Topic: Will regulation kill cryptos? - page 6. (Read 829 times)
In my opinion, regulations are much more helpful because they are filtering the bad ones and showcase the good ones. Regulations will make people understand that cryptocurrencies are not all about drugs and hacks like they always used to think.
Regulators want to make sure they protect investors from scams, while at the same time allowing the industry to develop and deploy the new technology in interesting ways. Overregulation could move the action elsewhere, which is what happened in China.
It’s too early to tell who's doing the best job of setting the rules. Nations are taking various tasks.
What do you think?
It’s too early to tell who's doing the best job of setting the rules. Nations are taking various tasks.
What do you think?
Well obviously, everything that is too much can only be bad or cause bad. If you ask me, I would really agree with regulation because besides the fact that it can protect a lot of investors and lessen all the scam coins out there, it is the only way we can go to be able to reach a scenario where there is already mass adoption happening. But if regulated in a wrong way that takes advantage of the crypto people, then that would be really bad and might do the opposite than the increase of demand.
It won't but it will change a few things with cryptocurrency for sure, I believe it's the missing
piece to make crypto more legit and proficiently resplendent with governments and other
authorities. Regulation may take away or replace certain privileges or aspects that
cryptocurrencies enjoy and exploit at the moment, with that out of the way cryptocurrency
could move further in the business mainstream and supersede in the financial market.
Regulation is inevitable with crypto, it may take some time but it will make lasting positive
changes in the field of cryptocurrency.
piece to make crypto more legit and proficiently resplendent with governments and other
authorities. Regulation may take away or replace certain privileges or aspects that
cryptocurrencies enjoy and exploit at the moment, with that out of the way cryptocurrency
could move further in the business mainstream and supersede in the financial market.
Regulation is inevitable with crypto, it may take some time but it will make lasting positive
changes in the field of cryptocurrency.
I don’t think that any possible regulation and coordination could harm bitcoin so much that it won’t exist anymore. Undoubtedly it will slow down bitcoin development.
I think that the cryptocurrencies market, especially the ICO, should have an adjustment to control that ICOs must meet the criteria to release Token to the market. Because now there are many fraudulent ICO was launched only to raise funds of investors then disappeared. Therefore, the regulation of organizations and communities to avoid risk for investors when investing in ICO.
Supposedly a regulation will make the crypto stronger, yes when the regulation supports the development of crypto. While when a regulation inhibits crypto it will only worsen the state and destroy the crypto world. Until now we are all still trying to make the crypto market getting better and try to convince the government that crypto is a medium of financial transaction that is suitable to be used, especially in the future we will face increasing technological progress.
I have long been in bitcoin and of course before I enter it in bitcoin I first informed the regulation here about a cryptocurrencies knowing my regulation to shut down crypto is not in a bitcoin rules .. because the crypto is a good profits bitcoin is a cryptocurrency that people are aware of are currencies that are inivetable and necessary for those preventing it and cryptocurrency is not illegal entities and digital currency in all countries. 
I am very concerned how easy it is for some one to set up a fake ico scamming millions from unsuspecting persons and there is no authority or institution that you can check with to verify the authenticity said ico , will regulation kill cryptos ? i think it will at first result in a decline but very soon after that decline confidence in the market will return as persons now feel safer , and im sure people are more likely to make larger investments in the industry if they feel safer when they are doing these investments, the average man isn't overly concerned about regulations infact i think he will welcome this move .
Regulators want to make sure they protect investors from scams, while at the same time allowing the industry to develop and deploy the new technology in interesting ways. Overregulation could move the action elsewhere, which is what happened in China.
It’s too early to tell who's doing the best job of setting the rules. Nations are taking various tasks.
What do you think?
It’s too early to tell who's doing the best job of setting the rules. Nations are taking various tasks.
What do you think?
cryptos are products of a high technology. no one can stop technologies, precisely technologies support laws. this means no one can kill cryptos except technologies itself. survival cryptos depend on the development of its technology.
Regulators want to make sure they protect investors from scams, while at the same time allowing the industry to develop and deploy the new technology in interesting ways. Overregulation could move the action elsewhere, which is what happened in China.
It’s too early to tell who's doing the best job of setting the rules. Nations are taking various tasks.
What do you think?
It’s too early to tell who's doing the best job of setting the rules. Nations are taking various tasks.
What do you think?
cryptos are products of a high technology. no one can stop technologies, precisely technologies support laws. this means no one can kill cryptos except technologies itself. survival cryptos depend on the development of its technology.
At some point it will make the crypto price lower but it will make the crypto stronger and reliable. It will lessen the mafia and scam activities, this is for good. Just think of the good side.
I see though the government implements the regulation for crypto but if it has to kill the crypto it will not happen and that is just rule. government is not the creator of bitcoin so nobody can kill bitcoin.
Depends with the kind of regulations in play, some might be too harsh for crypto to take, while others can work to it's advantage. If its banned then it will be unfortunate, if its regulation that will see crypto legalized then it may work to its advantage as more investors will come on board
Regulation will enhance the growth of cryptocurrency and not kill it, it will drastically reduce the number of scam cases in the space, Viable ICO willl be develop, With regulation in the space you can be sure your investment is secure.
You can not kill him, we know that this is a form of free trade, so you will always find ways to circumvent such restrictions and in addition to that ... In the case of companies or large corporations that do not allow it they will end up making a transfer to Japan surely.
I believe that an eventual regularization of the crypto market would have many advantages and benefits, as long as it leaves enough space for this field of digital technology to develop and fulfill its primary purposes of decentralization and anonymity; However, I believe that there will always be severe setbacks to harmonize in a convenient way the interests of the central governments and financial authorities, on the one hand, and that of the users and developers of cryptocurrencies, on the other.
Don't think so. Relegations can be not harm.
Government can't can't be the regulator of crytocurrency, bitcoin has the decentralized system, which can't be control by any government authority, try to control crytocurrency is the beginning of end of bitcoin.
Regulators want to make sure they protect investors from scams,
That's what they want you to think. They offer no real protection and their regulation comes at a price. Government's aren't a charity. They aren't doing anything to make your life easier. They are doing it so that they can control you, and most importantly profit from new business deals.
They can start selling worthless licenses at high prices and make money this way, at the same time posing as the saviors and protectors. Same shit, new wrap.
Regulators want to make sure they protect investors from scams
in honest government that would be the main concern, but for many governments this is a political threat, they are not concerned about their citizens, they are concerned about their own power that can be threatened
imagine a poor farmer, invest $ 1000 and in one year make a profit of $17000 and that same farmer expand his business, in the time of campaign the government comes to do politics, but this time finds all the people of the village well in life, you must already imagine that the government will no longer have to make false promises because it is easier to deceive the hungry people than to deceive a people with a full belly.
What do you think?
the regulations help us
Jump to: