Don't you see the contradiction in that argument?
Bitcoin represents a powerful technology that can benefit both male and female interests(but not xxy/xxyy mosaics as they are too freaky and will leave you lonely and begging for more... they don't deserve bitcoin
). All I am suggesting is that it will be great for us to understand these differences and develop solutions to benefit both males and females. I am under no delusion that we can attain a 50/50 ratio or should even attempt it at this stage.
Again: stop looking at the numbers and treat everyone equally and those with an interest will feel welcome.
Everyone should
not be treated equally... but differently. I have never claimed preferential treatment to women, in fact I have explicitly claimed otherwise.
Problems with women is they want all for the cheap and in return they don't want to sacrifice anything.
Both a sexist statement that also has a lot of truth behind it. For good or bad reasons women are more risk averse.