It could not exist before the internet, but in today's world where Big Brother is watching, it may be more valuable than gold.
This got me thinking. What does it mean to be "more valuable than gold"?
I mean, that makes sense when comparing two materials - like "more valuable PER OUNCE". But how do you compare two things of completely different make-up? It's like comparing Computers and Oranges. (see what I did there?)
It doesn't make sense to compare the price of
one ounce of gold vs. one
whole bitcoin, and say one is more valuable than the other, because the counter-argument would be "well let's use millibitcoins or milligrams or tonnes (or whatever)".
It seems like you have to get a common frame of reference between the two different commodities, in order to say one is more valuable than the other, when they each can be bought in divisible quantities. And I can only think of two frames of reference:
1) The total value of all of this commodity, at market price (what people refer to as Market Cap).
2) The generally accepted risk-weighted rate of return for an investment in this commodity.
We can easily calculate #1, and Bitcoin is nowhere near Gold in that category.
Good luck on calculating #2. I tend to think that Bitcoin has a much higher risk-weighted rate of return than gold at the present time and prices. On the other hand, apparently every seller disagrees.