Topic: wot if blockchain got to 100 terabit wot then - page 2. (Read 1706 times)
People using “wot” make me automatically assume they are being sarcastic.
how will it be possible with a permanent record and with more adoption its going to be huge how will wallets be used then how would u host it wot if it gets to 1 yotabit
seagate is coming out with the 500 terrabyte hybrid drive soon. and 1Tb nic cards too .... stop worrying .
wot
by the time something like that happen, our storage will be much larger, 100 tera would be the standard
just buy a bigger storage, no need to worry about this
just buy a bigger storage, no need to worry about this
how will it be possible with a permanent record and with more adoption its going to be huge how will wallets be used then how would u host it wot if it gets to 1 yotabit
We would be able to transfer 100 "terabit" or whatever your asking in the future. Your thinking about this linearly, data storage grows exponentially.
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Quote
A block header with no transactions would be about 80 bytes. If we suppose blocks are
generated every 10 minutes, 80 bytes * 6 * 24 * 365 = 4.2MB per year. With computer systems
typically selling with 2GB of RAM as of 2008, and Moore's Law predicting current growth of
1.2GB per year, storage should not be a problem even if the block headers must be kept in
memory
generated every 10 minutes, 80 bytes * 6 * 24 * 365 = 4.2MB per year. With computer systems
typically selling with 2GB of RAM as of 2008, and Moore's Law predicting current growth of
1.2GB per year, storage should not be a problem even if the block headers must be kept in
memory
100 Terabyte sized ledger would be many many many years from now. By that time it should still be relatively easy to store and transfer the ledger.
how will it be possible with a permanent record and with more adoption its going to be huge how will wallets be used then how would u host it wot if it gets to 1 yotabit
Jump to: