Pages:
Author

Topic: World War III ? - page 20. (Read 22003 times)

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Entrepreneur
February 17, 2017, 01:02:02 PM
I think World War-III has already begun.

Millions of refugees moving why ?

hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 500
February 17, 2017, 11:30:31 AM
C'mon guys. not more wars.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 501
February 17, 2017, 11:29:27 AM
I've read somewhere that Pakistan get funds from China and other countries to train terrorists and kill people in India it could be wrong though but looking at Pakistan it looks true. Even Pakistan neighboring countries wants to depart from Pakistan. 

Pakistan is the main sponsor of terrorism in India and Afghanistan. China is their major ally, and Chinese investment has helped Pakistan to come up with several major infrastructural projects. But it came at a cost. Pakistan gave away the Trans-Karakoram tract (Shaksgam Valley) to China in exchange for the funds and technological help.

nothing is free. Infrastructural projects funds exchange with Shaksgam Valley. Indonesia is now funded by China for some Infrastructures projects in return China political influence is stronger in Indonesia.;
legendary
Activity: 3332
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
February 17, 2017, 01:51:29 AM
I've read somewhere that Pakistan get funds from China and other countries to train terrorists and kill people in India it could be wrong though but looking at Pakistan it looks true. Even Pakistan neighboring countries wants to depart from Pakistan. 

Pakistan is the main sponsor of terrorism in India and Afghanistan. China is their major ally, and Chinese investment has helped Pakistan to come up with several major infrastructural projects. But it came at a cost. Pakistan gave away the Trans-Karakoram tract (Shaksgam Valley) to China in exchange for the funds and technological help.
sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
February 16, 2017, 02:18:54 PM
Maybe World War III is near because countries are grouped in two parts not good for people though. It'll start with America, China or Russia who knows?
Countries always grouped together. It does not mean preparation for war. That says more about the economic wars, but they are always. Politics is certainly there but the fighting is not conducted. In Syria there is a war for the monopoly of Russia in the European market.

Recently India and Pakistan threaten each other to declare war both are nuclear powered nation some countries supported Pakistan and some favored India. 
India is constantly at war with Pakistan. It is the presence on both sides of nuclear weapons does not allow them to use it. I do not believe that anyone ever dare to use nuclear weapons. It is a horror that can only frighten.

I've read somewhere that Pakistan get funds from China and other countries to train terrorists and kill people in India it could be wrong though but looking at Pakistan it looks true. Even Pakistan neighboring countries wants to depart from Pakistan. 
Pakistan is a country with a weak economy and policy of the state is earning money on the war and the training of terrorists. Golden time for them were active hostilities in Afghanistan. Now the conflict has subsided and they switched to India.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 251
February 16, 2017, 02:05:25 PM
Maybe World War III is near because countries are grouped in two parts not good for people though. It'll start with America, China or Russia who knows?
Countries always grouped together. It does not mean preparation for war. That says more about the economic wars, but they are always. Politics is certainly there but the fighting is not conducted. In Syria there is a war for the monopoly of Russia in the European market.

Recently India and Pakistan threaten each other to declare war both are nuclear powered nation some countries supported Pakistan and some favored India. 
India is constantly at war with Pakistan. It is the presence on both sides of nuclear weapons does not allow them to use it. I do not believe that anyone ever dare to use nuclear weapons. It is a horror that can only frighten.

I've read somewhere that Pakistan get funds from China and other countries to train terrorists and kill people in India it could be wrong though but looking at Pakistan it looks true. Even Pakistan neighboring countries wants to depart from Pakistan. 
sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
February 16, 2017, 02:00:27 PM
Maybe World War III is near because countries are grouped in two parts not good for people though. It'll start with America, China or Russia who knows?
Countries always grouped together. It does not mean preparation for war. That says more about the economic wars, but they are always. Politics is certainly there but the fighting is not conducted. In Syria there is a war for the monopoly of Russia in the European market.

Recently India and Pakistan threaten each other to declare war both are nuclear powered nation some countries supported Pakistan and some favored India. 
India is constantly at war with Pakistan. It is the presence on both sides of nuclear weapons does not allow them to use it. I do not believe that anyone ever dare to use nuclear weapons. It is a horror that can only frighten.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 251
February 16, 2017, 01:48:05 PM
Maybe World War III is near because countries are grouped in two parts not good for people though. It'll start with America, China or Russia who knows?
Countries always grouped together. It does not mean preparation for war. That says more about the economic wars, but they are always. Politics is certainly there but the fighting is not conducted. In Syria there is a war for the monopoly of Russia in the European market.

Recently India and Pakistan threaten each other to declare war both are nuclear powered nation some countries supported Pakistan and some favored India. 
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
February 16, 2017, 01:42:31 PM
Maybe World War III is near because countries are grouped in two parts not good for people though. It'll start with America, China or Russia who knows?
Countries always grouped together. It does not mean preparation for war. That says more about the economic wars, but they are always. Politics is certainly there but the fighting is not conducted. In Syria there is a war for the monopoly of Russia in the European market.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 251
February 16, 2017, 01:37:44 PM
Maybe World War III is near because countries are grouped in two parts not good for people though. It'll start with America, China or Russia who knows?
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
February 16, 2017, 01:32:59 PM
World War III will happen for petroleum products sure it will start with israel.
It is already underway and it started with Syria. There really is a war for the ability to deliver oil and gas to Europe. Russia is not profitable so they unleashed a war there. Unfortunately Syria is doomed to destruction in favor of Russian.
full member
Activity: 215
Merit: 103
February 16, 2017, 01:27:18 PM
World War III will happen for petroleum products sure it will start with israel.
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
February 16, 2017, 10:51:22 AM

Not all so sad. Really if you start a third world war using nuclear weapons it really is in danger of Apocalypse. But the war can be without the use of nuclear weapons. Such a war already underway in Syria and yet the world did not end.

Yes, but it is just matter of time when would some country use nuclear weapon that they have. You see, someone would need to lose war, and none country want that. So when they understand they are near defeat, they would use there nuclear weapon and other side would use too... so there you go Cheesy . Nuclear war how ever you turn it.
I think that now manifests a characteristic feature of the new strategy wars. They occur on the territory of third countries. Even if one of the parties is defeated, it won't be her due to the territorial losses and therefore no reason for the use of nuclear weapons.
Ok when you see it that way, it is truth... unless that other, that third countrie possess nuclear weapon. In that case your theory doesnt apply. Or maybe that third country is in alliance with some other country that have nuclear weapon, and in that case that other country could use it...
If a country has nuclear weapons it openly on her one will not attack. Against such countries is economic war, and sooner or later it will destroy the country from within. Not be targets for nuclear bombing. For example Iran and North Korea.

I think that most of countries in the world could withstand economic war. If done right, country doesnt need to sell there products to other countries. Thay could make there own food and day to day things that is basic for human survival. And if done right that could last forever. And i dont need to say that there will always be countries that will deal with that country so there will never be full economic war, so that all countries wont trade with that country.
No it is a utopia. In the modern world it is impossible to live offline. Try to make a stock and try to live in a sealed bunker. How much you have enough? The country is even harder and some products of vital activity of the country is not limited. Very greatly influenced by technology.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 257
February 16, 2017, 10:09:49 AM

Not all so sad. Really if you start a third world war using nuclear weapons it really is in danger of Apocalypse. But the war can be without the use of nuclear weapons. Such a war already underway in Syria and yet the world did not end.

Yes, but it is just matter of time when would some country use nuclear weapon that they have. You see, someone would need to lose war, and none country want that. So when they understand they are near defeat, they would use there nuclear weapon and other side would use too... so there you go Cheesy . Nuclear war how ever you turn it.
I think that now manifests a characteristic feature of the new strategy wars. They occur on the territory of third countries. Even if one of the parties is defeated, it won't be her due to the territorial losses and therefore no reason for the use of nuclear weapons.
Ok when you see it that way, it is truth... unless that other, that third countrie possess nuclear weapon. In that case your theory doesnt apply. Or maybe that third country is in alliance with some other country that have nuclear weapon, and in that case that other country could use it...
If a country has nuclear weapons it openly on her one will not attack. Against such countries is economic war, and sooner or later it will destroy the country from within. Not be targets for nuclear bombing. For example Iran and North Korea.

