2
you don't need money if everyone in the world is your friend.
Topic: Would you rather? (Read 1892 times)
1. You can buy friends, just as you can buy women.
But really, neither. I like the way things are: no money and no friends
But really, neither. I like the way things are: no money and no friends
depends on what forever alone means, if it means never meeting any people and living alone in the woods with a pile of cash, than rather broke, if it means never married/in a relationship but I can still have pals and hookers, than #1
#1. Hookers and Blow.
I will rather have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to my name...because i feel that money can never buy true friendship...
i love my friends n i don't need anything else if they r wid me...
i love my friends n i don't need anything else if they r wid me...
Would you rather have all the money in the world, but live forever alone
or
Have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to your name
or
Have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to your name
is there a reason i don't have a single dollar in my name? mental handicap?
wait if you have all the money in the world then money would be useless
because if you spend any money you would get it back so society would rule money as useless and they would move on
. . . or completely loose their minds and riot.
because if you spend any money you would get it back so society would rule money as useless and they would move on
. . . or completely loose their minds and riot.
All the money in the world at least I have no friends with style.
As long as I get to keep 1 friend and my wife, option 1. If not, option 2.
I think option 1 is your alone meaning no friend or wife. lol.
Forever alone but have money = spend money on bitches.
Sadly, I wouldn't give up my wife and my friends for all the money in the world. I'll choose option 2 then
Oh this is an economics brain teaser isn't it?
If you have all the money in the world then by the theory of economic velocity it would be worth nothing, thus it would be quite a paradox to have all the "money" in the world, because it would be rather worthless.
However, if you had all the friends in the world, then you wouldn't need money, because your friendship with every human being on the planet could be a dividend you could draw on the rest of your life.
For instance, if you had friends with yachts, houses, spare cars, you could utilize all these things in exchange for your friendship. Ownership therefore would be rendered pointless because you would have no wants or needs, because the rest of the world has free flowing capital (because you chose option 2, therefore the world economy gets to continue, and you could be friends with any and all of them, raising your quality of life) you are able to prosper as well.
What do I win?
If you have all the money in the world then by the theory of economic velocity it would be worth nothing, thus it would be quite a paradox to have all the "money" in the world, because it would be rather worthless.
However, if you had all the friends in the world, then you wouldn't need money, because your friendship with every human being on the planet could be a dividend you could draw on the rest of your life.
For instance, if you had friends with yachts, houses, spare cars, you could utilize all these things in exchange for your friendship. Ownership therefore would be rendered pointless because you would have no wants or needs, because the rest of the world has free flowing capital (because you chose option 2, therefore the world economy gets to continue, and you could be friends with any and all of them, raising your quality of life) you are able to prosper as well.
What do I win?
Money's a means to living a better life. It shouldn't take precedence over living a good life. What's the value of money when there are no friends to enjoy life with?
Would you rather have all the money in the world, but live forever alone
or
Have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to your name
or
Have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to your name
That makes sense.
Rich people never have friends. Because their "friends" are fake and toxic. I've know my share of toxic garbage. Just cut them out of your life and never see them again. They are parasites. Who needs that? They'll eventually self-destruct when there's no host to leech off. Focus on your family. Wife/GF. Bothers. Sisters. Mothers. Fathers. Uncles. Aunts. Cousins. And the old fellas. Family above all. They are in it for your best interest. Never deal with anyone without contracts and lawyers present. Document EVERYTHING. And remain mysterious. They are just an acquaintance. Not your friends.
Rich or poor they all deserve the same respect. All are equal. When you deflate your ego and emphasize, rich or poor, the world will love you. That's charisma I guess. Some have it, some don't. You know it when you see it.
Having to choose between those two options is silly. Who says you can't have both?
When you have enough money to live comfortably for the rest of your life, it's time to prioritize. Just don't get addicted to anything. That sure can take you off course. Need 100% focus.
Life's a test, don't fail it.
Would you rather have all the money in the world, but live forever alone
or
Have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to your name
or
Have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to your name
I choose money
i can buy friends with my money
:peace:
You can certainly buy their company, for a time, but they'll never be your friends; at least not in any meaningful sense of the word friend. They're there just so they can get at your money, and once that ends, so does their interest in you.
Would you rather have all the money in the world, but live forever alone
or
Have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to your name
or
Have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to your name
I choose money
i can buy friends with my money
:peace:
If someone have a lot of money......he is never alone
It's funny I feel like you can pick either option and still so the "right" thing if that's what you're after. Like the guy above said that's a good answer, take the money and spend it to help others. Or don't worry about money and you'll have friends and always be there for them,totally selfless.
i would rather to be rich to buy all the necessity in the world and share it to the people who are in need.
As long as I get to keep 1 friend and my wife, option 1. If not, option 2.
I think option 1 is your alone meaning no friend or wife. lol.
Forever alone but have money = spend money on bitches.
Would you rather have all the money in the world, but live forever alone
or
Have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to your name
or
Have all the friends in the world but never have a single dollar to your name
This question is unanswerable. If you had all the friends possible om the world, or seven billion people, out of those seven billion would at least have some type of wealth. And having all of the money in the world and living forever alone is different. You can still 'achieve' friendship with somebody.
I choose i would rather have all the money in the world. Money can buy friends now a days. We can't say that I will live alone in my old days I can pay for nurses to take care of me.
Jump to: