Topic: Why Token value goes down lower than ICO price after launch? - page 6. (Read 1868 times)
Whenever there is plenty of free coins either as bonus for investors or reward for bounty participants, you are most likely going to experience such situations. It does not mean that the exchange price will no exceed the ICO price at the end but the early dumper will initially have the impact on the price.
It's partly due to the market trend, the marketvus bearish and most coins go under after launch.
Bounties and bonuses also play a role, in the short term value of the tokens.
The price can also be influenced by large holders and manipulated to suit their desires.
Bounties and bonuses also play a role, in the short term value of the tokens.
The price can also be influenced by large holders and manipulated to suit their desires.
i think that is issue of all markets in this down trend situation
maybe too many supply against demand
I think it happend because of tokens has no influence on project. All tokens are just an instrument to collect investments for project development, but if tokens will be a share or asset of project their will have a value, and will no fall on exchang.
There has been many arguments about this topic and while some people put a direct blame to bounty hunters who sell their tokens immediately after ICO and yet very few people can really place hands on the real issue.
Pls click this to see a sample of crypto project token distribution which represents vast majority that falls in this category that I would like to point to as the main reason why the price of some token goes below ICO price after launch.
Sample: https://s33.postimg.cc/stsemoukf/IMG_1533191759678.jpg
Usually the capacity of every project team is never the same, some already have what it takes to finance their project from the beginning while some don't and plan to raise all the money from the token sales and while this helps them to achieve their soft and hard cap, it also places other limitations that is not so obvious
Most investors are profit oriented and wants to make their money either short term or long term and so also is the large group of the bounty hunters.
50% of the token supply and even more goes to pre-sale and public sale which gives the team the required amount needed, then 2.5% goes to the community for airdrop+bounty+bonuses which is where the hunters share from. The pre-sale and private sales usually goes for much lower prices with good discounts compared to the public ICO, which is why it's very attractive to the early investors which later turn to early dumpers. Then after launch, those that bought from pre-sale and ICO dumps the large portion of the coin and forces the price down yet they still feels that it's the 2.5% that the hunters share with airdrop and bonuses that made their price to go down.
Feel free to drop your thoughts on this
Pls click this to see a sample of crypto project token distribution which represents vast majority that falls in this category that I would like to point to as the main reason why the price of some token goes below ICO price after launch.
Sample: https://s33.postimg.cc/stsemoukf/IMG_1533191759678.jpg
Usually the capacity of every project team is never the same, some already have what it takes to finance their project from the beginning while some don't and plan to raise all the money from the token sales and while this helps them to achieve their soft and hard cap, it also places other limitations that is not so obvious
Most investors are profit oriented and wants to make their money either short term or long term and so also is the large group of the bounty hunters.
50% of the token supply and even more goes to pre-sale and public sale which gives the team the required amount needed, then 2.5% goes to the community for airdrop+bounty+bonuses which is where the hunters share from. The pre-sale and private sales usually goes for much lower prices with good discounts compared to the public ICO, which is why it's very attractive to the early investors which later turn to early dumpers. Then after launch, those that bought from pre-sale and ICO dumps the large portion of the coin and forces the price down yet they still feels that it's the 2.5% that the hunters share with airdrop and bonuses that made their price to go down.
Feel free to drop your thoughts on this
I fully support your thoughts. Early investors shed coins to minimize losses in the event of project damping. They sell half, thereby returning their money, and the remainder remain until better times. At the same time, they do not risk anything.
i think thats the common scenario nowadays, it's because investor and bounty hunters dump their coin to the exchange resulting to over supply. And the law of supply and demand applies. If we want to increase the price after ico we should hold our coin a little bit longer.
The price goes down after the end of ico but mostly happen when there higher trading in the market. For investors to buy more coin and hold till price rise up
There has been many arguments about this topic and while some people put a direct blame to bounty hunters who sell their tokens immediately after ICO and yet very few people can really place hands on the real issue.
Pls click this to see a sample of crypto project token distribution which represents vast majority that falls in this category that I would like to point to as the main reason why the price of some token goes below ICO price after launch.
Sample: https://s33.postimg.cc/stsemoukf/IMG_1533191759678.jpg
Usually the capacity of every project team is never the same, some already have what it takes to finance their project from the beginning while some don't and plan to raise all the money from the token sales and while this helps them to achieve their soft and hard cap, it also places other limitations that is not so obvious
Most investors are profit oriented and wants to make their money either short term or long term and so also is the large group of the bounty hunters.
