Would you tag these users? - page 2.

borovichok

hero member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 518

Quote from: FatFork on January 12, 2024, 08:27:54 AM

Quote from: borovichok on January 12, 2024, 07:02:49 AM

I didn't know changing old staked wallet address was a red tag offence, didn't read it anywhere.

You weren't tagged for changing your staked wallet address. You were tagged for excessive shitposting and spamming the forum with low-quality, AI-generated content.

Where is the AI-generated content? It's been days and no one has come out yet, and the mentioned post JollyGood tagged me for is 100% human, so I think that's why he hasn't come out yet.

You're on DT, and you think like this? If you think my posts aren't good enough, report them to a moderator, and if I'm found guilty of spamming and shitposting, I get a temp or parmban according to the rules; it's not a red tag violation. It DT abuse.

Shishir99

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 374

Quote from: FatFork on January 12, 2024, 08:27:54 AM

You weren't tagged for changing your staked wallet address. You were tagged for excessive shitposting and spamming the forum with low-quality, AI-generated content.

I guess you have missed what this user offered. He said that his posts are not AI-generated. JollyGood didn't gather any evidence before he tagged that user. We have seen many false positive reports when we check AI content. Everyone should have their investigation before they conclude. The user refuses the allegation. Now, if you have evidence of AI posting, show them. I have checked the post-JollyGood used as a reference and it's a human text.

The main argument is, can you leave negative feedback for shitposting or AI-generated content? You shouldn't do it. If you see a shitpost, report it to the moderator and they will handle it. Leaving negative for shitposting or AI content isn't the proper use of the feedback system.

Now I could see JollyGood's typical behavior. If he has nothing in his defense, he silently watches the discussion. Seems like he doesn't give it a fuck. It's like, I did what I did. If you can do something, go on. I wasn't expecting that from you, my friend.

FatFork

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 2581

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: borovichok on January 12, 2024, 07:02:49 AM

I didn't know changing old staked wallet address was a red tag offence, didn't read it anywhere.

You weren't tagged for changing your staked wallet address. You were tagged for excessive shitposting and spamming the forum with low-quality, AI-generated content.

borovichok

hero member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 518

Quote from: LoyceV on January 12, 2024, 04:44:22 AM

Quote from: ineedhelpplease on January 12, 2024, 03:13:59 AM

why in the world did he go through years of borovichok's posts to see that the account potentially switched hands from that stake your address thread. Is there some sort of simpler tool designed for this

You're looking for ninjastic.space/addresses?author=borovichok.

I didn't know changing old staked wallet address was a red tag offence, didn't read it anywhere.

M first ever staked wallet address

Code:

1jJLycZNJZc6eE79c8qpo3dmwaPH6DJd1

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: ineedhelpplease on January 12, 2024, 03:13:59 AM

why in the world did he go through years of borovichok's posts to see that the account potentially switched hands from that stake your address thread. Is there some sort of simpler tool designed for this

You're looking for ninjastic.space/addresses?author=borovichok.

ineedhelpplease

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 13

The only thing I've been wondering about is why in the world did he go through years of borovichok's posts to see that the account potentially switched hands from that stake your address thread. Is there some sort of simpler tool designed for this or did he manually go through his posts (I would feel tired going through all that and i'm sure many people would too) to find his point of inactivity and see that he updated his address.

jvannameIsFraud

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: decodx on January 10, 2024, 01:59:21 PM

You are a f@#$ing piece of s@#$. DO YOU EXPECT ME TO BE F@#$ING NICE WITH YOU WHEN YOU ARE OVER HERE CALLING CIRCCASH A S@#$COIN? NO. I WILL NOT BE NICE TO YOU YOU FOOL!

LOLOLOLOL, go read shitcoiin means

https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/glossary/shitcoin
What Is a Shitcoin?

A shitcoin is a cryptocurrency with zero or close to zero value and no utility. The term shitcoin is used in a pejorative way to refer to altcoins that try to gain benefit from the success of other cryptocurrencies without offering value on their own.

digaran

copper member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 899

🖤😏

No honey, he won't try to improve himself, the only way to get rid of him is to get rid of the people paying him to shitpost around here. 😉

Shishir99

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 374

Quote from: Igebotz on January 10, 2024, 06:21:58 PM

Has JollyGood reacted to this thread? I'll send him a PM with a link. He should understand what is going on here. He has in the past revised some of his feedback, and this could be another.

No. He hasn't reacted in this thread. But I have a feeling that he has seen this thread and monitoring it closely because he is pretty much active on this board. I have noting against him but he seems like dancing around and spreading negative feedback left and right. LOL. I am wondering where I have seen these words and didn't even realize that I started to use it. I had disagreement with BitcoinGirl.Club because of JollyGood. 70% of his feedbacks are correct and it helps the forum. But the rest 30% is like it's his personal note book and best usage of incorrect feedback. I hope he will try to improve himself.

Igebotz

staff

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1610

The Naija & BSFL Sherrif 📛

Has JollyGood reacted to this thread? I'll send him a PM with a link. He should understand what is going on here. He has in the past revised some of his feedback, and this could be another.

borovichok

hero member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 518

Quote from: decodx on January 10, 2024, 01:59:21 PM

Quote from: borovichok on January 10, 2024, 10:46:58 AM

Bad posting is a process and not an habit <...>

Well, I'm not sure I'd agree with that. You've been pumping out posts like crazy since signing up for that money-making campaign. You started off with a modest 30+ posts a week, but before long you raced up to 100+ a week - all to get the biggest payout possible. Its not a hobby now; it's a deliberate effort, a desperate try to make max money from your account.

You believe whatever you want to believe but that's not my problem, we are deviating from the main point, I got an inappropriate red tag for using AI ( according to Jolly) and it almost 48hrs and no single evidence to back up his claims. This is wrong use of the system. I've not committed any scam here or defrauded anyone. I want him to reconsider his tag, it's the right thing to do.

decodx

hero member

Activity: 1414

Merit: 915

🇺🇦 Glory to Ukraine!

Quote from: borovichok on January 10, 2024, 10:46:58 AM

Bad posting is a process and not an habit <...>

Well, I'm not sure I'd agree with that. You've been pumping out posts like crazy since signing up for that money-making campaign. You started off with a modest 30+ posts a week, but before long you raced up to 100+ a week - all to get the biggest payout possible. Its not a hobby now; it's a deliberate effort, a desperate try to make max money from your account.

source: https://ninjastic.space/user/borovichok

And I'm sorry to say, I scrolled through a couple of pages of your recent posts, and they're all nothing but low-quality drivel. It's not about bad English or grammar - it is the lack of substance, the generic rambling that doesn't contribute anything.

Quote from: Shishir99 on January 10, 2024, 11:19:29 AM

Quote from: decodx on January 09, 2024, 03:29:36 PM

But when it comes to this jvanname guy and all that "trading-related matters", I do think he's too risky to deal with. His behavior within the community has been consistently antagonistic and disrespectful, and I believe that it justifies a negative trust rating. Would you personally engage in a trade with him, knowing his history of hostile interactions with other forum members?

Probably I wouldn't deal with that stupid troll. I guess nobody would do any deal with this guy if they saw his post history. But this guy did not offer any service which could be the reason for that tag. I agree with what you have said except the guy deserves the negative feedback. If he had offered any service and behave like this, I would say ignore that troll and go on.

That troll is the owner (or developer) of a crypto project - Circcash. He actively promotes his services to the community, and any stakeholder of that shitcoin, whether an investor or miner, is indirectly in a financial relationship with him. Moreover, he has made direct requests for financial contributions for his services in multiple posts:

Quote from: jvanname on December 23, 2023, 08:30:15 AM

I am not going to do anything for you until you pay me because you are stupid. And this is not a scam because you have requested my services before I told you that my services are not free. Pay me at https://github.com/sponsors/jvanname because I am not going to do anything for you otherwise.

BitcoinGirl.Club

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 2645

Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o

Quote from: LoyceMobile on January 10, 2024, 10:05:47 AM

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on January 10, 2024, 09:55:51 AM

The shit-posting crossed so much that Switzerland got angry LOL.

I didn't get angry, I got even Tongue

To answer your question: I wouldn't leave negative for shitposting or buying an account.

The result for this specific user is shit-posting. Let's see what you and other think about the following posts.

Example response to topic: My 10 Year ( and some days) Bitcointalk Anniversary

Quote from: JollyGood on December 12, 2023, 08:49:58 AM

Signing your posts with Ph.DD is simply pure gold and clearly rattled the OP Grin

Well, now that his so-called superior intellect has been challenged by your Ph.DD I guess he literally does not know what to do or where to turn when confronted with your own DD intellect.

On a serious note, it is very sad to see the way he has been pretending to be a member of a university staff with the sole intention of misusing his name (probably out of spite/revenge).

Response number 81 to Vod
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63468017

Example response to topic: Should Ratimov aka Symmetrick be in DT1?

Quote from: JollyGood on January 06, 2024, 04:59:46 PM

BEWARE: "JollyGood" cannot be trusted. There are serious accusations of this account using AI to post and constantly shit-posting, backscratching. I will remove the feedback if further information is presented.

Shishir99

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 374

Quote from: decodx on January 09, 2024, 03:29:36 PM

But when it comes to this jvanname guy and all that "trading-related matters", I do think he's too risky to deal with. His behavior within the community has been consistently antagonistic and disrespectful, and I believe that it justifies a negative trust rating. Would you personally engage in a trade with him, knowing his history of hostile interactions with other forum members?

Probably I wouldn't deal with that stupid troll. I guess nobody would do any deal with this guy if they saw his post history. But this guy did not offer any service which could be the reason for that tag. I agree with what you have said except the guy deserves the negative feedback. If he had offered any service and behave like this, I would say ignore that troll and go on.

Quote from: borovichok on January 10, 2024, 10:46:58 AM

Bad posting is a process and not an habit but it's good to know that I'm wearing an inappropriate tag and the person who left it hasn't said anything yet in his defense. (Left him multiple messages)

When I came back to the forum the first security step I took was signing a message from my 2017 oldstaked BTC address ( compromised )to a new one , I still have my original email, haven't changed it yet.

Ps: I've left Stake so LoyceV doesn't see my posts to something else.

You are supposed to create a thread in the reputation board and ask other DT members to justify the tag he left. Either he should backup his feedback with a proper evidence, or he should remove the feedback. If he do not respond, people should start excluding him.

borovichok

hero member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 518

Quote from: LoyceMobile on January 10, 2024, 10:05:47 AM

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on January 10, 2024, 09:55:51 AM

The shit-posting crossed so much that Switzerland got angry LOL.

I didn't get angry, I got even Tongue

To answer your question: I wouldn't leave negative for shitposting or buying an account.

Bad posting is a process and not an habit but it's good to know that I'm wearing an inappropriate tag and the person who left it hasn't said anything yet in his defense. (Left him multiple messages)

When I came back to the forum the first security step I took was signing a message from my 2017 oldstaked BTC address ( compromised )to a new one , I still have my original email, haven't changed it yet.

Ps: I've left Stake so LoyceV doesn't see my posts to something else.

LoyceMobile

hero member

Activity: 1643

Merit: 683

LoyceV on the road. Or couch.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on January 10, 2024, 09:55:51 AM

The shit-posting crossed so much that Switzerland got angry LOL.

I didn't get angry, I got even Tongue

To answer your question: I wouldn't leave negative for shitposting or buying an account.

BitcoinGirl.Club

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 2645

Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o

Quote from: nutildah on January 10, 2024, 05:10:45 AM

So as not to clutter Loyce's thread,

I was reading LoyceV's reply on his self-moderated topic [1], [2]. The shit-posting crossed so much that Switzerland got angry LOL.

But good to read at the some point that we all agree, none of it deserves a red tag.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 7892

So as not to clutter Loyce's thread, I'm transferring the conversation here:

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Hueristic on January 09, 2024, 11:29:03 PM

I will consider changing it from "Looks to me like this account is using AI to write posts " to "This account posts are of low quality", how does that sound?

English might be poor but the posts ain't - I don't deserve any of the tag. You can put me on your watchlist and see how things turns out henceforth. The forum is currently offering a second chance, I believe everyone deserves it.

I disagree... Your posts are pretty bad. For example, I just flipped to a random page of your posts and found this one:

Quote from: borovichok on December 16, 2023, 04:47:20 PM

Opportunities are open daily in the market, it's our main objective to strive harder and earn quite significant profits and also sets our good strategies in trading to keep portraying news and ourselves in earning quite significant trophies and points in the market. We have intentions of raising our feets above our shoulders in the market, it's never an easy job to be on triggering trades. Fraudsters will not back down, they have this winning mentality of steady persuasion of their clients who happens to be the real trader's and investors.

Like... what??

Quote from: ?? on ??

I don't deserve any of the tag.

A neutral tag is warranted. However, a red tag is not. It is true that moderation issues shouldn't result in red tags, generally speaking. I would sooner just put people whose posts I don't want to read on ignore. As a result of this practice, my ignore list is so large it won't open for my profile.

borovichok

hero member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 518

Quote from: digaran on January 09, 2024, 08:06:08 PM

Quote from: borovichok on January 09, 2024, 08:01:24 PM

Quote from: digaran on January 09, 2024, 07:55:54 PM

So Johnny bad boy is now leaving negative trust with no evidence and for moderation related stuff? Meaning he is now taking the matters in his own hands by ignoring moderator's decision and trying to act like one, imposing his made up rule. In other words, JG thinks if a member is not dealt with by mods, he should deal with them and make them leave the forum since he thinks tagging everyone is equal for them to leave.

That scammer is beyond saving now.

Not sure if he has ever changed his feedbacks in the past as I've not been on reputation more often but I hope he does it because it doesn't speak good for both of us. I'm not a trade risk person and I haven't done anything illegal here.

If he tagged anyone for plagiarism, shi*tposting etc, you better to open a thread on meta, since it's directly related to moderation policies.

Theymos can't help anyone, the system is decentralized and if you want to get anything sorted out you have to use the p2p approach on the reputation board. This is exactly what I'm doing.

digaran

copper member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 899

🖤😏

Quote from: borovichok on January 09, 2024, 08:01:24 PM

Quote from: digaran on January 09, 2024, 07:55:54 PM

So Johnny bad boy is now leaving negative trust with no evidence and for moderation related stuff? Meaning he is now taking the matters in his own hands by ignoring moderator's decision and trying to act like one, imposing his made up rule. In other words, JG thinks if a member is not dealt with by mods, he should deal with them and make them leave the forum since he thinks tagging everyone is equal for them to leave.

That scammer is beyond saving now.

Not sure if he has ever changed his feedbacks in the past as I've not been on reputation more often but I hope he does it because it doesn't speak good for both of us. I'm not a trade risk person and I haven't done anything illegal here.

If he tagged anyone for plagiarism, shi*tposting etc, you better to open a thread on meta, since it's directly related to moderation policies.

Topic: Would you tag these users? - page 2. (Read 855 times)