She did not make any statements that she would support cryptocurrencies if elected, she only said that she would promote the development of AI and digital assets as well as protect investors. This is a neutral statement that any candidate or president who is not overly concerned about the market would make because it would not be in their best interest to publicly oppose the industry.
But just pray that whoever is elected will be more positive and supportive of Bitcoin,
because if they will only oppose it will also affect the regulation and the future of Bitcoin, even if it is not completely.
It's still about politics, but Bitcoin won't be fully affected just because of the political interests of each candidate.
So, in my opinion, we should not rely too much on what happened in history to predict the future because the impact of each period is not the same. We should be optimistic about the last quarter of the year because of the election, the Fed still has 2 more rate cuts before the end of the year...those are the things we rely on to be more optimistic.
It is not always based on the past, it is only as a history that needs to know that every October in the last 5 years is quite good with a bigger increase.
But after all, History, which is data in the past, can be a reference to determine where the market will go.
And there are many factors that also affect how trends will occur in the future.