Topic: Windhanenergy = Resolved without any issues (Read 800 times)

~snip

Whether the ICO is a scam or not is irrelevant.

I have been in 3 groups recently were Icoethics has labeled scam based on nothing.

Snip

They used fake team members and a plagiarized whitepaper. Having a website that is under development is no excuse to use photos of other people without their consent. There is also no excuse for plagiarizing a whitepaper. Both can be considered as an offence/crime. Windham has corrected their mistakes and ICOEthics has redacted their rating, problem solved.

I have never seen them call an ICO a scam without providing the necessary evidence so don't try to portrait them as incompotent or unfair.

Whether the ICO is a scam or not is irrelevant. The mere fact of the matter is that icoethics and others like you are a discrace! You do no good yourself you just say everything is a scam while sitting in your ivory tower. Sure a lot of ICO’s are scams, however you have a growing reputation of being an idiot and discussed in many circles. You jump the gun and say everything is a scam just to make a name for yourself. I have been in 3 groups recently were Icoethics has labeled scam based on nothing. Most people think your an idiot but sometimes the damage you can do to a legitimate ICO is beyond repair. I don’t think that is ethical. I actually know someone involved in windhan and know it’s a legitimate company. You found the website weeks before it was released somehow and branded it a scam while it was underdevelopment. Yours a discrasce! Maybe get a real job and stop trying to bring everyone else down who is actually trying to do something!

Have the documents been verified or translated?

Have the documents been verified or translated?

Hello Team,

Thank you for providing documents and especially for making the video of your team - this is something that we dont see often, a project willing to make video of their team.  We accept as valid evidence and we changed the subject headlines to Resolved without any issues.

Hello again,

Meet the Windhan Team

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11xLrlZwJzQ&feature=youtu.be

~
Final Thoughts

1. We are not blaming anyone, just explaining how our mistake happened.
2. We weren't approaching potential investors with an unfinished website and whitepaper, just advisors.
3. There is a difference between a project launch and a website launch. If you read our message again, we specifically said "we had not even launched the project"
4. Mistakes are not unprofessional, they are a part of the process.

Best regards,
Windhan Team

...You might ask why are we approaching potential advisors with an unfinished, unpolished website and the answer is simple - to save a bit of time by doing these two things simultaneously.

...Fake team: At the time we hadn't publicly launched yet so, yes, our site contained some placeholder pictures and names...

...Richard Reinert is a well-known guy in the London finance scene and you can watch an interview with him on our website...

...Here are our legal documents...

...This project has nothing to hide, so please let us know how can we move forward...

I am the supporter of windhan energy and invest money in there project.You are the first who  blame people,without any reason ,if you are not promoting your Bounty management schemes,stop writing or promoting your banners.You guys are talking about my account,yes i created in 1 day,to give you the appropriate answers.One sided conversation is not good,so thats why i jump in.
To blame others and teach others,better look at yourself.

So,you trying to be a inspector here,who knows everything and other people can just listen to you.Just checked there website,looks great.Obviusly ,people do mistakes and learn from it.
You are advertising your bounty campaign here and wants to sell your services to ICOs or STOs,but do you know thoses teams or projects,absolutly no. Just who will pay for your services,you can sing a romantic song for that company.

Hi there, I see there have been some doubts about our legitimacy. We have started a project thread, you can come over and ask us anything, we will be glad to answer your questions.

In regards to the claims in this thread --->

Fake team: At the time we hadn't publicly launched yet so, yes, our site contained some placeholder pictures and names. The ones who had real people behind them are the already on-boarded team members. Richard Reinert is a well-known guy in the London finance scene and you can watch an interview with him on our website. As for Martins Paegle - he is both on our and AsicVault team. Since we are fully launched, all the team members and advisors are visible on the website.

Plagiarism: We talked to the copywriter. The white paper was constantly being polished for the launch, therefore, the copywriter put a placeholder text of the same idea just to work on it later. We talked about that with him, said it wasn't a good thing to do. Currently, we have checked the white paper with Grammarly and it shows that our copywriter has corrected himself.

You might ask why are we approaching potential advisors with an unfinished, unpolished website and the answer is simple - to save a bit of time by doing these two things simultaneously. We may have made a mistake with that one, but overall we have nothing to hide. Come on our thread and we will answer all your questions:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annico-windhan-energy-renewable-energy-project-5114243.new#new

~
We have seen hundreds of examples, when the team began to defend itself after the accusations, can we just believe to their words? If I launch a scam tomorrow and answer all the accusations - the site was made at an outsourcing, WP too, the fake team is a stock photo from a template for the site and now I’ll fix everything, we’re not scam, but I will not give you any proof. How do you see it? This is of course extremely convenient - you were accused of scam - you will fix everything and there will be no evidence left. In any case, if you are so keen on development, you should have hired an experienced person, it is really difficult to invest money in a project that makes such mistakes, this is not professional, in the current market it is almost impossible to succeed in raising funds, especially after such accusations.

~
Is it worth it to create a topic with quotes from all teams that told tales that team on website was in test mode, but online, although this is absolutely not the case and they are just scam. Another Scam ICO trying to steal people's money. Is there really a school of sample answers to scam accusations somewhere? Because it seems like all scam projects are learning in it