unfortunately, if it's a bubble, then people won't have the opportunity to start anew...they will have nothing...I think that there is such possibility...and so you can say about everything...so we just should think and weigh all the pros and cons
If this is a bubble and people invest their money at these high prices then they have no one else to blame but themselves, investing is always a risk, investing in bitcoin or any alts is risky the rewards are there for anyone that has the guts to invest but if you are ready to get the profits you need to be able to accept the losses as well, if the price crashed we are going to get a lot of topics from newbies saying that bitcoin is a scam when no one forced them to invest in bitcoin money they could not afford to lose. 
Topic: Why you should worry this is a bubble - page 7. (Read 1831 times)
The very main reason to get worried about the bubble is to get loss in profit. But some whales take advantage this by shorting btc.
Isn't going anywere while traders keep making money from the fluctation, the boom will happen when they want to.
It's only the bankers and those who don't understand bitcoins that believe that it's a bubble, whiles they don't believe in bitcoins, we on the other hand will continues to reap the profits whiles they contemplate on if they should invest or not. 
The bubble thing is over hyped. Bubble is usually used in the economy world, the economists believe that anything not seen or not have been touched is a bubble, this is the reason bitcoin is also classified in that but despite that, the price is still going higher .
If we had to believe "experts" back in the days, Bitcoin was even a bubble at the time it was reaching the $1000 mark again after the long bear market we went through. They kept repeating that all the way till where we are right now.I must however admit that at current levels, and with the insane +1000% increase this year, that people might have the impression that we're currently a bubble, or at least working on forming a bubble.
The only thing with bubbles is that people think to know that it will likely pop soon, but there is no way to actually predict this. It may be that we'll keep going up till far in the next year before we see the market plummet badly.
At current levels I don't blame people thinking it's a bubble. This increase is even for Bitcoin standards massive.
A bubble that will not blast.
Maybe it can be called a balloon. Just losing some air and can be pumped back.
I dont want to think like that for now because I feel like I am still starting and still learning more.
Just want to go with the flow without negativity.
It will same as the bubble but the bubble will be matched with the crypto. As you can see just like after jamie already released his statment regarding the cryptocurrency and it seems the bitcoin gets burst. Maybe it can be called a balloon. Just losing some air and can be pumped back.
I dont want to think like that for now because I feel like I am still starting and still learning more.
Just want to go with the flow without negativity.
The price gets plunged a lot. Rather than ballon the ballon can be generated again with the more size.
This bubble even bigger than before.
Isn't going anywere while traders keep making money from the fluctation, the boom will happen when they want to.
The bubble thing is over hyped. Bubble is usually used in the economy world, the economists believe that anything not seen or not have been touched is a bubble, this is the reason bitcoin is also classified in that but despite that, the price is still going higher .
It can be a bubble but that doesn't mean it can't go up to 100k. Also it doesn't mean the value will be zero after the bubble pops. If you have faith in BTC all this bubble talk is essentially irrelevant because you will think that the bubble can burst and Bitcoin can recover from that burst. I don't really care what mainstream media says anyhow they have tons of misconceptions about Bitcoin and their opinions are rather useless if you ask me.
I never against bitcoin but I do agree with you at this point. THe price of bitcoin is way to high and there will be an explosion in the future, a very big one. Many people will commit suicide just like which has happened in the 1929. The world was in the big chaos. Bitcoin will start another chaos in the economy system
A bubble that will not blast.
Maybe it can be called a balloon. Just losing some air and can be pumped back.
I dont want to think like that for now because I feel like I am still starting and still learning more.
Just want to go with the flow without negativity.
Maybe it can be called a balloon. Just losing some air and can be pumped back.
I dont want to think like that for now because I feel like I am still starting and still learning more.
Just want to go with the flow without negativity.
I don't want to seem negative. I'm trying to avoid political discussion. 
I would only like to say a case could be made for nobel prizes being a political tool for bankers.
Paul Krugman has supported many questionable and controversial economic policies over the years as a nobel prize winner in economics. There are some who question whether Al Gore should have won a nobel peace prize for a presentation on global warming. Barack Obama winning a nobel peace prize did raise a few eyebrows, years ago.
It is possible that nobel prizes are given out to those who push political agendas, rather than those who merit it. There used to be excellent scientists and economists like Milton Friedman who deserved a nobel prize. These days, it might be fair to say the quality of work awarded a nobel isn't what it used to be, unfortunately.
It is the same as always, at first an institution performs a function but later that institution becomes a target and becomes hijacked and then is used to further the goals of the group that hijacked the institution, it is nothing new, that strategy has been used for a very long time and no matter the size or the type of institution it is a strategy that is guaranteed to succeed with time. I would only like to say a case could be made for nobel prizes being a political tool for bankers.Paul Krugman has supported many questionable and controversial economic policies over the years as a nobel prize winner in economics. There are some who question whether Al Gore should have won a nobel peace prize for a presentation on global warming. Barack Obama winning a nobel peace prize did raise a few eyebrows, years ago.
It is possible that nobel prizes are given out to those who push political agendas, rather than those who merit it. There used to be excellent scientists and economists like Milton Friedman who deserved a nobel prize. These days, it might be fair to say the quality of work awarded a nobel isn't what it used to be, unfortunately.
Why should I worry?
Even if it is a bubble, I do not worry in life. Worrying causes stress and it is never a good thing. Worrying should be avoided at all costs. Even if your house burns down, you should never worry about anything for the reason above.
