I think it's already there as "cybersecurity failure".
That's also one of those diamonds that looks like it's both too high and too low and should probably be split into finance and other infrastructure.
I'd have enough not in crypto to be able to trade my way up to what I've got over the course of about a year - diversifying isn't just assets, it can be skills too...
Topic: World risk - global - page 4. (Read 543 times)
For those unfamiliarised, this is a risk quadrant depicting the world level risks. How important the risk is is based on how likely is to materialise (likelyhood or frequency) and how bad is it (impact or severity).
For example something that is likely to happen and is disastrous will be on the top right corner. Risks that are unusual but terrible would be top left. In the inforgraphics you can see how climate change is quite likely and has severe consequences whereas weapons of mass destruction are less likely and even just equally as bad.
Now, where would you place the risk of a bitcoin hack o network problem in your finances and in the world finances?
For example something that is likely to happen and is disastrous will be on the top right corner. Risks that are unusual but terrible would be top left. In the inforgraphics you can see how climate change is quite likely and has severe consequences whereas weapons of mass destruction are less likely and even just equally as bad.
Now, where would you place the risk of a bitcoin hack o network problem in your finances and in the world finances?
Jump to: