Why we are not seeing a native wallet for .. - page 2.

FP91G

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1026

Quote from: swogerino on March 16, 2023, 05:25:06 AM

So there has been enough time for any serious developer to build a native wallet to support ETHW or ETHF the two hard forks after ETH moved to PoS in September 2022.Why should we stick with Metamask and no one cares of building a native wallet or even better to implement these coins in their already developed wallet like Exodus (which has no intentions of doing so) and Atomic Wallet which would have no real problems implementing these coins.

Is this because they are not listed for trade in Binance yet?May be a Binance listing for trading would give them enough boost as for the big wallets to start implementing them and why it is taking so much time for the team behind these projects to come up with their own wallet for these coins?

Probably the metamask wallet is compatible with many web-defi projects and this wallet has many users. How much does it cost to list a coin on the Binance exchange? Probably the projects don't have that much money. Probably someone does not want the miners to earn a lot of money.

Pterosaur

member

Activity: 207

Merit: 12

Syntrum.com

I added ETHW to my trust wallet, the latest update implements the same feature as Metamask, where you can add any chain in the wallet, it's good to see a member talking about Eth Pow, it seems like the world have forgotten about the project already, anyway, projects that are building on ETHW are the proper ones to build a native wallet for ETHW, but 99% of the projects running on ETHW are shitcoins, sorry if this hurt anyone, it's just the truth.

swogerino

legendary

Activity: 3136

Merit: 1233

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: sxemini on March 16, 2023, 09:59:51 AM

Quote from: swogerino on March 16, 2023, 05:25:06 AM

So there has been enough time for any serious developer to build a native wallet to support ETHW or ETHF the two hard forks after ETH moved to PoS in September 2022.Why should we stick with Metamask and no one cares of building a native wallet or even better to implement these coins in their already developed wallet like Exodus (which has no intentions of doing so) and Atomic Wallet which would have no real problems implementing these coins.

Is this because they are not listed for trade in Binance yet?May be a Binance listing for trading would give them enough boost as for the big wallets to start implementing them and why it is taking so much time for the team behind these projects to come up with their own wallet for these coins?

Because we need no "native" wallet for ETHW, because metamask and all other work. Metamask is the "native" wallet if you want, metamask is a wallet app and no ETH only wallet, this wallet app can connect to different networks, if they are compatible. ETHW is a ETH fork, so metamask is compatible.
I see no point for doing this, if it is really needed, than the Developer of ETHW should do it - but as said - no need for this.

Guarda Wallet and Trust Wallet have ETHW support also, Ledger too for example.

I will have a look in those wallets,I know Trust wallet but it is the first time I see this Guarda Wallet.I am asking this as I want to exchange the ETHW directly to ZIL in a wallet for example Atomic Wallet would have been the perfect choice for me as I have staked more than 5000 ZIL so far and I intend to keep staking them as much as I can,that 15% reward yearly is great for me and if the price of ZIL increases that is much much better.Unfortunately Metamask does not do this as they have not a built in exchange which does even small amounts like Atomic does (Exodus crushes you with huge fees and needs bigger amounts) and that is why I was asking.

sxemini

member

Activity: 1558

Merit: 69

Quote from: swogerino on March 16, 2023, 05:25:06 AM

So there has been enough time for any serious developer to build a native wallet to support ETHW or ETHF the two hard forks after ETH moved to PoS in September 2022.Why should we stick with Metamask and no one cares of building a native wallet or even better to implement these coins in their already developed wallet like Exodus (which has no intentions of doing so) and Atomic Wallet which would have no real problems implementing these coins.

Is this because they are not listed for trade in Binance yet?May be a Binance listing for trading would give them enough boost as for the big wallets to start implementing them and why it is taking so much time for the team behind these projects to come up with their own wallet for these coins?

Because we need no "native" wallet for ETHW, because metamask and all other work. Metamask is the "native" wallet if you want, metamask is a wallet app and no ETH only wallet, this wallet app can connect to different networks, if they are compatible. ETHW is a ETH fork, so metamask is compatible.
I see no point for doing this, if it is really needed, than the Developer of ETHW should do it - but as said - no need for this.

Guarda Wallet and Trust Wallet have ETHW support also, Ledger too for example.

swogerino

legendary

Activity: 3136

Merit: 1233

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

So there has been enough time for any serious developer to build a native wallet to support ETHW or ETHF the two hard forks after ETH moved to PoS in September 2022.Why should we stick with Metamask and no one cares of building a native wallet or even better to implement these coins in their already developed wallet like Exodus (which has no intentions of doing so) and Atomic Wallet which would have no real problems implementing these coins.

Is this because they are not listed for trade in Binance yet?May be a Binance listing for trading would give them enough boost as for the big wallets to start implementing them and why it is taking so much time for the team behind these projects to come up with their own wallet for these coins?

Topic: Why we are not seeing a native wallet for .. - page 2. (Read 263 times)