Even if it is a bubble, I do not worry in life. Worrying causes stress and it is never a good thing. Worrying should be avoided at all costs. Even if your house burns down, you should never worry about anything for the reason above.
Well as long as you believes and trust bitcoin you shouldn't be worrisome.
Bitcoin is less than a bubble but more than a bearish act and if the bubble burst out it will definitely follow by a bull run.
When Bitcoins is made into a political commodity then what happens is a debate about fear.
Why only the bubbles of concern to the debate. Forget, how bitcoins prices are rising sharply. Why not discuss how the benefits that bitcoins offers, while some countries are skeptical of blocks it.
Japan, US, South-Korean, Denmark, Finland, are those countries whom legalize it. They have received bitcoin technology because it can benefit for the people economy.
Why only the bubbles of concern to the debate. Forget, how bitcoins prices are rising sharply. Why not discuss how the benefits that bitcoins offers, while some countries are skeptical of blocks it.
Japan, US, South-Korean, Denmark, Finland, are those countries whom legalize it. They have received bitcoin technology because it can benefit for the people economy.
unfortunately, if it's a bubble, then people won't have the opportunity to start anew...they will have nothing...I think that there is such possibility...and so you can say about everything...so we just should think and weigh all the pros and cons
Let's be honest, there is still a lot of unknown in Bitcoin as it's the first cryptocurrency that spread that much.
Lets be honest and read the whitepaper about bitcoin written by satoshi first and understand that properly before making any comments. As we say incomplete knowledge is a dangerous thing. The code is in github and can be evaluated by anyone for checking the blockchain and how it works.Quote
This unknown part is risky as well, since nobody knows for sure if it won't crash one day or somebody will find a way to trick the system.
Actually speaking even if a crash occurs does that matter? I see shillposts like this everyday and more shills in real life who think bitcoin is a covered up ponzi and I keep thinking one thing - do these people even understand how blockchain works?Quote
So not surprised that some people think it's a bubble, but from another side it can be the beginning of something huge and never seen before.
If people accept bitcoin and blockchain technology it will be the new version of banks and finance. I don't want to seem negative. I'm trying to avoid political discussion. I would only like to say a case could be made for nobel prizes being a political tool for bankers.
Paul Krugman has supported many questionable and controversial economic policies over the years as a nobel prize winner in economics. There are some who question whether Al Gore should have won a nobel peace prize for a presentation on global warming. Barack Obama winning a nobel peace prize did raise a few eyebrows, years ago.
It is possible that nobel prizes are given out to those who push political agendas, rather than those who merit it. There used to be excellent scientists and economists like Milton Friedman who deserved a nobel prize. These days, it might be fair to say the quality of work awarded a nobel isn't what it used to be, unfortunately.
I would only like to say a case could be made for nobel prizes being a political tool for bankers.Paul Krugman has supported many questionable and controversial economic policies over the years as a nobel prize winner in economics. There are some who question whether Al Gore should have won a nobel peace prize for a presentation on global warming. Barack Obama winning a nobel peace prize did raise a few eyebrows, years ago.
It is possible that nobel prizes are given out to those who push political agendas, rather than those who merit it. There used to be excellent scientists and economists like Milton Friedman who deserved a nobel prize. These days, it might be fair to say the quality of work awarded a nobel isn't what it used to be, unfortunately.
Criticism of the Nobel process notwithstanding, I do think Shiller's pedigree speaks for itself. As fuzzy as economics is as a science, Shiller's work has been more concrete in the relationship between asset prices and the inefficiency of markets, correlating people's inability to predict reasonable asset prices to the cause of bubbles. As with the housing bubble, he identified that it was a bubble long before other folks (he was talking about it in 2005, two years before it became evident to others who "called" it before completely coming off the rails in 2008). What concerns me is how similar his descriptions are to Bitcoin to how he talked about the housing bubble.
Let's be honest, there is still a lot of unknown in Bitcoin as it's the first cryptocurrency that spread that much.
This unknown part is risky as well, since nobody knows for sure if it won't crash one day or somebody will find a way to trick the system.
So not surprised that some people think it's a bubble, but from another side it can be the beginning of something huge and never seen before.
The start of something huge bitcoin will be only then when I see that people use it as currency. Now his people are only for accumulation. We are turning it into a bubble. Only depends on us our future. If we miss the chance that another such chance we will not receive. We will regret it for the rest of my life. This unknown part is risky as well, since nobody knows for sure if it won't crash one day or somebody will find a way to trick the system.
So not surprised that some people think it's a bubble, but from another side it can be the beginning of something huge and never seen before.
Let's be honest, there is still a lot of unknown in Bitcoin as it's the first cryptocurrency that spread that much.
This unknown part is risky as well, since nobody knows for sure if it won't crash one day or somebody will find a way to trick the system.
So not surprised that some people think it's a bubble, but from another side it can be the beginning of something huge and never seen before.
This unknown part is risky as well, since nobody knows for sure if it won't crash one day or somebody will find a way to trick the system.
So not surprised that some people think it's a bubble, but from another side it can be the beginning of something huge and never seen before.
That's the true statement, as it is speculative in nature each and everything the people reveal about bitcoin has got its importance. Particularly bitcoin when discussed or getting more public awareness makes it more stronger and the same is driving the price forward reach bigger values.
Jump to: