Author

Topic: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation (Read 415 times)

member
Activity: 294
Merit: 10
The same thing happened to me, this user nutildah https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nutildah-317618  
wrongly accused me of something, i confronted him and he continue with the same sociopath pathological behavior towards me, as i was new and did not understand well this trust system i follow his steps and wait for him to support a scam, and when i found out that he was supporting VIVA-e scam i put a negative trust on nutildah profile, because if the rule apply to me because i was apparently supporting the scam exchange tradesatoshi then nutildah deserve the negative review i left on his profile, we are all the same under the forum rules. Misteriusly later the post where he was supporting the scam got deleted, but i was able to archive it with a nice tool i found on google.

So my advice is, wait for that person to support a scam and then flag him as supporter of the scam as i did with the scammer nutildah

I never once said I supported that exchange you fucking retard. Furthermore its already been explained to you multiple times why your supporting post "misteriusly" disappeared.

and i am not denying what i said, is there in the history, any one can see, not like this post from you that mysteriously got removed https://archive.md/C0XaV#selection-2387.0-2439.35

There's no "mystery" behind why it got removed. Suchmoon already explained it to you.

It's you spamming the forum and the trust system with useless garbage. And using threads posted by a known troll as references, so they disappear when the troll gets nuked. Create your own threads and archive them.

The person who wrote the thread you referenced was evading a ban for spamming. They got caught and their posts were deleted. Basically, you were relying on the words of a banned spammer to make your point. Congratulations.

Next time you open a flag, make your own thread instead of relying on that of a ban evading spammer, so that way it won't be removed by mods.

YOU are the Timelord in this situation, fuckbeans.

Edit: Here's an example of what it means to "be a Timelord":

In this ponzi thread (started and being promoted by irfan_pak10) in post 39 irfan_pak10 wants to buy LPCBTC 's account therefore it is possible LPCBTC was sold to irfan_pak10.

You're referencing an account for the Ponzi scheme, not a Bitcointalk account. Do Bitcointalk accounts hold BTC balances?  Roll Eyes

I have This account With $2.52 Balance ( Must deposit To withdrawal )
If you wan I sell $1 Worth bitcoin Wink
Escrow accept

I wanted to buy your account please PM me if you are still selling. I can pay you good amount for this

Of course Ponzi schemes and account sales aren't good, but all this happened 4-5 years ago, so I doubt any tagging will come of it by DT members.

There is no need to call me fucking retard Mr nutildah, i also explained to you that i did not support that tradesatoshi scam exchange and i did not call you a fucking retard, i even ask you to reconsider your negative trust but you are acting with an evil spirit, always insulting me and calling me things like invertebrate.
Why not do peace with me, we can be friends, i am nice person if you get to know me better.
Love!
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
...
So my advice is, wait for that person to support a scam and then flag him as supporter of the scam as i did with the scammer nutildah

I'm sorry to hear that happened.  Yes, from my own experiences with that person I have them on ignore as they tend to high-jack threads with their obsessive startling rants.  As you can see, they hadn't posted in this thread prior to your mention of them, so they are either stalking references to their own name, (if they aren't stalking your posts).

When did your encounter with this person occur?  As you can see from this quote:

Have just recalled that user nutildah offered their own account for sale a while ago as recently as the 23rd of July, 2017. BPIP is inconclusive as the change of password ten times in 77 days didn't occur until 2018.

for a ten month period that account was up for sale by the owner.  Take some advice - just ignore the tossers and don't feed the Trolls.
member
Activity: 294
Merit: 10
The same thing happened to me, this user nutildah https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nutildah-317618  
wrongly accused me of something, i confronted him and he continue with the same sociopath pathological behavior towards me, as i was new and did not understand well this trust system i follow his steps and wait for him to support a scam, and when i found out that he was supporting VIVA-e scam i put a negative trust on nutildah profile, because if the rule apply to me because i was apparently supporting the scam exchange tradesatoshi then nutildah deserve the negative review i left on his profile, we are all the same under the forum rules. Misteriusly later the post where he was supporting the scam got deleted, but i was able to archive it with a nice tool i found on google.

