Bottom line is Bitcoin was worth below cents at a time. Most people tend to forget what value is attributed to and here's the number thing. Mass adoption and intrinsic value. Anon coins are not what people care about. If you asked anybody on the street and if they wanted their accounts to be completely anonymous they really wouldn't care. One because they're not doing any illegal transactions and two.....why? Think about it. Bitcoinplus is not anon. So what. Bitcoinplus has got the name, the advertisement And I'll keep bombing everywhere with adverts as much as I can. The wallet works just as good as btc and That's fine for now. The rest of the crew that's sticking around are thinking and devising great ideas and trust us. It is pretty revolutionary so hold on. XBC FOR LIFE.
Regarding your main point."If you asked anybody on the street?"(At the moment we are catering for trolls/traders and cryptosimpz so hardly your average Joe/Jane on the street now is it?)The anon feature is not the issue here besides there is a major difference between anonymous and unaccountable versus privacy and the majority of bank customers in "the real world" value their privacy whether you agree or not and privacy not only to protect the clients dignity but also to protect against fraud and illegal snooping.Only someone who has never worked in finance or is speaking through a lack of experience would disagree however it is agreed that good standing of the network is maintained also through responsible use by both the customer and merchant where the type of merchants approved to accept XBC are legally compliant and anyone misusing the network has their wallet revoked or some other form of sanction applied.(This is just a simple example).
You refer to instrinsic value however extrinsic value mentioned above contributes to instrinsic value and looking at the instrinsic principal value so far we have basically a coin with a plus sign added to an original coins name where certain individuals walked with the capital raised.Who is to say that the person "XBCplus" was not simply a fiction in order to create a strawman charade?Who is not to say that he was simply a character initially presented in order to extract the IPO funds while the actual string pullers remained in the game with large positions enabling a secondary pillage and hence current price and suckers left holding the bag?Deception has been used and is currently being used on other coin communities by some of the very same individuals).A second takeover that has failed and price tanking without any development brought to fruition and now a community member presenting a third option while the price stagnates lower than previous negative values and taking holders into further negative equity.
You talk about "mass adoption".Can you give us a breakdown of the types of media outlet you are presenting your advertisements on.Are they mainstream outlets that the "masses" on the street view in the normal course of the day?
If you wish to be "transparent" then disclose your plans here so investors can ascess them.
I do have great respect for your efforts and enthusiasm however.