Topic: [XCT] C-Bit - Elegantly Solving Bitcoin's Blocksize Problem [SHA256][POW] - page 32. (Read 66819 times)

You don't like the way I write ?

I like what I'm seeing here. DanOnTheHill has valid points but, if dev is going to stay anon that is ok too.  Only thing that is weird to me so far is Martens formatting of posts.  Could you not make the pages longer m8? 

If linkedin and other searches are correct, he's got the creds.

Be nice.

ok so in due diligence did you go get background checks done on the cable guy before you let him hook up your cable
and did you ask the names and information of all of the employees of your bank before opening your account and at or durin each visit... i think not, so fuck off with that bullshit due diligence excuse for your personal attempt at stalkerlike behavior

Some, yes. All, no.  This dev has already been forthcoming with own his name and made various claims about the people involved and the financing of this project.  Google search turned up blank for the 21 names that were published on the website, hence seeking further validation. 

gotcha.. so you know all the peoples full names and linkedin accounts that created every coin you get involved in?

It's called due diligence. 

seriously this fuckin guy sounds like a stalker lol

dude. why dont you just give up on this and GTFO already.
look at your posts here, you are just a troll, doing nothing but trying to dig up info on those involved with c-bit
now GTFO and be a troll somewhere else

How about yourself? You appear to be using your real name. Do you have Linkedin?

*********
Yes to code
*********

Also, I need to clarify my last statement above a little.

Any Developers interested in helping C-bit are more
than welcome to help. The more brains we have, the
better. Just PM me with a return e-mail address and
I'll have the head developer contact you. We are not
trying to hide. Come join us with your talents.

The point I was trying to make was that we will not
be publicly broadcasting our developers names or
their forum names or any other details. They will
remain anonymous and in the background forever.
They will not be appearing at conventions or roundtables.
Based upon the rabid Bitcoin trollers out there, our
developers do not need their websites, forum pages,
nor their careers turned upside down by the crazies
out there; or shunned because of their participation
in what might be considered a "taboo" project by some.
They just want to help an interesting project and be left
alone.

In addition, even within the C-bit development group,
you can be anonymous. It's the work you do that is
important, not who you are. When you PM, just be sure
to start with either an anonymous name or your real
identity, you choose.

If you, as a Developer, want fame and recognition,
outside the immediate C-bit group, then C-bit is not
for you.

Our Developers like the feeling that they can sit right
next to Gavin Anderson in his office and listen to him
rant about C-bit; then know that Gavin has no idea that
at night they're working on C-bit.

William Martens
Founder C-bit

The people on the website were coders who contributed code to C-Bit and working in the Bitcoin space?

Very simple.

Based upon reactions from Bitcoin
trollers, and our developers relations
within the Bitcoin community, they will
remain Ghosts. Judge C-bit upon the
source code, what we add to the coin,
our development as a coin, and our
actions; not on any personalities. This
is about the coin, and it will never be
about us.

If you must tie C-bit to personalities,
then this is not the coin for you.

After next week, the Bitcoin trollers, who
hate competition, will explode on this
board in an attempt to destroy C-bit.

Get ready, it's coming.


William Martens
Founder C-bit

For the moment there is only pools,one exchange and the interest of the community in this coin.
Why don't we let C-bit staff do their work and release what they promised instead of taking debates here.It's a cryptocurrency,if someone doubt or afraid of it,he can sell his coins at a profitable price and move on,those who trust,can hold their coins or speculate and accumulate.
If this C-bit will fail,we can only blame ourselves.cryptoworld is full of coins and everyone can choose the coin that fit his perspectives and his intellectual or financial level.
At least all these dev's are contributing to the growth of the crypto technology in many ways;So let's let them do their work and watch the progress

Sorry for my bad English  

I asked earlier twice about the contributors to this coin development, but my question was avoided.  Since then the names of the contributors have been removed from the website. Why?

sir, your remarks are irrelevant. Martens is doing his part as founder of this coin whilst all you're doing is trying to incite attention towards yourself by attempting to instigate things. perhaps you should take this elsewhere

You already said that you did not develop website or the coin.

Ok then. I give him the benefit of the doubt.

but I am out and good luck to all.

Obviously you've never developed a coin.

I can tell that just by your comments.

I suggest you go out a build a clone of
Bitcoin ( it's so easy ), then develop all
the wallets. Remember to actually clone
Bitcoin 0.12.0 and change the basic parameters.
Then develop the website and all the connections
it needs, then the network and the pools worldwide.
Spend all the time it requires. When you've done
that, and added up all the time and the costs;
then, you can come back to us, be on a
professional par with us; and, then the you
can share with our team your valued opinion.

William Martens
Founder C-bit

you do realize there are over 300 bitcoin developers right? i mean, i'm a developer, and i'm interested. i think there's room for a coin like this. just look how many coins are built from old versions of bitcoin/ppc that are complete shit. this one is built from .12, which is the newest release.