Pages:
Author

Topic: Wrong negative trust from lauda - page 2. (Read 996 times)

copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
September 02, 2017, 10:34:56 AM
#7
Account trading is untrustworthy. Due to this, Lauda is absolutely within their rights to give you a negative trust for it.
As the account isn't sold to me, so I believe I don't deserve this negative.
I had the intention of committing murder. I told people that specifically on this day and with this tool I would murder this individual. I conspired to commit murder. Now, do you think that people are going to wait until after the murder to stop you?
It's not the act, it's the intention. And you were a participant in an account trade. It just didn't go through... from what you're saying.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1268
In Memory of Zepher
September 02, 2017, 10:34:24 AM
#6
As the account isn't sold to me, so I believe I don't deserve this negative.
If I try to steal from someone, but don't actually do it, do I not deserve a negative?

You wanted to partake in account trading, which is untrustworthy. Therefore, you are untrustworthy.
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
PUGG.io
September 02, 2017, 10:30:57 AM
#5
Account trading is untrustworthy. Due to this, Lauda is absolutely within their rights to give you a negative trust for it.
As the account isn't sold to me, so I believe I don't deserve this negative.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
September 02, 2017, 10:21:34 AM
#4
"I was not buying the account to scam anyone it's just that my account is having enough activity to become a legendary member but it haven't yet become one.... So it is very frustrating for me. "

You ever see the Hero Members at 1k+ activity like deisik that were waiting to become Legendary? If you've been patient enough to post for 2 years then what's a couple more months? [on average]
You wanted to get a Legendary account for the signature, right? Yeah... managing more than one account in signature campaigns usually declines the post quality exponentially. If it's likely that you'd spam/scam then why condone it?
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1268
In Memory of Zepher
September 02, 2017, 10:20:06 AM
#3
Account trading is untrustworthy. Due to this, Lauda is absolutely within their rights to give you a negative trust for it.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1451
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 02, 2017, 10:14:59 AM
#2
First things first, I think that its your fault for using a high ranked account on an auction bidding for bitcoin accounts. This gives away your identity either way. Also, trust ratings are subjective and not moderated so there's not much anyone else can do. On a personal level, you could remove Lauda from your trust list and/or encourage others to do so.
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
PUGG.io
September 02, 2017, 10:10:59 AM
#1
Recently in an auction of a legendary account I placed bid and won the auction and also won a negative from lauda.

So I sent a pm to her stating
Quote
I was not buying the account to scam anyone it's just that my account is having enough activity to become a legendary member but it haven't yet become one.... So it is very frustrating for me.

And about the trust of that account, it's just I don't care about it. I was asking about the trust because many a times people try to sell negative trust accounts which are not worthy of anything.

I will cancel the deal if my account gets a negative trust for it. And BTW the owner haven't responded to any of my pm.

Please remove the negative trust from my account
And her reply was simple

Quote
No




So I just want to say that the account wasn't sold as the user selling the account haven't responded to several pm which I sent to him.
Secondly I haven't scammed someone so negative isn't necessary for my action.
Pages:
Jump to: