Now I’m not all that solid on the technical aspects of Bitcoin and the Bitcoin network but, the little I’ve been on the technical discussion board made me to understand that, having more than one nodes on the network adds a lot more credibility on the network and makes it impossible for anyone to double spend.
Hashrate which is more about the computation power wouldn’t work so well as regards speed and efficiency if all users have one. It kind of increases the difficulty from the way I view it as, it reduces the speed at which, Bitcoin would be mined in the sense that, miners are limited to just 1 for computational power when you could have more.
Topic: Would bitcoin be better if all users had the same hashrate? If all users were 1 - page 2. (Read 120 times)
January 12, 2025, 05:37:43 PM
January 12, 2025, 05:32:36 PM
Of course it would be better.
You guys are just idiots that will watch your great great grandchildren kill eachother
Enjoy your temporal greed and btw, you bald because of greed. I have a full lion mane and always will because I do not have my head up my a$$.
The mark of the beast is on the forehead, that is why you bald there. Beast Coin out.
You guys are just idiots that will watch your great great grandchildren kill eachother
Enjoy your temporal greed and btw, you bald because of greed. I have a full lion mane and always will because I do not have my head up my a$$.
The mark of the beast is on the forehead, that is why you bald there. Beast Coin out.
January 12, 2025, 05:27:17 PM
Would bitcoin be better if all users had the same hashrate? Do not the rich just get richer with this system we have? and eventually 1 person will win.
If all users were 1 vote on the network? (direct digital democracy)
I think if we all had the same hashrate it would be more fair.
The supply is 98% premined to anyone born today, why do they not get to mine?
In 2142 it will all be mined and kids then wont even be able to mine, but 98% premine today? WTF? is it ETH?
I think it would be better if we were all 1 node on the network, rather a few guys or even 1 guy being able to be 50% of the nodes.
This can be done using passive sonar to scan WILLING users heartbeats.
I think it would be better with a built in school system in a wallet that gives credits for people do courses and paying people like gov jobs that they finish, like real life bounties.
I know my idea is so 2200, but bitcoin is not it boys, the central bankers can buy all the supply, you are still $laves.
If all users were 1 vote on the network? (direct digital democracy)
I think if we all had the same hashrate it would be more fair.
The supply is 98% premined to anyone born today, why do they not get to mine?
In 2142 it will all be mined and kids then wont even be able to mine, but 98% premine today? WTF? is it ETH?
I think it would be better if we were all 1 node on the network, rather a few guys or even 1 guy being able to be 50% of the nodes.
This can be done using passive sonar to scan WILLING users heartbeats.
I think it would be better with a built in school system in a wallet that gives credits for people do courses and paying people like gov jobs that they finish, like real life bounties.
I know my idea is so 2200, but bitcoin is not it boys, the central bankers can buy all the supply, you are still $laves.
Jump to: