World population is very small. - page 2.

Rizqi

member

Activity: 294

Merit: 10

Freedom

Quote from: Sidiq SP on May 17, 2018, 02:03:23 AM

this is a thorough data in this world, but not for my country indonesia, in my country the population is very big, even because the density of population so to look for land of work only very difficult get, in can be very little and difficult to get it, so the assumption that will get a lot of money it is something very sulut in my country, hopefully this problem is resolved

it is quite true that when an imbalance between human populations on employment lands there will be social inequality, and this is not good in a country when social inequality occurs, and we know that the number of Indonesians is 266,456,180 in 2017 and its growth rate is 1, 10% but the level of prosperity of a region can not be measured from the population of people, there are still many who have not felt the joy of happiness and I am this overall percentage is not an individual,

population statistics : http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/indonesia-population/

janhllr

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Broly46 on May 12, 2018, 02:12:21 PM

I used to think this world has a lot of people. We have only 7.6 billions on planet earth.
But we have a lot of money, 72,000 billions worth of money, we have a lot of data, petabyte is 1,000,000 billions byte? I don’t know what happened to my brain, I just can’t get excited over the number 7.6 billions, I think it is too small. And what is more terrifying is we are not getting more human in the next xx years, we are going to get a lot more money and more data in the next xx years. I don’t think it look healthy at all, what is the purpose of high growth when our population isn’t growing high?

Are you joking? The magnitude of the number is not the "big" thing here. It's the problem around this number of people causing the threats.
There are millions of people aren't fed every year, millions of children dont have enough water to drink, this is all because of the tremendous number of people around the world. Food supply and accommodation here. I think.

Sidiq SP

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 100

this is a thorough data in this world, but not for my country indonesia, in my country the population is very big, even because the density of population so to look for land of work only very difficult get, in can be very little and difficult to get it, so the assumption that will get a lot of money it is something very sulut in my country, hopefully this problem is resolved

SkyFlakes

full member

Activity: 307

Merit: 101

WPP ENERGY - BACKED ASSET GREEN ENERGY TOKEN

I think that the world population isn't very small, it is somehow right at some point. Comparing the world population to money and data isn't a right comparison. Yes there's a lot of money because everything now has an equivalent to money value. There's also a lot of data stored because people stores it. It is not a problem to be talked about. Also, we can see that technology is advancing every minute, so we can came to a point that we can still stored a lot more. Population is a big issue to some and we should more see the problems attached to it than complaining how small it is.

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: morufu2016 on May 15, 2018, 03:41:36 PM

Statistics indicate that most people would rather use these less populated places for a remote vacation while continuing to live in populated countries. Aside from a few countries like the Vatican

LOL... do you know that Vatican is one of the most densely populated countries in the planet? The population density there is close to 2,300 people per square kilometer, which makes Vatican one of the top 10 most densely populated countries in the world.

pademola

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

i don't think the population is small compared to the land mass

cryptothief

member

Activity: 350

Merit: 41

Such a bizarre post, relating the population to the amount of money and concluding that there should be more people because there is more money. Aside from the fact that I don't know where you got these figures from, it is a strange way of looking at it. Surely if the number of people increases at a lower rate when compared to the amount of money, then it means (ignoring the disparities of wealth throughout the world - which I realise is an important distinction) that the average person's wealth is growing, and therefore a positive. Poverty worldwide has been decreasing for a long time now, although there is still a long way to go. This is an interesting article on the decline on world poverty https://singularityhub.com/2018/01/02/will-the-world-ever-be-free-of-extreme-poverty/

Mariksa

newbie

Activity: 322

Merit: 0

As far as I know, it is worse for our world if the population grows. That is because the problem of environmental pollution is growing with the population.
I've also heard that there is a theory called the 'golden billion' or something like that (sorry, I can't remember the name of it correctly). In this theory, it says that the world can't have more than a billion people.

hunterWood

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

What's your IQ OP? Just because you don't think that's a lot of people doesn't make it so.

I remember when we were in the 5 billions and then in the year 2000 it hit 6 billion. Now we'll pushing 8. Unless someone is very young, like 24 and under, they won't realize how fast 15 years go by.

morufu2016

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Statistics indicate that most people would rather use these less populated places for a remote vacation while continuing to live in populated countries. Aside from a few countries like the Vatican

hwiese

newbie

Activity: 98

Merit: 0

I don't think we should worry about Earth's population being too small before we can comfortably support everyone that's already here, and we're still a ways away from doing that. Can you elaborate on how you think more data and more money will negatively effect us in the future? Do you think there won't be enough people to manage it all?

Aqua Man

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Quote from: Broly46 on May 12, 2018, 02:12:21 PM

I used to think this world has a lot of people. We have only 7.6 billions on planet earth.
But we have a lot of money, 72,000 billions worth of money, we have a lot of data, petabyte is 1,000,000 billions byte? I don’t know what happened to my brain, I just can’t get excited over the number 7.6 billions, I think it is too small. And what is more terrifying is we are not getting more human in the next xx years, we are going to get a lot more money and more data in the next xx years. I don’t think it look healthy at all, what is the purpose of high growth when our population isn’t growing high?

I believe if we manage to make more people then we can have more money and more bytes of data which can contain more coins which means more = prosperity. So 7.6 billions times 10 equals 10 times more profit from the coin which allows us to get more bytes eventually. I f we look at the world today 1,000,000billion byte not that much

FlightyPouch

sr. member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 300

It may be a small amount of number when comparing to other things but if you think of it, a lot of specialists are saying that our world is overpopulated and it is just starting.

Datas will be always way more than the population since we are also safe keeping the datas of the past. And our work datas and personal and public datas will always be included in that occupying more data. Don't compare data with population since there is a lot of multiple data in one person meaning most of that datas are the same.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

The surface of the earth has about 126,041,600,000 acres on it.
Of this, about 36,806,400,000 acres are land, and...
... about 89,237,760,000 are water.

Lets give every person on earth 10 acres of land for his very own. This means that there is room for about 3,680,640,000 people on the land. That's over 3 and a half billion.

People are very ingenious. They can figure out many ways to make many levels for people to live on. We do this already. They are called highrise apartments. We can easily support multiples of the above 3.5+ billion.

In addition, there are such things as subterranean floors. We have these already. They are called basements. We can easily support many more multiples of what we have listed above already.

People are very ingenious. They are figuring out ways to live on the surface of the ocean - https://www.seasteading.org/. Once this becomes completely perfected, we have room for countless billions more people to live on, above and below the surface of the oceans, while harvesting an abundance of ocean-grown food.

There won't be even a hint of population problem for 500 years or more into the future.

Current population problems are government greed problems.

Cool

seoincorporation

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 3130

Quote from: Broly46 on May 12, 2018, 02:12:21 PM

I used to think this world has a lot of people. We have only 7.6 billions on planet earth.
But we have a lot of money, 72,000 billions worth of money, we have a lot of data, petabyte is 1,000,000 billions byte? I don’t know what happened to my brain, I just can’t get excited over the number 7.6 billions, I think it is too small. And what is more terrifying is we are not getting more human in the next xx years, we are going to get a lot more money and more data in the next xx years. I don’t think it look healthy at all, what is the purpose of high growth when our population isn’t growing high?

Oh, wow, you must be kidding.
Planet Earth is not only about humankind, there are many species disappearing each day due to the overpopulation. Humans and their economy mean nothing in comparison with the balance of the planet, which is dangerously damaged, once more, due to overpopulation.
Money is a human invention, and, even when earth can give all the humans food, what happens with the other species??

This is called anthropocentrism, man.

Mojo2012

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote

I think the population of the world is okay. It's not small.

Gow can it be "okay"? OK in a way it could be less, or more?

Don't forget, the population numbers are rising. Is this okay too?

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

So the total amount of fiat cash available is around $10,000 per person? ($72 trillion / 7.5 billion). I would say that it is normal. But there is wide disparity between the countries. In the developed nations, this will be close to $100,000 per head, while in the third world this figure will be closer to $1,000 per individual.

Johnyjay

newbie

Activity: 219

Merit: 0

I think the population of the world is okay. It's not small.

Mojo2012

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

The number of population does not directly relate to the amount of welath created.
You are forgetting about the resources needed to creat actual wealth.
Resources are limited and some soin will be depleted on earth.
What then?

In fact I think we should redistribute wealth to the poorer countries in the long run, so they can get up to speed with the western countries. This will result in less wars, less poverty, more wealth for everyone.

To make this happen though, we have to change the way we think. Egoism and greed habe to be replaced by solidarity and the will to make everyones lives better.
You should read marx!

He foretold the current situations. capitalism will destroy itself and a real communism will replace it. Not the way we had in he ussr or china. But more like in startrek. Gene roddenberry had a very clear and concrete vision on how such a world would look like!

Foxpup

legendary

Activity: 4542

Merit: 3393

Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023

Quote from: Broly46 on May 12, 2018, 02:12:21 PM

I don’t think it look healthy at all, what is the purpose of high growth when our population isn’t growing high?

The purpose is that there's more wealth per person than there used to be, thus increasing the wealth and quality of life of each individual person. What you're suggesting boils down to "There isn't enough poverty in the world! We must increase the world population to fix this!" which is a despicable idea and you ought to be punched in the face just for thinking it.

Topic: World population is very small. - page 2. (Read 488 times)