50% of the token supply and even more goes to pre-sale and public sale which gives the team the required amount needed, then 2.5% goes to the community for airdrop+bounty+bonuses which is where the hunters share from. The pre-sale and private sales usually goes for much lower prices with good discounts compared to the public ICO, which is why it's very attractive to the early investors which later turn to early dumpers. Then after launch, those that bought from pre-sale and ICO dumps the large portion of the coin and forces the price down yet they still feels that it's the 2.5% that the hunters share with airdrop and bonuses that made their price to go down.
Feel free to drop your thoughts on this
Pls click this to see a sample of crypto project token distribution which represents vast majority that falls in this category that I would like to point to as the main reason why the price of some token goes below ICO price after launch.
Sample: https://s33.postimg.cc/stsemoukf/IMG_1533191759678.jpg
Usually the capacity of every project team is never the same, some already have what it takes to finance their project from the beginning while some don't and plan to raise all the money from the token sales and while this helps them to achieve their soft and hard cap, it also places other limitations that is not so obvious
Most investors are profit oriented and wants to make their money either short term or long term and so also is the large group of the bounty hunters.
50% of the token supply and even more goes to pre-sale and public sale which gives the team the required amount needed, then 2.5% goes to the community for airdrop+bounty+bonuses which is where the hunters share from. The pre-sale and private sales usually goes for much lower prices with good discounts compared to the public ICO, which is why it's very attractive to the early investors which later turn to early dumpers. Then after launch, those that bought from pre-sale and ICO dumps the large portion of the coin and forces the price down yet they still feels that it's the 2.5% that the hunters share with airdrop and bonuses that made their price to go down.
Feel free to drop your thoughts on this
That is true, bounties might actually hurt the price in the short term - right after the ICO. This however can be managed by either agreeing on locking time of the token or ensuring that the utility of the token ensures trading volumes.
On the other hand I also heared that smart investors also are waiting for these dumps. When bounty hunters drop the tokens and the price goes down, some investors snap them for a very good price. When the market recovers - that seem to be a smart move. But again, this depends on the token.
I have read from the LEDU Token telegram group. That a Token will be stable at least 8 months after launch in exchange.
There has been many arguments about this topic and while some people put a direct blame to bounty hunters who sell their tokens immediately after ICO and yet very few people can really place hands on the real issue.
Pls click this to see a sample of crypto project token distribution which represents vast majority that falls in this category that I would like to point to as the main reason why the price of some token goes below ICO price after launch.
Sample: https://s33.postimg.cc/stsemoukf/IMG_1533191759678.jpg
Usually the capacity of every project team is never the same, some already have what it takes to finance their project from the beginning while some don't and plan to raise all the money from the token sales and while this helps them to achieve their soft and hard cap, it also places other limitations that is not so obvious
Most investors are profit oriented and wants to make their money either short term or long term and so also is the large group of the bounty hunters.
50% of the token supply and even more goes to pre-sale and public sale which gives the team the required amount needed, then 2.5% goes to the community for airdrop+bounty+bonuses which is where the hunters share from. The pre-sale and private sales usually goes for much lower prices with good discounts compared to the public ICO, which is why it's very attractive to the early investors which later turn to early dumpers. Then after launch, those that bought from pre-sale and ICO dumps the large portion of the coin and forces the price down yet they still feels that it's the 2.5% that the hunters share with airdrop and bonuses that made their price to go down.
Feel free to drop your thoughts on this
Pls click this to see a sample of crypto project token distribution which represents vast majority that falls in this category that I would like to point to as the main reason why the price of some token goes below ICO price after launch.
Sample: https://s33.postimg.cc/stsemoukf/IMG_1533191759678.jpg
Usually the capacity of every project team is never the same, some already have what it takes to finance their project from the beginning while some don't and plan to raise all the money from the token sales and while this helps them to achieve their soft and hard cap, it also places other limitations that is not so obvious
Most investors are profit oriented and wants to make their money either short term or long term and so also is the large group of the bounty hunters.
50% of the token supply and even more goes to pre-sale and public sale which gives the team the required amount needed, then 2.5% goes to the community for airdrop+bounty+bonuses which is where the hunters share from. The pre-sale and private sales usually goes for much lower prices with good discounts compared to the public ICO, which is why it's very attractive to the early investors which later turn to early dumpers. Then after launch, those that bought from pre-sale and ICO dumps the large portion of the coin and forces the price down yet they still feels that it's the 2.5% that the hunters share with airdrop and bonuses that made their price to go down.
Feel free to drop your thoughts on this
Jump to: