Topic: Will Trust System become obsolete? - page 3. (Read 788 times)

Listen Fuck Face.. take 3 seconds to click your trust, now look at who has left you trust.. It might be a good idea to write the name down or take a picture as you seem to get confused easily. Then come back into this thread, open the thread and look at my name, then look at the name of the other person you have been rude to..

oh shock and fucking horror.. you are having a rant at the wrong people. are you off your meds? has your mrs left you? or is it that you are genuinely just off your fucking rocker.

There are enough threads showing what you both losers are doing.

I made my point if my negativ feedback won't disappear i will take action to teach some people a lesson since i don't need any positiv feedback like you losers
but also won't allow anyone to make any kind of false claim against me.

P.S Wer hat Angst vor dem schwarzen Mann

Too tight? Cheeky fuck.. but no I do not offer a loan service or escrow or manage campaigns. I do buy collectibles, speak out against scams and make merit points rain..

Maybe one of the above pissed the prick off

TBalls, you doing loans? Haven't seen you give one, you're too tight a cunt for that.
I havent been giving any in over 2 years either, haven't even really started with it before I had enough.

So neither you or I are lenders, now where's that group everyone is talking about?
That background noise is always saying you and talks like we do something, but...I didnt. What did you do again?

Did you not get a loan?? Butt hurt as you couldn't buy some rice and peas??  Why all the hatred? It's not going to get you any merits

Its just a proof you small "lender group" have a clearly ego issue who are abusing the trust system.

Nothing more.I guess people can see for what you guys are giving negativ feedback and thats you who deserve the most negativ feedback from the community.
It will surely help your lending threads

I'm mellow with Og and last I checked Og was mellow with me.
If they aren't, that's too bad, but nothing I can change about that.

Way to pull out 2 year old logs that should remain burried in order to stirr some shit, though.
Next time, try something that isn't resolved/ancient.

Get a decent source dickhead. OG is the biggest trust abuser out there, he also doesn't pay back BTC loans in full. Lutpin is legit and you are a scummy moron

Looks like other serious people also claim you guys abused the trust system

I didn't even give you feedback. I simply disagreed with your post, which was enough for you to go on this...rant.

Nobody will, your feedback doesnt matter. At best, it's an annoyance. But those can be ignored. As might your posts be by many.
The biggest impact you will have is...well, yeah...

Its the same reason you guys give negativ feedback.
Its based on an unoffical rule which i decided with 3 other people will be created today but which won't be enforced.
Since you break this rule not important its unoffical and you never consent to it 50 people who will agree with me is going to negativ feedback you.
The same way you guys negativ feedbacked me and defended it.
Its based on an unoffical rule which i never consent on.

So i'm basicly just going to use the same reason on which you guys gave me negativ feedback
(or wait nobody showed me a rule which is against buying accounts)

so if you ask to get me banned maybe first ask to get yourself banned for giving negativ feedback for unoffical non enforced rules

Will see how you guys will change quickly your minds once you will get 50 negativ feedbacks from random people for breaking their own unoffical rule you never consent to

Knock yourself out. 50 negs for disagreeing on a post, that's a new one. I'm sure theymos will have a nice place on the trust spam banlist for you.
It's proven btw, you should have lookeded that up before posting.

says a troll based on your trust feedback lol


I just proofed there is no such rule.
You guys are clearly abusing the trust system.
You abuse them against me i will start abusing it against you guys.You can expect to get tomorrow 50 negativ feedbacks for breaking my inoffical not enforced rule

Lutpin is right and secondary to that you come across as a right tosser

LOL

Are you so dumb ?
You show me something like that, that this is a rule ?It just says he might get.It doesn't say its not allowed to ask for loan without collateral.

Nice interpretation to your farvorite heh ?






Like i said a small group abusing the trust system for an inoffical rule which nobody accepted.
Today i make an inofficial rule that from day 28.01.18 each lender will get a negativ trust for lending coins for a higher intterest rate than 0.01% per day .Thats the minimum requirement most people are asking for and if not given it could lead to a negativ feedback.....

Sorry, all I could understand was someone being butthurt and a few insults.
If you want to further pursue this discussion, start a reputation thread about your rating.

---

I'll leave you one thing, though:
[EDU] The Rule of "No Collateral, No Loan" - IGNORE AT YOUR OWN RISK! (sticky thread, thus sanctioned by moderation)

community consensuce ?

LOL what a joke.
I'm a long time member and i never consent to any of that action nor the majority of these members here.
Its only a small group with ego issues who try to play sheriff and defend their own scammy business.
But its nice they listed each and every loan they gave.......their taxdepartment love this kind of people.

And maybe you can explain to me even if somebody would be breaking a community consensus (which doesn't exist and he never agreed on this so its not liable to him)
how a simple question if he can get a small loan without colleteral makes him a scammer that people post a feedback with the title "scammer"
Show me the proof that he is a scammer and not just a broke guy trying to find a start.

You dickheads deserve to be called scammers for your poor arguments and trying to force your so called "community consensus" which doesn't exist and more important which have no impact on the rules members agreed on.
You dickhead even understand what terms are ?Its a legal contract between the forum owner and the community member and you fuckhead think you can just edit or add some points based on a few brain fucked community members ?

Go back you redneck from where you came from if you don't understand the diffrence.
Demanding themself a free market but calling people scammers who are simply buying accounts
or just ask for a small loan.
You deserve to get kicked out of the crypto community

Giving me negativ trust and calling me a scammer because i bought for a customer an account so he can post pictures even its not against forum terms ?
Where did i scammed someone you asshole @actmyname .Which term did i broke ?Show me the term which i broke you punk for giving me and hundred of other peoples your poor comments

There is no forum rule against scamming either, you still don't do it.
Community rules add limits where the forum can't. One rule the community agrees on (it's even in the lending guidlines and stickied in the section) is the collateral rule.
You may disagree with that, but a majority of users does not, there is consensus for this rule.

Again, forum rules and community rules. The first part are the rules the forum makes (those that can get you banned). They might allow it.
The second part are the rules that the community agrees on (those that you eg can get negative trust for).
Account sales are frowned upon and it's likely for you to get either neutral of negative feedback when you are participating in them.
You may dislike this, I may even disagree with this, but that's the community consensus.

I havent been lending since early 2016, gains that were made have been reported should they fall under any taxable event.
You don't need to worry about how I tax my crypto, that's for my CPA and tax office to determine.

I'm in crypto since 2012 and don't need to scam people by giving loans for such high interrest rate.
You losers should first educate yourself.
I made a copy of all your listed loans and will forward it soon to your tax department.

No. Feedback/trust are completely separate systems and should be kept so. That's not to say people can't redeem themselves by being a quality contributor, but merely doing so won't or shouldn't necessarily eradicate or invalidate past 'crimes'. It would also depend on the type of crime or infraction that someone did. Some people can certainly be forgiven in some circumstances whilst other's can't. Sometimes people can change their ways or be forgiven for petty crimes made out of desperation or naivety, but some are so serious they shouldn't be forgotten about or 'expunged' from their record here and merely getting merit points shouldn't overrule that. Each situation should be taken on a case by case basis though.