So my advice is, wait for that person to support a scam and then flag him as supporter of the scam as i did with the scammer nutildah
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time, Still he is reluctant to understand the matter.

This is what's known as doubling down...

irfan_pak10 starts a thread Need 0.16 BTC [Archive]

Post #1: 25 October 2014, 03:15:40

Are you tagging account sellers too?

chronicsky was selling accounts here: aNtiClocK was keen to buy...

In this ponzi thread (started and being promoted by irfan_pak10) in post 39 irfan_pak10 wants to buy LPCBTC 's account therefore it is possible LPCBTC was sold to irfan_pak10. aNtiClocK posts in this ponzi thread started by irfan_pak10 saying they have joined.  Notice how aNtiClocK is mentioned *before* posting?

irfan_pak10 also sells accounts in this thread: [Archive]



irfan_pak10 uses the code imranskfuuast ( http://archive.ph/Q2vi3#selection-549.29-549.42 ) in their ponzi thread - coincidentally, there is a user imranskfuuast here on BCT as indicated above.

irfan_pak10 also uses the name imranskfuuast here: [Archive]

irfan_pak10 and aNtiClocK both post in the ponzi thread started by irfan_pak10 - plus they jointly post in #6 numbered archive above for wallet use.

So...

3 Accounts Connected:

imranskfuuast, irfan_pak10, aNtiClocK,
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.
It does not. Theymos is pretty clear about it:
For contractual violations only, a scammer flag can be created. This is the only thing which causes the "Warning: trade with extreme caution" warning to return. It also triggers a banner similar to the newbie-warning banner which is visible to all users. A scammer flag requires 3 more supporting users than opposing users to become active.

~snip~

Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed.
I've opposed the Flag because I think it's Flag abuse. Just yesterday, you were on DT2, but you're not anymore, which means you've been excluded by at least 2 DT1 users (suchmoon and DarkStar_).

You left feedback for retaliatory purposes, which I think is wrong in the first place.
Agreed. I've explained my position on this in LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.



My advice: withdraw this Flag, Oppose it, and make your arguments against the accusation without the drama.
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

Many have tried to damage reputations of others around here, and many have failed.  Timelord2067's review is not trusted, so it really doesn't mean much.  It would be pretty hard to justify the claim that it cost you potential income, and impossible to prove that any agreement was implied.  That's not proper justification for a flag, and if you create a flag under that premise then you are abusing the system.

I've read your justification for using that address, and I believe you.  The best thing to do at this point is for both you and Timelord2067 to remove your feedback.  You left feedback for retaliatory purposes, which I think is wrong in the first place.  Perhaps by rationally discussing the situation with Timelord2067 in PM you can convince him to remove his feedback.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

Please post the casual/implied agreement made between you and Timelord2067.

It's an implied agreement, as there is no such written agreement between us.

Post the written aspect that implies an agreement of some sort. When did he state that he would exempt you from any "investigation"? Or when did he state that he would remove his negative trust? I'm not seeing any form of agreement, implied or not.

What exactly was this implied agreement about?
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1654
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

Please post the casual/implied agreement made between you and Timelord2067.

It's an implied agreement, as there is no such written agreement between us.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

It doesn't. At best it's a flag for trolling, which I must oppose. You already posted a borderline-retaliatory neg-trust rating and you should leave it at that.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

Please post the casual/implied agreement made between you and Timelord2067.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1654
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time
That is not the right reason to create a flag against someone. I mean if you check the type of supported flags,

Quote
   Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.)
   This user violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages.
   This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages.
your case doesn't fit any of the above-mentioned reasons.

He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1317
Get your game girl
I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time
That is not the right reason to create a flag against someone. I mean if you check the type of supported flags,

Quote
   Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.)
   This user violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages.
   This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages.
your case doesn't fit any of the above-mentioned reasons.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1654
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
Jump to: