Topic: Will Kamala Harris satisfy progressives? - page 2. (Read 291 times)

There has been a continual drumbeat to whip up hatred of each and every Republican president for decades. This has gotten considerably worse with the nonstop lying and fake conspiracies of Trump term 1 of 2.

I think there is no such thing here as "progressives of the party learned their mistake in 2o16 by not voting for Clinton."

First, all engaging in the D are defined as progressives.

Second, they'd rather stay home with a couple joints of the good stuff rather than go out to vote for Broomstick Hillary, now they have a similar issue with Bejing Biden.

I guarantee you their coasting along mellow on voting night is better than voting for two loser bitches.

Ever since Biden picked Harris to be his VP candidate for the Democrat ticket, there's been two questions in the back of my mind:

Will Kamala satisfy the progressives of the party? Will a Biden/Harris ticket bring out the progressives of the party?

I think yes. I think that the progressives of the party learned their mistake in 2016 by not voting for Clinton. They may have not liked her, but they HATE TRUMP. They may not like Biden and Harris but the progressives of the party HATE TRUMP.

I personally think she won't satisfy the progressives, neither will Biden, but they will swallow their pride and accept them cause they're not Trump.

Any thoughts?

I feel Biden took this decision because black people are really in much hate with the Trump's government and since she is a black origin he though it would bring more support from the black people and also this decision really hyped their party in the recent days which might be effective since the election period is getting nearer.

I have a third question, which I think is the most important.

Can she ride Hillary's broomstick without falling off, like Hillary did?

I have a third question, which I think is the most important.

Can she ride Hillary's broomstick without falling off, like Hillary did?

Ever since Biden picked Harris to be his VP candidate for the Democrat ticket, there's been two questions in the back of my mind:

Will Kamala satisfy the progressives of the party? Will a Biden/Harris ticket bring out the progressives of the party?

I think yes. I think that the progressives of the party learned their mistake in 2016 by not voting for Clinton. They may have not liked her, but they HATE TRUMP. They may not like Biden and Harris but the progressives of the party HATE TRUMP.

I personally think she won't satisfy the progressives, neither will Biden, but they will swallow their pride and accept them cause they're not Trump.

Any thoughts?

After announcing her as his running mate, Joe Biden gushed about how Kamala Harris is supposedly a "fearless fighter for the little guy, and one of the country's finest public servants." But how can this be true when Kamala was a quintessential bad cop during her tenure as San Francisco's chief prosecutor?

In his book Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America's Progressive Elite, Peter Schweizer explains how Kamala failed to prosecute even one case of child sex abuse by Roman Catholic priests, despite having numerous cases thrown her way.

During the 13 years that Kamala was a district attorney, and later attorney general, she systematically covered for the big guys while betraying the little guys – though you are unlikely to hear about any of this from the mainstream media, which is worshiping Kamala almost to the degree that it worshiped Barack Obama.

While at least 50 other major cities at that time were busy prosecuting pedophile priests for molesting and raping young boys, Kamala "would strangely hide vital records on abuses that had occurred," Schweizer contends. Kamala also retaliated against a district attorney who tried to do the job that she refused to do, almost as if she herself was secretly guilty.

"The bombshell details show that while Harris's predecessor, former San Francisco District Attorney Terence Hallinan, had launched an aggressive investigation into priests of the Archdiocese of San Francisco accused of sexual abuse, Harris's campaign to unseat Hallinan showed an unusual influx of unparalleled donations from high-level officials of the Catholic Church," writes Dr. Susan Berry for Breitbart News.

By the way, more news about corrupt Kamala is available at KamalaHarris.news.

Kamala Harris is complicit in allowing innocent children to be sexually victimized by Roman Catholic priests

The very same woman who now wants to control the amount of red meat that Americans are allowed to eat was nowhere to be found in pursuing actual justice against heinous child sex abusers who were taking advantage of innocent children within the confines of religion, which is about as heinous as it gets.

"Harris had no particular ties to the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations, but the money still came in large, unprecedented sums," Schweizer writes, noting that Kamala maintained deep financial ties to the religious child sex abusers she sought to protect.

Over the course of many years, various Roman Catholic organizations and individuals trying to protect the reputation of their religion amid compiling evidence of pedophilia among its leadership essentially paid off Kamala to keep these crimes under wraps – and it worked marvelously.

"Though Harris has touted her early career as a sexual crimes prosecutor, after she won her run-off campaign against Hallinan, her office actually worked to cover up the records of claims of sexual abuse by priests of the San Francisco archdiocese," Dr. Berry further notes.

Kamala's office claimed at the time that it did this to protect the child victims of sex abuse at the hands of Catholic leadership. But how does burying vital records and refusing to prosecute criminals in any way amount to protection? The only people protected were Kamala's donors, which just goes to show the type of person she actually is, despite all the praise and worship from the mainstream media.

They disagree on healthcare which is major. Kamala Harris wanted to phase out private insurance over a 10 year period and give medicare for all.

But I wouldn't hold it to her because she was pandering to the progressives during the primaries. She'll change her policy stances based on whatever will get her elected whether it's advocating for a ban on fracking, medicare for all, decriminalizing border crossing, or banning plastic straws.

Does anyone actually think Kamala Harris will be a champion for progressives?

Biden and Kamala are pretty close on most things so I don't think Kamala taking over would change much policy-wise.