Topic: Wrongful accusation by Timelord. Did Yahoo put him in DT? (Read 1500 times)

Case #1 (of this post)

2 Accounts Connected:

w40ut (loan default), iTeachYouLearn (Scammer and "thief") via Wallet [064feb3f91]

Proof:

Wallet [064feb3f91] contains the following wallet addresses:

• w40ut uses the following wallet addresses:
  
  
  • 1KDcJ27dTDhXpb52tWS4Y4dFmaceswVc2N here: [1], [2],
  • 1DxYfQZPxPVTX1xbBzoifqnBFcxUEEPE7J here: [1],
  • 1F3GdEXMXgW1pxEY6cgj7ZNTqJeENrt8zm here: [1],
  • http://archive.ph/K2cQj#selection-6067.0-6067.34
• iTeachYouLearn uses the following wallet addresses:
  
  
  • 16e5g5jvm4R1B61YWmTxFmz2Jt3jbFJQnP here: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6],
  • 19Kupgx9fAb6nmnXAQqEJ92CLzqHsk81H1 here: [1], [2 (Heutenamos also posts but does not take out a loan)], [3], [4], [5], [6],

None of the other wallet addresses have been used on BCT from what I can tell.

---

Case #2 (of this post)

3 Accounts Connected:

minime0105 (captcha workers), gargaho01, ATeam,

Proof:

All three users use the user name

• gargaho01 uses the name here: [1], [2],
• minime0105 uses the name here: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
• ATeam uses the name here: [1], [2], [3]

---

Case #3

w40ut (loan defaulter), - SpaceMan, - SpaceMan2,

- SpaceMan has two unresolved scam accusations against them [1], [2],

Related Addresses:

w40ut uses the Skype address tiagoleal99 while


uses tiagoleal99  in their email address.

- SpaceMan (including the preceding dash) like minime0105 starts a captcha workers thread then somehow scams a participant for a loan which they never pay back.

28 March 2016, 21:11:01 Date Registered:    - SpaceMan   142
30 March 2016, 00:50:02 Date Registered:    - SpaceMan2
30 March 2016, 02:24:16 Last Active:       - SpaceMan2
31 March 2016, 03:48:37 Date Registered:    x2Bitcoin
31 March 2016, 22:18:01 Last Active:       x2Bitcoin

28 April 2016, 17:21:29 Date Registered:    ATeam   25
May 01, 2016, 01:26:57 PM Last actual post:   - SpaceMan
02 May 2016, 08:14:55 Last Active:       iTeachYouLearn
08 May 2016, 22:03:01 Last Active:       - SpaceMan

I'm throwing in - SpaceMan2 (activity zero) simply because of their close registration time to - SpaceMan

---

w40ut uses the email


here: [Archive]

iTeachYouLearn sold a steam account for $3 then took it back here: [Archive]

The account name was

---

So far we have the following:

19 June 2015, 22:24:08 Date Registered:    w40ut

28 October 2015, 11:58:32   w40ut defaults on a loan
29 October 2015, 08:52:32 Date Registered:    iTeachYouLearn   230

07 December 2015, 02:20:28 Date Registered:    gargaho01   13

28 April 2016, 17:21:29 Date Registered:    ATeam   25

09 February 2016, 17:28:18 Last Active:    gargaho01
21 February 2016, 22:32:05 Date Registered:    minime0105

28 March 2016, 21:11:01 Date Registered:    - SpaceMan   142
30 March 2016, 00:50:02 Date Registered:    - SpaceMan2
30 March 2016, 02:24:16 Last Active:       - SpaceMan2
31 March 2016, 03:48:37 Date Registered:    x2Bitcoin
31 March 2016, 22:18:01 Last Active:       x2Bitcoin

28 April 2016, 17:21:29 Date Registered:    ATeam   25
May 01, 2016, 01:26:57 PM Last actual post:   - SpaceMan
02 May 2016, 08:14:55 Last Active:       iTeachYouLearn
08 May 2016, 22:03:01 Last Active:       - SpaceMan

18 September 2016, 02:28:37 Date Registered:    GoodMorningVietnam
29 September 2016, 09:01:50 Last Active:    w40ut

24 November 2016, 13:26:08 Last Active:    ATeam

12 October 2017, 12:58:23 Last Active:       GoodMorningVietnam

Miscellaneous:

iTeachYouLearn account was "stolen" from @yahoo62278 in 2016 after the account was put up as collateral - however connections occurr *prior* to that date, so iTeachYouLearn is connected to the OP minime0105 via w40ut

Now that irfan pak has demonstrated, perhaps for the 20th time in the last couple of months alone, what an incredibly lame and chronically false job TimeSink is doing with his pseudo detective "work",

it would be the ethical thing to do for anyone who wrote laudatory feedback to TimeSink under the guise of "countering" irfan pak's provably correct assessment of him to now remove those fake positive ratings.

