Topic: Would you play this game? - page 3. (Read 4079 times)
Not really. Rather play a simple dice game then that. Doesn't seem interesting at all.
House edge is 1% right 
?
But, how can the system decide the light ?
The reality yellow light only for few second while red is on few times than green.
So, did you decide the color by provably fair ?
Not interesting at all
?But, how can the system decide the light ?
The reality yellow light only for few second while red is on few times than green.
So, did you decide the color by provably fair ?
Not interesting at all
The game is to guess which light will turn on at traffic lights with possibility to get your bet x 2.97?
chance of getting all correct would be (1/3)*3 so more like bet x 27 minus house edge. i wouldn't play this game.
Is very very simple, no thanks
nope, never , it can be rigged very easy
You can say that there are 30,000 numbers:
Maybe green means 0-10,000, yellow 10,001-20,000 and red 20,001-30,000.
You choose your light ("number range") and play the game. With a provably fair algorithm the game would be fair.
That would be fair, but according to the OP, it seems like in order to win you have to guess all the lights correctly.
No, you have to choose the light which will turn on, or?
You have to choose light which will turn on.
nope, never , it can be rigged very easy
You can say that there are 30,000 numbers:
Maybe green means 0-10,000, yellow 10,001-20,000 and red 20,001-30,000.
You choose your light ("number range") and play the game. With a provably fair algorithm the game would be fair.
That would be fair, but according to the OP, it seems like in order to win you have to guess all the lights correctly.
No, you have to choose the light which will turn on, or?
nope, never , it can be rigged very easy
You can say that there are 30,000 numbers:
Maybe green means 0-10,000, yellow 10,001-20,000 and red 20,001-30,000.
You choose your light ("number range") and play the game. With a provably fair algorithm the game would be fair.
That would be fair, but according to the OP, it seems like in order to win you have to guess all the lights correctly.
nope, never , it can be rigged very easy
You can say that there are 30,000 numbers:
Maybe green means 0-10,000, yellow 10,001-20,000 and red 20,001-30,000.
You choose your light ("number range") and play the game. With a provably fair algorithm the game would be fair.
That would be fair, but according to the OP, it seems like in order to win you have to guess all the lights correctly.
nope, never , it can be rigged very easy
You can say that there are 30,000 numbers:
Maybe green means 0-10,000, yellow 10,001-20,000 and red 20,001-30,000.
You choose your light ("number range") and play the game. With a provably fair algorithm the game would be fair.
nope, never , it can be rigged very easy
Maybe something like simon says color or what the hell the name is it the one you have to remember the colors of that toy... like... you challenge another player to remember the colors and who gets most wins the pot?
What is this game by the way?
All I see are traffic lights.
All I see are traffic lights.
Gambling is actually always the same, at least at the Bitcoin casinos. Either landmines or the classical dice.
Thats the same like betting 3x on dice. Why would anyone play this?
Not really, if that's just the concept design then it might.
But overall there's chance of it able for it to be rigged. Would it be provably fair?
But overall there's chance of it able for it to be rigged. Would it be provably fair?
I'm going to play this if i'm rich and bored but atm nope and not interested
It'd look better if the graphics were better, and you'd be able to get some customers, but doubtfully very many
It is like slot games, but without the fancy graphics and sounds of slots games.
So I guess your idea needs some improvements, I guess
So I guess your idea needs some improvements, I guess
Not very interesting to be honest. Sorry mate, but unlikely to play this.
look like an idiot idea, can u tell to me what is this.
Jump to: