What a challange for all miners... But what about the 51% attack question?
I guess Bitmain just wants to venture in other things beyond Bitcoin and they do very well. Using renewable energies is also very good. I wonder if they can run miners cheaper than, say, HaoBTC.
Also, this thread should probably be on mining since it talks about something that is designed to (also) be a mining facility
I was going to ask the exact same question after posting this , I checked the comments on the blog post I gave the link to above and here is what It says :
I'm not sure If I got this right but If they did they would have between 51% & 75% haspower , wouldn't that screw us all ?
So I guess this is the same facility that came in the news around here a while ago. I remember seeing in the thread that they would have around 60% hashrate using their peak power. I'll link that if I find it again.
Yes, that would "screw us all", it would definitely be bad for Bitcoin. But they can't fill the facility with miners in a "timely manner" for them to be a danger to the network stability. High number of miners have to be deployed strategically and a few at a time. I'm not even sure if there's software that can handle all those miners in one single facility in an easy to maintain way. It's not feasible for them to have in something like a months time enough hashrate on that facility for them to be a danger to the network. Secondly, the facility won't exclusively serve Bitcoin or cryptocurrency mining. So I don't think this poses any danger to network stability.