Here is my proof: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53022550

Perhaps you might like to use your DT1 powers to start tagging all of these alts of minime0105?

---

---

Should I start with DankCoins or BTCBLOGGER? "b234FEzz" anyone?

---

Your wish is my command!

if you can only see "removed from campaign by moderator" at https://yobit.net/en/signature/ then you have to check this off and forget about it.
as you can see here i had the same problem... or i still have it. yahoo can't help that either. the people in charge of the campaign have no interest in the individual fate. it's best to look for alternatives and don't worry too much about it (even if it's not always that easy)
the other points have already been discussed in detail. just wanted to say a few words about the CT campaign.

Perhaps not, but as the OP him/herself showed in the PM's they posted without permission, I am working (and believe me, it's been slow work) to gather all the evidence I never put together in 2016. 


Thank you for your support - I'll be sure to keep that in mind from now on.

---

Had I completed my earlier investigation and placed a negative for this back in 2016


we wouldn't be having this conversation now.

@Timelord, I value some of your findings and respect your years of work on alts. But as per your explanation here about the connection OP should be labeled as an scammer or alt ( as per your feedback ) because he has used the word SCAMMER with same spelling like other users registered at around same time. This really doesn't look logical does it ?

Rather, I would like to help you getting this out.

minime0105 is not to be trusted person if you see in his history on the forum.

He created a thread here to pay for captcha work to the users who will do this for him.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-1450199

But he still never paid them or answered there.

This surely looks like a breach of contract and some of the victim in that thread could start a type 3 flag for violation of a contract. A type 1 flag still suits here if I am not wrong.

Just want to say that the connections you are applying are pretty much weak here to be taken into consideration.

You used the same btc addy to receive payment as one of connected accounts. Looks like solid connection unless you have something to add here and as you are on dt I am going to counter your negative for now.

@timelord someone posting the same words is usually not good connection 

Thank you for your support TECSHARE - as I've been trying to explain I am rebuilding my work on these users - one of the things I never did at the time was archive my work, so I am having to go through dozens of posts and archive everything which is slow going.

Given some people in this thread seem to still have lingering doubts, this is just one example of connections to other scam accounts:

4 Accounts Connected:

w40ut (loan default), minime0105 (the OP of this thread), x2Bitcoin (Ponzi), GoodMorningVietnam (coding scam), 

Proof:


is the username these UID's use to claim from various campaigns.

• w40ut uses the username w40ut here: [1],
• minime0105 uses the username w40ut here: [1], [2], [3]
• GoodMorningVietnam uses the username w40ut here: [1] (their Skype/Facebook profile)

Miscellaneous:

w40ut defaulted on a loan: http://archive.ph/v1vhI#selection-4799.0-4799.29

---

Lutpin identifies x2Bitcoin as being an alt of w40ut through a Ponzi website.

---

GoodMorningVietnam receives six negative feedback/trust wall posts over a two month period for a coding scam.



(all of this pre-dates my Red Paint ^TM on minime0105's trust/feedback wall...)

 

Seems like they said "SCAMMMERRR!!", and woke up within 24 hours of each other, clearly case closed.

Nice to know some people value my work. 


Interesting.

Who the f* is this guy. He connected me with 20 other people whom I never made a contact ever except for superstar which is in 2015

Although this is indeed meaningless to DefaultTrust, it's not meaningless to (some) users with a custom Trust list. Due to it's large recursive implications, several people including yahoo62278 had you on their Depth 1 (or Depth 2). If they don't want that, excluding you isn't meaningless to them.
As of last Saturday, yahoo62278 didn't exclude Timelord2067 yet. I can't tell if that changed more recently.

What is connection between OP and other accounts?

Thread (such as it is) Archived for future reference.

---

Timing is everything.

I posted on the 30 October 2019, 11:54:44 (GMT +10) that I would be away until Monday the 4th of November 2019.


Some sixteen hours later at 31 October 2019, 04:32:22 (GMT +10) the OP minime0105 started this thread.  Four DT1's (not including @Vod removing his trust of me) have added their names to the distrust list that @LoyceV started.

Good for you.  Nine or thirteen DT's distrusting someone becomes meaningless numbers on a page.

---

Without permission the OP has posted portions of my correspondence including that I am re-investigating the Red Paint ^TM I put on their Trust wall/feedback.




It's by no means complete - I wouldn't ordinarily divulge this information this early until I have gathered/recompiled much more evidence, however this thread needs to be slapped down now and the DT's called out for being gullible to the wailing's of a prolific scammer.

---

For the moment I'm not going to reveal too much more, but I'll ask the wowsers on DT a couple of questions:

Why did none of you perform a litmus test [1], [2] on my trust wall/feedback post?

In 30 seconds you would have seen this:

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=minime0105      2019-09-28 8:34:03 PM    woke up         minime0105
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=superSTAR777   2019-09-30 8:01:51 PM    woke up         superSTAR777

What would the odds of two of the three scammer's alts waking up within 48 hours of each-other out of the more than 2.6 million other BCT UID accounts?

---

In my notes it looks as though nearly all UID's that contain the term


in their profile name are quite likely alts.

---

A year ago, (BPIP again) this happened:

02 May 2018, 00:30:52 Date Registered:       Minime1985
2018-05-03 6:04:56 PM    woke up         superSTAR777
2018-05-04 7:33:44 AM    password changed   BTCreward
2018-05-08 6:15:15 AM    password changed   VPScreator
2018-05-12 8:16:13 AM    password changed   minime0105
2018-05-12 8:20:21 AM    password changed   minime0105
14 May 2018, 15:24:41 Date Registered:       minimeee
28 May 2018, 05:43:23 Last Active:        raderhamart

How coincidental is it that again two of the three scammer alts (plus other alts) are active in such a short period of time either waking up, or, changing their passwords?

---

Or, what about:

September 29, 2018, 09:41:11 PM Last actual active: minime0105
2018-09-30 9:29:30 PM    woke up         MargonCreatives
01 October 2018, 08:00:00 Last Active:       MargonCreatives

---

Is that just not coincidental enough for you good people on DT?  Naturally, had I been alllowed to complete my re-investigation I would be able to divulge further information.  But now you'll have to wait; threatening me as legendster has done isn't going to incentivise me to get the job done any quicker.

@legendster - We have a name for people like you here in Australia: Gunna!

legendster says he's Gunna! add me to his list. legendster says he's Gunna! do this, he's Gunna! do that he's Gunna!Gunna!Gunna! do things.

Go right ahead.

Your three options are

• legendster can create a scam accusation - he says he's Gunna! target "only for them to screw with someone for a big amount"
  
  Those people are called scammers.  You can post a scam accusation against me in the so named thread.
  
  Here is the correct form you'll need to use:
  
  

(good luck with that by the way)

[/li]

• You can ramp it up and create a flag against me by clicking here.
• OR, if you are brave enough, you can join Cryptorianx in supporting this Flag already started against me...

Wot ya Gunna! do - legendster?

---

@suchmoon @hilariousandco @hilariousetc @TECSHARE @minifrij @xtraelv @Stack23 @The-One-Above-All @The Pharmacist @hacker1001101001 - any questions?

Yes, you value his efforts personally and for profit. Of course it costs you nothing if he is wrong. That is an externalized cost that is paid in the form of driving away good users, which as a result ironically ends up with more people buying accounts. Think of it like a criminal robbing a gas station. If the penalty is the same for being armed or not being armed, most criminals would choose to go further and be armed anyway knowing the penalty is equally as high either way. The same logic is true with excessive and arbitrary trust ratings and flags. People get wrapped up in relatively minor things and are more willing to just burn what they have and or go for the bigger con since they all all treated the same anyway. Basically the cons are Joker and the BitCops are Batman. They are literally creating more Jokers. Jokers will always be there but this system of frivolous shotgun ratings is literally incentivizing it.

Again, a non-intentioned con man user will usually do one of two things if they are falsely accused. They will either say fuck this place and rob whatever they can, or say fuck this place and never come back. Unfortunately the real cons are back again in seconds on a new bought account. The trust system should not be used like a sledge hammer, it should be treated like a ballpene hammer pinning down a con with a bunch of tack nails. This gives legitimate users breathing room, and will not give any realistic advantages to cons that they couldn't easily bypass. At absolute best you are burning accounts, creating value for them by reducing supply, and again incentivizing people to buy accounts and thus for others to sell them. Its like the war on drugs. Eventually the enforcement action literally becomes the mechanism by which illicit drugs have value, because the value is determined by risk, and risk is directly correlated with levels of enforcement. In short this methodology is the BitCop's, cutting the community's nose off to spite its face.

Wrong.  I value his efforts, not his findings.  Words matter, you understand them, stop pretending you don't.

Actually I originally quoted the whole thing. The other half is not exactly exonerating you anyway. You clarify his findings are not always accurate, but you value them for selfish reasons anyway. I am not selectively focusing on anything.

This is part of the problem with this default trust nepotism protection racket. People get all hyper focused on what serves them personally and unless people are helping them everyone else can go fuck themselves, they are on their own. Knowing this attitude is prevalent others take advantage of it and pressure compliance with a core group of users pushing out anyone with a dissenting opinion, and devaluing anyone who doesn't belong to the special boys club. You said it. You also claimed that because this user returned to earn via a signature ad he is not a contributing member from your lofty special boy perch. Again, this is exactly what I meant by you abandoning your principals. It is no longer about what is fair, right, or best for the community, it is now about what serves you and protects your position. Maybe you can make some more accusations about me being desperate to be on the default trust as I continually call out those most able to place me there. Maybe no one will notice your desperation to stay on it at all costs if you project hard enough.

Here are my words, unedited, and not retracted:


It's only one sentence, but you selectively choose to focus on half of it.



Genuine lolz, that was funny.  But I have a feeling Nutildah is still having too much fun with Cryptohunter's goat.

That is the cowards way. Stop advocating cowardly behaviors. Man up and make a stand. If something is not fair don't run away and pretend you are the bigger man for doing so. This does not just stop with yobit it goes for ANY CAMPAIGN these weasel corrupt campaign managers can be ruined at any moment and so can any project that uses them.

If I were to spot a new and interesting project that I wanted to put in my sig and yahoo turned me down and could not provide an explanation that stood up to scrutiny I would dedicate my time and bring on more friends to ensure that as many people as possible understood both him and the project that advocates his behavior are employing corrupt and unfair practices...... staying within the rules and on topic. You can be sure of that. Weeks, months or years of compounded pressure with nothing to lose against those that wish to remain squeaky clean is a very strong position to be in.

Saying that you will highlight and stand up to corruption is saying you will protect the entire board of both would be advertisers and investors. There is no other way to see it once you understand the damage that allowing gaming and corruption of the initial distribution of tokens can bring.

Start manning up , read my guild how to induce FAIR TRANSPARENT RULES SO THAT EVERY MEMBER IS TREATED EQUALLY.

If you find you are getting kicked from a project on PROVABLY unfair bias like yahoo has done here then we will assist and advice on how you can certainly make sure that this does not keep happening with other members.

Satoshi would welcome such action.

The weak and pathetic are just as guilty as the corrupt and greedy, both of whom are permitting others to suffer injustice.

Cowards run away... look at yahoo??? where is that scumbag now that we threw down a post he has no answer to?  half the people he regularly employs on his campaigns are here in the dirty turds thread UNDENIABLY guilty of being financially high risk or even outright scammers. Take a read.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/poll-the-official-dirty-turds-poll-which-dt-needs-flushing-first-5170789

see if any of those are, or were on yahoo's campaigns and then investigate their prior undeniable wrong doings and then see if they are worse that the " possible" wrong doings others he rejects from his campaigns.

This is the challenge we offer YAHOO but the weasel will not rise to the challenge will he???  he runs away.

Still though people are worried about the incorrectness of timelords feeback ( who is not even on dt now) when the action taken here that upset the individual was yahoo's.

Feedback means NOTHING if not enforced by the campaign managers to 99% of members here.