Topic: Why was my post unfairly deleted? - page 2. (Read 1063 times)

I said via capture site. Not a screencap that could, or could not be edited. I have no memory of this to be fairly real and that's why I asked for a captured page to solidify your argument. Posting a certain amount of times per day anyway isn't against any rules. In fact, their aren't any solid rules here. There are unofficial ones, with a guide saying moderators can do as they wish with posts without following any code of conduct which is referred in the unofficial rule that moderators will interpret rules however they please which gives flexible leeway to come up with rules on the spot if they wish.

Here we go https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14287173

Give proof of that via capture site, and be sure to read my edit in the other post.


I'm not really sure what the problem behind me asking a question as to why a post was deleted constitutes as me being a troll. Again in regards to signature campaigns, take them away and the option cannot be possibly abused. Even though in this specific case, I was yet to be given proof that I abused campaigns anyway.

I posted in one the threads on your spree last week. You pushed nearly 10 posts in meta.

Because one line is off topic doesn't constitute for the post itself to be considered 100% off topic. I don't know. To be honest, I don't really feel like arguing for too long, but I still have my right to ask questions for better understanding of choices being made. I'm sorry that you probably don't feel that way.

because you tend to post in a lot of topics, some older some not, mostly empty 2 liners, sometimes in a row, one can think because of your sig...

This bolded part is off topic.

It was clearly off topic the thread you mention at start. The thread was about trolling and you slowly turned it in to how you felt about mods. Its like what you are attempting to do with your own thread by mentioning being harassed by multiple accounts owned by one person. Its just on and on with you and that is why people are suspicious of the manner you post.

Try to keep to one issue,it might help you real in any issue and stamp it out.

I'm not playing victim. Asking for an explanation isn't playing a victim role. Also, if signature campaigns are wrong, don't have them in the first place because I don't just post to get signature coins. I will have an opinion if I wish to have them as long as I voice openly, honestly, and politely as possible.

In addition of response to how posts function here, occupying multiple accounts for harassment or to support a post a user makes shouldn't be allowed as it gives a false view of how many people actually support an opinion.

You have a way of posting that comes across as insincere and mainly posting for signature payments and subtle trolling.
This post as QS has pointed out is off topic and you are creating a false drama to push up the posts. Have seen posts about you spamming and you may need to look into how you engage this community.

The victim role only goes so far before people tune you out and just gloss over what you bring to the discussion.

I don't see anything in your post that had anything to do with the OP of the thread you posted in.

It wasn't completely off topic though. At the beginning, I started it off as a response to the other post, but it was still rather on topic.

It was off topic. It was a reply to another thread, which was locked.

If you wanted to make that statement in said locked thread then you should have sent a message to a moderator to unlock the thread so you can post said message.

Actually, I do see why it's being considered off topic, because the beginning was in regards to another post made. However in this case it wasn't completely off topic. The topic was about trolling. It was also a response to a moderator saying moderators can have that opportunity to be rude if need be. I see why it can be seen as off topic, but it's omewhat on topic as it is also in regards to moderators being rude, which was the part mentioned with the sentence " Locking the thread right after getting the last word and advising people to not respond to your post is something I found rather childish in my honest opinion" goes with the theme of a moderator making a troll comment.

The post he quoted was from me which was in commentary of moderators being trolls. So yes, I see why it could have been somewhat off topic, but it could have been discussed. Either way, I'd like to apologize and I'll try to stay on topic more. I just don't think it should have been deleted if it could have been discussed in regards to the thread topic.




Here's the full conversation captured if anyone requires it.

http://archive.is/PzftY




Edit: in this thread, my posts were unfairly deleted yet again. Proof:


http://archive.is/gARiv
http://archive.is/GX7Ec


Here are more incase need be. I'm gonna go ahead and lock this thread now. I don't really have time to argue with anyone.

http://archive.is/PzftY
http://archive.is/u9d75
http://archive.is/0c0bL
http://archive.is/gARiv
http://archive.is/GX7Ec
http://archive.is/QixOf
http://archive.is/4A4TB
http://archive.is/awyqj
http://archive.is/1pyVk
http://archive.is/3UklB
http://archive.is/T3oUh

Regards~