I really don't get the surprise or outrage at this. Fuck yes, I want the CIA to be able to do all the shit in this document, and more. I want them to be able to see through fucking walls, to be honest. Y'all don't get this privacy shit, so let me break it down.
YOU ARENT THAT FUCKING IMPORTANT. The government is not trying to spy on regular people. There are more people than analysts, exponentially so. there is no way they have the time or resources to listen in on individual citizens in a meaningful way, because there is a whole nations worth of communications to sort through, every 24 hours. If you feel some kind of way about 'radical Islamic terrorism', then why would you feel some kind of way about our government having the tools to catch said terrorist?
So unless you are:
A international drug dealer
A self radicalized crazy head
A spy
President Trump
you really aren't cool enough for the government to be spending money to watch you look at interracial porn and read the forum.
This is was not a win for the common guy. Far from it. This is a huge blow to our national security, in the face of growing conflict with multiple nations. And the timing is suspect, giving the growing scrutiny on the intelligence community after Trump's seemingly erroneous accusations.
You may have a mild point in some respects if there were any indication that the CIA has ever worked for 'Americans' at all. Everything I can see is that the focus of many, if not most, of their projects are done for the benefit of a handful of wealthy elites and the entities which are important to this class. Mostly corporations and 'foundations.' As these entities become more 'multi-national' and 'globalist' the arguments that the CIA somehow benefits most Americans vanishes still farther. The term 'help' means different things to different people. Some red-blooded American social engineers find it very helpful to have a lot of heroin available in inner cities for instance. Or to have an 'ISIL' at all.
As for these tools, they might help catch a pedo ring, but then they have to let the creeps off scott-free else they lose their electronic toys. I would suggest that spending resources on old-school gumshoe techniques would be a lot more 'helpful' to Joe Sixpack (and his kids) than these tools.
Nextly, any genuine threat is not going to be ignorant about device security. If anything such a target will turn these tools back on the CIA which is modestly easy to do given the nature of data processing.
You did hit the nail on the head in pointing out that the tools are great for making sure that your sponsors remain in power and their opponents don't have a chance. That is exactly what I figured would happen. I remain amazed that Trump pulled it off in spite of everything stacked against him. Including significant parts of the CIA. (Other parts, or former parts, may have helped him significantly however.)
(I would clarify that certain elements of the CIA do seem to do a valuable job and do it reasonably well, but I'm far from certain that they even constitute a majority of the operation. Most CIA workers themselves probably don't even know, and curiosity about this is probably not at all welcome. That suspicion comes from my experience in large organizations in the private sector which are compartmentalized by accident as much as by design.)
Why would the United States government need a sponsor again? For money?
And why would the CIA have an issue with Trump? He's a perfectly normal, law abiding citizen, no? So easy for the 'deep state' to kill him before he got into office, with all the 'liberal tears' that were shed. Yet he's still breathing, and racking up one of the most impressive disapproval ratings in the history of the office.
Yeah, big brother and such.
I used to believe in the Illuminati. Then I realized that people are assholes, and if you get enough evil assholes in a room trying to rule the world, suddenly, it isn't so easy to agree on who gets China and who gets Sweden.
You are describing a monolithic evil, in a government with multiple political platforms.
If you ascribe to this philosophy, think about the motivations of the actors you accuse. Money is the motivator, correct? Why would the United States government want to remove any tax paying constituents? They pay the bills, provide the organs, are slavesnto the elite, whatever your kink is. But for one of the most funded organizations in the actual Planet Earth, so funded we don't even actually know how many funds they get (black budget), so powerful that we can kill foreign heads of state with impunity, well, why would that behemoth be in bed with mere mortals?
You are confusing the intelligence community with Congress. The House and Senate are the star fuckers. They need sponsors to pay their bills. Pretty sure we would just inflate the money supply instead of losing operational security by accepting donor funds.