I think that most of countries in the world could withstand economic war. If done right, country doesnt need to sell there products to other countries. Thay could make there own food and day to day things that is basic for human survival. And if done right that could last forever. And i dont need to say that there will always be countries that will deal with that country so there will never be full economic war, so that all countries wont trade with that country.
full member
Activity: 206
Merit: 100
February 16, 2017, 10:07:41 AM
The council on foreign relations report indicates that a mass casualty terrorist attack on U.S. soil, as well as the intensifying violence between Turkey and Kurdish forces and other potential major conflicts could cause lasting impacts throughout this year. Anything Is possible.

I'm sure that until Syria does not leave Russia, the conflict in this country will not stop. Syria is the new Afghanistan for Russia and several other countries. I think that he will last more than one year. If anything happens with Assad, he may flare up with new force.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 265
February 16, 2017, 09:58:54 AM
The council on foreign relations report indicates that a mass casualty terrorist attack on U.S. soil, as well as the intensifying violence between Turkey and Kurdish forces and other potential major conflicts could cause lasting impacts throughout this year. Anything Is possible.
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
February 16, 2017, 09:58:40 AM

Not all so sad. Really if you start a third world war using nuclear weapons it really is in danger of Apocalypse. But the war can be without the use of nuclear weapons. Such a war already underway in Syria and yet the world did not end.

Yes, but it is just matter of time when would some country use nuclear weapon that they have. You see, someone would need to lose war, and none country want that. So when they understand they are near defeat, they would use there nuclear weapon and other side would use too... so there you go Cheesy . Nuclear war how ever you turn it.
I think that now manifests a characteristic feature of the new strategy wars. They occur on the territory of third countries. Even if one of the parties is defeated, it won't be her due to the territorial losses and therefore no reason for the use of nuclear weapons.
Ok when you see it that way, it is truth... unless that other, that third countrie possess nuclear weapon. In that case your theory doesnt apply. Or maybe that third country is in alliance with some other country that have nuclear weapon, and in that case that other country could use it...
If a country has nuclear weapons it openly on her one will not attack. Against such countries is economic war, and sooner or later it will destroy the country from within. Not be targets for nuclear bombing. For example Iran and North Korea.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 257
February 16, 2017, 09:50:25 AM

Not all so sad. Really if you start a third world war using nuclear weapons it really is in danger of Apocalypse. But the war can be without the use of nuclear weapons. Such a war already underway in Syria and yet the world did not end.

Yes, but it is just matter of time when would some country use nuclear weapon that they have. You see, someone would need to lose war, and none country want that. So when they understand they are near defeat, they would use there nuclear weapon and other side would use too... so there you go Cheesy . Nuclear war how ever you turn it.
I think that now manifests a characteristic feature of the new strategy wars. They occur on the territory of third countries. Even if one of the parties is defeated, it won't be her due to the territorial losses and therefore no reason for the use of nuclear weapons.
Ok when you see it that way, it is truth... unless that other, that third countrie possess nuclear weapon. In that case your theory doesnt apply. Or maybe that third country is in alliance with some other country that have nuclear weapon, and in that case that other country could use it...
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
February 16, 2017, 09:43:28 AM

Not all so sad. Really if you start a third world war using nuclear weapons it really is in danger of Apocalypse. But the war can be without the use of nuclear weapons. Such a war already underway in Syria and yet the world did not end.

Yes, but it is just matter of time when would some country use nuclear weapon that they have. You see, someone would need to lose war, and none country want that. So when they understand they are near defeat, they would use there nuclear weapon and other side would use too... so there you go Cheesy . Nuclear war how ever you turn it.
I think that now manifests a characteristic feature of the new strategy wars. They occur on the territory of third countries. Even if one of the parties is defeated, it won't be her due to the territorial losses and therefore no reason for the use of nuclear weapons.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 257
February 16, 2017, 09:35:42 AM
#99

Not all so sad. Really if you start a third world war using nuclear weapons it really is in danger of Apocalypse. But the war can be without the use of nuclear weapons. Such a war already underway in Syria and yet the world did not end.

Yes, but it is just matter of time when would some country use nuclear weapon that they have. You see, someone would need to lose war, and none country want that. So when they understand they are near defeat, they would use there nuclear weapon and other side would use too... so there you go Cheesy . Nuclear war how ever you turn it.
Pages:
Jump to: